Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Multiple Taxa (multiple + taxa)
Selected AbstractsSurrogacy and persistence in reserve selection: landscape prioritization for multiple taxa in BritainJOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Aldina M. A. Franco Summary 1A principal goal of protected-area networks is to maintain viable populations of as many species as possible, particularly those that are vulnerable to environmental change outside reserves. Ideally, one wants to be able to protect all biodiversity when selecting priority areas for conservation. 2Using the area-prioritization algorithm ZONATION, we identified the locations where UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) species of mammals, birds, herptiles, butterflies and plants occur in concentrated populations with high connectivity. Both these features are likely to be correlated with population persistence. The analyses were successful in maintaining a high proportion of the connectivity of narrow-range species, and large total amounts of the connectivity of wider-range species over 10% of the land surface of Great Britain. 3Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP , high priority) species of one taxonomic group were not particularly good surrogates (indicators) for BAP species of other taxonomic groups. Hence, maintaining population concentrations of one taxonomic group did not guarantee doing likewise for other taxa. 4Species with narrow geographic ranges were most effective at predicting conservation success for other species, probably because they represent the range of environmental conditions required by other species. 5Synthesis and applications. This study identifies landscape-scale priority areas for conservation of priority species from several taxonomic groups, using the Zonation software. ,Indicator groups' were only partially successful as predictors of priority areas for other taxonomic groups, and therefore, the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation should include information from all taxonomic groups available. Larger areas should be protected to account for species not included in the analyses. Conservation solutions based on data for many different species, and particularly those species with narrowly defined ranges, appear to be most effective at protecting other rare taxa. [source] The tripartite biogeographical index: a new tool for quantifying spatio-temporal differences in distribution patternsJOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, Issue 4 2006Tom Schils Abstract Aims, First, to develop an index that quantifies biogeographical patterns based on the basic descriptors of presence/absence distribution patterns (F, frequency; C, connectivity; G, grouping). Second, to test the proposed biogeographical index on a data set of macrophyte communities in the Arabian Sea using distribution data of macro-algae and seagrasses throughout the Indian Ocean. Location, Arabian Sea (regional macrophyte community data) and the larger Indian Ocean (oceanic distribution data). Methods, The proposed index is derived from the Tulloss tripartite similarity index. The tripartite biogeographical index (TBI = ,F × C × G) is calculated for a specific taxon and incorporates several fundamental parameters of presence/absence data in grid cell (block) patterns. TBI accounts for the relative abundance of a taxon, the average grouping of its occurrences, the average of minimal absence intervals between taxon presences and the largest coherent cluster of taxon occurrences, and also incorporates dispersal aspects. The macrophytes from the case study are among the best documented marine organisms in the Indian Ocean. The regional distribution data from the Arabian Sea result from exhaustive species lists from Masirah Island (Oman) and the Socotra Archipelago (Yemen). Results, TBI values fit a linear scale corresponding to the proportional presence and the distributional spread of taxa within a given geographical area. The three functions that constitute TBI can be evaluated separately or in association with TBI, to give detailed information on the important factors that characterize the biogeographical distribution of a taxon (or larger entities consisting of multiple taxa such as communities). The case study on Arabian macrophytes clarifies the use and explanatory power of the index. Main conclusions, The biogeographical descriptors can be combined into an index which accurately quantifies taxon occurrences and distribution types on a single linear scale from rare/scattered to abundant/grouped. Together with its three functions, the index allows for a non-arbitrary selection of taxa and taxon groupings based on their distribution pattern. The analysis of TBI values for the Arabian macrophyte communities confirms previous biogeographical findings and enables more detailed statistical analyses of the distribution data. [source] Microsatellite markers for woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) and their amplification in other New World primates (Primates: Platyrrhini)MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, Issue 2 2004Anthony Di Fiore Abstract Seven polymorphic microsatellite loci were identified for woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) from an ,enriched' genomic library. For a wild population of 66 animals, these markers averaged over 10 alleles per locus and provided a combined probability for excluding a random individual from parentage of over 98%. These loci were screened in up to 13 other genera of New World monkeys, and many were variable in multiple taxa. Few other platyrrhine-specific microsatellite markers have been identified; thus, these loci should prove valuable for studying the population genetic structure and mating system not just of Lagothrix but also of other neotropical primates. [source] Brief communication: Is variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi sample too high to be from a single species?AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Issue 3 2005Sang-Hee Lee Abstract This study uses data resampling to test the null hypothesis that the degree of variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi hominid sample is within the range variation of a single species. The statistical significance of the variation in the Dmanisi sample is examined using simulated distributions based on comparative samples of modern humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. Results show that it is unlikely to find the maximum difference observed in the Dmanisi sample in distributions of female-female pairs from comparative single-species samples. Given that two sexes are represented, the difference in the Dmanisi sample is not enough to reject the null hypothesis of a single species. Results of this study suggest no compelling reason to invoke multiple taxa to explain variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] A tale of two analyses: estimating the consequences of shifts in hexapod diversificationBIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, Issue 1 2003PETER J. MAYHEW I present a novel descriptive (non-statistical) method to help identify the location and importance of shifts in diversification across a phylogeny. The method first estimates radiation rates across terminal higher taxa and then subjects these rates to a parsimony analysis across the phylogeny. The reconstructions define the magnitude, direction and influence of past shifts in realized diversification rates across nodes. I apply the method to data on the extant hexapod orders. The results indicate that the Coleoptera (beetles) and Diptera (flies) have contributed large upward shifts in diversification tendency, without which, under the model employed, global species richness would be reduced by 20% and 6%, respectively. The origin of Neoptera (insects with wing flexion), identified elsewhere as a significant radiation, may represent a large positive, a large negative or zero influence on current species richness, depending on the assumed phylogeny and parsimony method. The most influential radiations are attributable to the origin of the Eumetabola (insects with complete metamorphosis plus bugs and their relatives) and Pterygota (winged insects), but there is presently only weak evidence that they represent significant shifts in underlying diversification tendency. These analyses support some but not all results of previous phylogenetic analyses and the identity of the most important shift therefore remains elusive. New methodology involving comparisons across multiple taxa is likely to be necessary. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 23,36. [source] | ||||||||||