			Home About us Contact

Naloxone Treatment (naloxone + treatment)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Protective effects of naloxone in two-hit seizure model

EPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2010
Lu Yang
Summary Purpose:, Early life status epilepticus (SE) could enhance the vulnerability of the immature brain to a second SE in adulthood (two-hit seizure model). Naloxone has been proved to possess inflammation inhibitory effects in nervous system. This study was designed to evaluate the dose-dependent protective effects of naloxone in kainic acid (KA),induced two-hit seizure model. Methods:, After KA-induced SE at postnatal day 15 (P15), Sprague-Dawley rats were infused with either saline or different doses (1.92, 3.84, 5.76, and 7.68 mg/kg) of naloxone continuously for 12 h. De novo synthesis of cytokines (interleukin-1, [IL-1,], S100B) was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 12 h after P15 SE. Glial activation states were analyzed by western blotting of glial markers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B, Iba1) both at 12 h after P15 SE and at P45. After a second SE at P45, cognitive deteriorations were evaluated by Morris water tests and neuron injuries were evaluated by TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays. Results:, Naloxone reduced IL-1, synthesis and microglial activation most potently at a dose of 3.84 mg/kg. Attenuation of S100B synthesis and astrocyte activation were achieved most dramatically by naloxone at a dose of 5.76 mg/kg, which is equal to the most powerful dose in ameliorating cognitive injuries and neuron apoptosis after second SE. Conclusions:, Naloxone treatment immediately after early life SE could dose-dependently reduce cytokine production, glial activation, and further lower the vulnerability of immature brains to a second hit in adulthood. [source]

Cost-effectiveness of extended buprenorphine,naloxone treatment for opioid-dependent youth: data from a randomized trial

ADDICTION, Issue 9 2010
Daniel Polsky
ABSTRACT Aims The objective is to estimate cost, net social cost and cost-effectiveness in a clinical trial of extended buprenorphine,naloxone (BUP) treatment versus brief detoxification treatment in opioid-dependent youth. Design Economic evaluation of a clinical trial conducted at six community out-patient treatment programs from July 2003 to December 2006, who were randomized to 12 weeks of BUP or a 14-day taper (DETOX). BUP patients were prescribed up to 24 mg per day for 9 weeks and then tapered to zero at the end of week 12. DETOX patients were prescribed up to 14 mg per day and then tapered to zero on day 14. All were offered twice-weekly drug counseling. Participants 152 patients aged 15,21 years. Measurements Data were collected prospectively during the 12-week treatment and at follow-up interviews at months 6, 9 and 12. Findings The 12-week out-patient study treatment cost was $1514 (P < 0.001) higher for BUP relative to DETOX. One-year total direct medical cost was only $83 higher for BUP (P = 0.97). The cost-effectiveness ratio of BUP relative to DETOX was $1376 in terms of 1-year direct medical cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $25 049 in terms of out-patient treatment program cost per QALY. The acceptability curve suggests that the cost-effectiveness ratio of BUP relative to DETOX has an 86% chance of being accepted as cost-effective for a threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusions Extended BUP treatment relative to brief detoxification is cost effective in the US health-care system for the outpatient treatment of opioid-dependent youth. [source]

Randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose

ADDICTION, Issue 12 2009
Debra Kerr
ABSTRACT Aims Traditionally, the opiate antagonist naloxone has been administered parenterally; however, intranasal (i.n.) administration has the potential to reduce the risk of needlestick injury. This is important when working with populations known to have a high prevalence of blood-borne viruses. Preliminary research suggests that i.n. administration might be effective, but suboptimal naloxone solutions were used. This study compared the effectiveness of concentrated (2 mg/ml) i.n. naloxone to intramuscular (i.m.) naloxone for suspected opiate overdose. Methods This randomized controlled trial included patients treated for suspected opiate overdose in the pre-hospital setting. Patients received 2 mg of either i.n. or i.m. naloxone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who responded within 10 minutes of naloxone treatment. Secondary outcomes included time to adequate response and requirement for supplementary naloxone. Data were analysed using multivariate statistical techniques. Results A total of 172 patients were enrolled into the study. Median age was 29 years and 74% were male. Rates of response within 10 minutes were similar: i.n. naloxone (60/83, 72.3%) compared with i.m. naloxone (69/89, 77.5%) [difference: ,5.2%, 95% confidence interval (CI) ,18.2 to 7.7]. No difference was observed in mean response time (i.n.: 8.0, i.m.: 7.9 minutes; difference 0.1, 95% CI ,1.3 to 1.5). Supplementary naloxone was administered to fewer patients who received i.m. naloxone (i.n.: 18.1%; i.m.: 4.5%) (difference: 13.6%, 95% CI 4.2,22.9). Conclusions Concentrated intranasal naloxone reversed heroin overdose successfully in 82% of patients. Time to adequate response was the same for both routes, suggesting that the i.n. route of administration is of similar effectiveness to the i.m. route as a first-line treatment for heroin overdose. [source]

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalographic changes in a newborn induced by overdose of morphine and corrected with naloxone

ACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 1 2008
HJ Niemarkt
The amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) is a useful tool to assess brain function after perinatal asphyxia in term infants. We report a full-term newborn with moderate perinatal asphyxia, who accidentally received an overdose of morphine (5000 ,g/kg). The overdose of morphine resulted in a clear and immediate change of aEEG background activity from a continuous (C) to discontinuous (DC) background pattern. After administration of naloxone, the background activity restored immediately to continuous background pattern. The aEEG was used to monitor the stepwise reduction in continuous naloxone infusion. Conclusion: An overdose of morphine leads to clear and immediate changes in aEEG which restore after naloxone treatment. The aEEG can be used to monitor naloxone infusion. [source]