Home About us Contact | |||
Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists (muscarinic + receptor_antagonist)
Selected AbstractsMaximizing anticholinergic therapy for overactive bladder: has the ceiling been reached?BJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2007Scott A. MacDiarmid SUMMARY Urinary incontinence affects an estimated 20,33% of adults the USA and 55% of the country's elderly [1], having a more substantial impact on the physical and mental dimension of quality of life than other common chronic diseases. Muscarinic receptor antagonists, including oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium chloride, darifenacin, and solifenacin, are front-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB), with an efficacy of 65,75% in reducing major symptoms. Strategies to increase the therapeutic index have included behavioural therapy, flexible dosing, and dose escalation, as well as newer formulations that reduce anticholinergic side-effects. Among approved OAB agents, the oxybutynin transdermal-delivery system has been associated with a lower incidence of dry mouth than immediate- and extended-release formulations of traditional agents. With a low propensity for drug interactions and dry mouth, it is a likely candidate for older patients taking multiple medications. The transdermal patch bypasses systemic and first-pass metabolism, avoiding higher plasma concentrations of the active metabolite (N -desethyloxybutynin) thought to be associated with dry mouth symptoms. Anticholinergics have a significant role to play in the management of OAB; newer drugs targeted toward muscarinic receptors, and novel delivery systems, continue to increase the therapeutic index for this condition. [source] CDP-choline increases plasma ACTH and potentiates the stimulated release of GH, TSH and LH: the cholinergic involvementFUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 5 2004Sinan Cavun Abstract In the present study, we investigated the effect of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of cytidine-5,-diphosphate (CDP) choline on plasma adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), serum growth hormone (GH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in conscious rats. The involvement of cholinergic mechanisms in these effects was also determined. In basal conditions, CDP-choline (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 ,mol, i.c.v.) increased plasma ACTH levels dose- and time-dependently, but it did not affect the TSH, GH, FSH and LH levels. In stimulated conditions, i.c.v. administration of CDP-choline (1 ,mol, i.c.v.) produced an increase in clonidine-stimulated GH, thyrotyropin-releasing hormone (TRH)-stimulated TSH, LH-releasing hormone (LHRH)-stimulated LH, but not FSH levels. Injection of equimolar dose of choline (1 ,mol, i.c.v.) produced similar effects on hormone levels, but cytidine (1 ,mol, i.c.v.) failed to alter plasma levels of these hormones. Pretreatment with hemicholinium-3, a neuronal high affinity choline uptake inhibitor, (20 ,g, i.c.v.) completely blocked the observed hormone responses to CDP-choline. The increase in plasma ACTH levels induced by CDP-choline (1 ,mol, i.c.v.) was abolished by pretreatment with mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, (50 ,g, i.c.v.) but not atropine, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, (10 ,g, i.c.v.). The increase in stimulated levels of serum TSH by CDP-choline (1 ,mol, i.c.v.) was blocked by atropine but not by mecamylamine pretreatment. However, CDP-choline induced increases in serum GH and LH levels were greatly attenuated by both atropine and mecamylamine pretreatments. The results show that CDP-choline can increase plasma ACTH and produce additional increases in serum levels of TSH, GH and LH stimulated by TRH, clonidine and LHRH, respectively. The activation of central cholinergic system, mainly through the presynaptic mechanisms, was involved in these effects. Central nicotinic receptors solely mediated the increase in plasma ACTH levels while the activation of central muscarinic receptors was involved in the increase in TSH levels. Both muscarinic and nicotinic receptor activations, separately, mediated the increases in serum GH and LH levels after CDP-choline. [source] Regulation of rat mesencephalic GABAergic neurones through muscarinic receptorsTHE JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 2 2004François J. Michel Central dopamine neurones are involved in regulating cognitive and motor processes. Most of these neurones are located in the ventral mesencephalon where they receive abundant intrinsic and extrinsic GABAergic input. Cholinergic neurones, originating from mesopontine nuclei, project profusely in the mesencephalon where they preferentially synapse onto local GABAergic neurones. The physiological role of this cholinergic innervation of GABAergic neurones remains to be determined, but these observations raise the hypothesis that ACh may regulate dopamine neurones indirectly through GABAergic interneurones. Using a mesencephalic primary culture model, we studied the impact of cholinergic agonists on mesencephalic GABAergic neurones. ACh increased the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs (151 ± 49%). Selective activation of muscarinic receptors increased the firing rate of isolated GABAergic neurones by 67 ± 13%. The enhancement in firing rate was Ca2+ dependent since inclusion of BAPTA in the pipette blocked it, actually revealing a decrease in firing rate accompanied by membrane hyperpolarization. This inhibitory action was prevented by tertiapin, a blocker of GIRK-type K+ channels. In addition to its excitatory somatodendritic effect, activation of muscarinic receptors also acted presynaptically, inhibiting the amplitude of unitary GABAergic synaptic currents. Both the enhancement in spontaneous IPSC frequency and presynaptic inhibition were abolished by 4-DAMP (100 nm), a preferential M3 muscarinic receptor antagonist. The presence of M3-like receptors on mesencephalic GABAergic neurones was confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Taken together, these results demonstrate that mesencephalic GABAergic neurones can be regulated directly through muscarinic receptors. Our findings provide new data that should be helpful in better understanding the influence of local