Home About us Contact | |||
Near Point (near + point)
Selected AbstractsInfluence of target type and RAF rule on the measurement of near point of convergenceOPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 1 2007Paul M. Adler Abstract Purpose:, This study was designed to investigate if the use of different target types or the RAF rule affected the measurement of near point of convergence (NPC). Methods:, The subjects comprised three groups: (1) 20 children aged 6,9 years (2) 17 children aged 11,13 years (3) 14 adults aged 20,30 years. Five targets were used to measure the NPC: (1) pencil tip, (2) fingertip, (3) penlight, (4) N5 letter and (5) vertical line target on the RAF rule. Results:, There was no significant difference in NPC measurements between the pencil tip, fingertip and N5 target in free space. The penlight resulted in significantly more remote NPC break and recovery points compared with the fingertip and pencil tip (p < 0.05). The RAF rule influences the NPC obtained (p < 0.001). The greatest difference in NPC measurements was observed when comparing the RAF line target and the finger in free space; the former resulted in NPC values of 1.9 times (95% CI 1.6,2.2 times) as much as those obtained with the finger. Conclusions:, Use of the penlight and RAF rule resulted in a more distant NPC break point compared with other targets. The effect of the RAF rule was more apparent for more receded NPC points. [source] Efficacy of treatment for convergence insufficiency using vision therapyOPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, Issue 6 2002Paul Adler Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if vision therapy (VT), as practised within the constraints of UK optometric practice, employing graded routine eye exercises, is as an effective method for treatment of convergence insufficiency (CI) as previously published data suggest. The study also evaluates the associated symptoms before and after therapy. Methods: As many optometrists diagnose CI solely on the basis of near point of convergence (NPC) and treat only when symptoms are present (Letourneau et al., 1979; Rouse et al., 1997), in this study CI was defined as NPC of 10 cm or greater (either with or without the presence of asthenopic symptoms for near work) accompanied by exophoria greater at near than at distance. The effect of treatment by optometric vision therapy (OVT) on the NPC and number of symptoms was investigated for 92 patients by retrospectively reviewing the clinical records. Success was defined as the restoration of NPC to normal values and significant reduction in the presenting symptoms. Results: The effect of treatment on the NPC was shown to be highly significant (t = 14.61, p < 0.001). Although treatment times were slightly longer, the success rates were higher than reported by other authors. Post-treatment values for NPC were: <10 cm (98.9%), <8.5 cm (95.7%) and <6.5 cm (80.4%). Longer treatment times were noted for patients who complained that the text appeared to move (,2, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Vision therapy is an effective method for treatment of CI. [source] Comparing methods of determining addition in presbyopesCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, Issue 3 2008Beatriz Antona BSc Background:, The use of plus lenses to compensate for the reduction in the range of accommodation associated with presbyopia, brings the near point of accommodation to a comfortable distance for near visual tasks. Our aim was to compare the tentative near addition determined using the most common procedures with the final addition prescribed in presbyopic patients. Methods:, Sixty-nine healthy subjects with a mean age of 51.0 years (range 40 to 60 years) were studied. Tentative near additions were determined using seven different techniques: dynamic retinoscopy, amplitude of accommodation (AA), age-expected addition, binocular fused cross-cylinder with and without myopisation, near duochrome, and balance of negative and positive relative accommodation. The power of the addition was then refined to arrive at the final addition. Results:, The mean tentative near additions were higher than the final addition for every procedure except for the fused cross-cylinder without initial myopisation and age-expected addition methods. These biases were small in clinical terms (less than 0.25 D) with the exception of the AA procedure (0.34 D). The intervals between the 95% limits of agreement differed substantially and were always higher than ±0.50 D. Conclusions:, All the techniques used displayed similar behaviour and provided a tentative addition close to the final addition. Due to the wide agreement intervals observed, the likelihood of error is high and supports the idea that any tentative addition has to be adjusted according to the particular needs of each patient. Among the methods examined here, we would recommend the age-expected procedure, as this technique produced results that correlated best with the final addition. [source] |