GABAergic neurones during cholinergic activation of mesencephalic circuits. [source] Disparate cholinergic currents in rat principal trigeminal sensory nucleus neurons mediated by M1 and M2 receptors: a possible mechanism for selective gating of afferent sensory neurotransmissionEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 12 2006Kristi A. Kohlmeier Abstract Neurons situated in the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus (PSTN) convey orofacial sensory inputs to thalamic relay regions and higher brain centres, and the excitability of these ascending tract cells is modulated across sleep/wakefulness states and during pain conditions. Moreover, acetylcholine release changes profoundly across sleep/wakefulness states and ascending sensory neurotransmission is altered by cholinergic agonists. An intriguing possibility is, therefore, that cholinergic mechanisms mediate such state-dependent modulation of PSTN tract neurons. We tested the hypotheses that cholinergic agonists can modulate PSTN cell excitability and that such effects are mediated by muscarinic receptor subtypes, using patch-clamp methods in rat and mouse. In all examined cells, carbachol elicited an electrophysiological response that was independent of action potential generation as it persisted in the presence of tetrodotoxin. Responses were of three types: depolarization, hyperpolarization or a biphasic response consisting of hyperpolarization followed by depolarization. In voltage-clamp mode, carbachol evoked corresponding inward, outward or biphasic currents. Moreover, immunostaining for the vesicle-associated choline transporter showed cholinergic innervation of the PSTN. Using muscarinic receptor antagonists, we found that carbachol-elicited PSTN neuron hyperpolarization was mediated by M2 receptors and depolarization, in large part, by M1 receptors. These data suggest that acetylcholine acting on M1 and M2 receptors may contribute to selective excitability enhancement or depression in individual, rostrally projecting sensory neurons. Such selective gating effects via cholinergic input may play a functional role in modulation of ascending sensory transmission, including across behavioral states typified by distinct cholinergic tone, e.g. sleep/wakefulness arousal levels or neuropathic pain conditions. [source] Metyrapone-Induced Glucocorticoid Depletion Modulates Tyrosine Hydroxylase and Phenylethanolamine N -Methyltransferase Gene Expression in the Rat Adrenal Gland by a Noncholinergic Transsynaptic ActivationJOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, Issue 1 2003C. Laborie Abstract The hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone system and the sympathetic nervous system are anatomically and functionally interconnected and hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis contribute to the regulation of catecholaminergic systems. To investigate the role of glucocorticoids on activity of the adrenal gland, we analysed plasma and adrenal catecholamines, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and phenylethanolamine N -methyltransferase (PNMT) mRNA expression in rats injected with metyrapone or dexamethasone. Metyrapone-treated rats had significantly lower epinephrine and higher norepinephrine production than control rats. Metyrapone increased TH protein synthesis and TH mRNA expression whereas its administration did not affect PNMT mRNA expression. Dexamethasone restored plasma and adrenal epinephrine concentrations and increased PNMT mRNA levels, which is consistent with an absolute requirement of glucocorticoids for PNMT expression. Adrenal denervation completely abolished the metyrapone-induced TH mRNA expression. Blockage of cholinergic neurotransmission by nicotinic or muscarinic receptor antagonists did not prevent the metyrapone-induced rise in TH mRNA. Finally, pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) adrenal content was not affected by metyrapone. These results provide evidence that metyrapone-induced corticosterone depletion elicits transsynaptic TH activation, implying noncholinergic neurotransmission. This may involve neuropeptides other than PACAP. [source] Endothelin-1 increases cholinergic nerve-mediated contraction of human bronchi via tachykinin synthesis inductionBRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 7 2001Bruno D'Agostino In some asthmatics, muscarinic receptor antagonists are effective in limiting bronchoconstrictor response, suggesting an abnormal cholinergic drive in these subjects. There is a growing body of evidences indicating that cholinergic neurotransmission is also enhanced by endothelin-1 (ET-1) in rabbit bronchi, mouse trachea and in human isolated airway preparations. We investigated the role of secondary mediators in ET-1 induced potentiation of cholinergic nerve-mediated contraction in human bronchi, in particular the possible role of neuropeptides in this phenomenon. Bronchial tissues after endothelin treatment were exposed to a standard electrical field stimulation (EFS) (30% of EFS 30Hz)-induced contraction. In addition, in some experiments, preparations were treated with a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist and subsequently exposed to the same protocol. HPLC and RIA were performed on organ bath fluid samples. Moreover, the human bronchi were used for the ,-PPT (preprotachykinin) mRNA extraction and semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT , PCR), prior to and 30 , 40 min following ET-1 challenge. The selective tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, SR48968, was effective to reduce ET-1 potentiation of EFS mediated contraction. HPLC or RIA showed significant increased quantities of NKA in organ bath effluents after EFS stimulation in bronchi pretreated with ET-1. Finally, ,-PPT mRNA level after stimulation of bronchi with ET-1 was increased about 2 fold respect to control untreated bronchi. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that, at least in part, the ET-1 potentiation of cholinergic nerve-mediated contraction is mediated by tachykinin release, suggesting that in addition to nerves, several type of cells, such as airway smooth muscle cell, may participate to neuropeptide production. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 134, 1447,1454; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704395 [source] |