			Home About us Contact

Monitoring Equipment (monitoring + equipment)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	85%

Selected Abstracts

In situ on-line toxicity biomonitoring in water: Recent developments

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY & CHEMISTRY, Issue 9 2006
Almut Gerhardt
Abstract ,In situ on-line biomonitoring is an emerging branch of aquatic biomonitoring. On-line biomonitoring systems use behavioral and/or physiological stress responses of caged test organisms exposed in situ either in a bypass system or directly instream. Sudden pollution waves are detected by several existing single-species on-line biomonitors, which until now have been placed mostly in streamside laboratories. However, recent achievements have been multispecies biomonitors, mobile biomonitors for direct in-stream use, development of new instruments, new methods for data analysis and alarm generation, biomonitors for use in soil and sediment, and scientific research supporting responses as seen in on-line biomonitors by linking them to other biological and ecological effects. Mobile on-line monitoring platforms containing an array of biomonitors, biosensors, and chemical monitoring equipment might be the future trend, especially in monitoring transboundary rivers at country borders as well as in coastal zones. [source]

Treatment of Vasodepressor Carotid Sinus Syndrome with Midodrine: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 1 2005
Allan Moore MRCPI
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment of the vasodepressor form of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (carotid sinus syndrome (CSS)) with midodrine. Design: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of crossover design. Setting: A dedicated outpatient facility with access to tilt-table, digital arterial photoplethysmography, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring equipment. Participants: Ten older adults (4 male, 6 female, mean age 75, range 66,86 years) with a history of unexplained syncope who displayed an asymptomatic decrease in systolic BP (SBP) of more than 50 mmHg or a symptomatic decrease of more than 30 mmHg within 30 seconds of carotid sinus massage (CSM). Measurements: Symptom reproduction and BP and heart rate changes were evaluated after CSM in supine and semierect positions on the right and then left sides. These measurements were performed on the final day of placebo and active-treatment phases. Ambulatory 24-hour BP monitoring took place on the penultimate and final days of each treatment phase. Results: Eight patients were symptomatic after their initial CSM. The mean±standard deviation SBP decrease after initial CSM was 54±22 mmHg. Initial mean 24-hour ambulatory BP was 127/70±7/5 mmHg. Eight patients reported symptoms after CSM at the end of the placebo phase. The mean SBP decrease at the end of the placebo phase was 49±12 mmHg. The mean 24-hour ambulatory BP was 127/69±9/7 mmHg. One patient reported symptoms after CSM at the end of the active-treatment phase. The mean SBP decrease at the end of the active-treatment phase was 36±9 mmHg. The mean 24-hour ambulatory BP at the end of the treatment phase was 133/75±7/6 mmHg. The differences in symptom reporting and mean SBP decrease after CSM were both significant (P<.01 and P=.03, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this pilot study suggest that treatment of vasodepressor CSS with midodrine significantly reduced the rate of symptom reporting and attenuated SBP decreases after CSM but increased mean 24-hour ambulatory BP. [source]

Perioperative Assessment of Fetal Heart Rate and Uterine Activity

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC, GYNECOLOGIC & NEONATAL NURSING, Issue 3 2000
Maribeth Inturrisi RN
Improvements in surgical techniques and anesthesia allow women the option to schedule needed surgery during pregnancy. However, perioperative monitoring of the fetus and uterine activity remains a matter of controversy. Monitoring may allow rapid improvement of the fetal status or uterine activity when early compromise or contractions are detected. The reassurance and decreased medicolegal risks provided by perioperative monitoring may offset the cost of a perinatal nurse and use of monitoring equipment even though the drug and anesthetic effect on the fetal heart limit the benefits of monitoring. Simply providing adequate maternal respiratory support during surgery may improve the fetal pattern but will not eliminate external surgical effects. The need for additional research is described, and the role of the perinatal nurse is detailed in a suggested protocol. [source]

Iatrogenic complications and risks of nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography

MUSCLE AND NERVE, Issue 5 2003
Amer Al-Shekhlee MD
Abstract Electrodiagnostic procedures are routinely performed in patients with a variety of neuromuscular disorders. These studies are generally well tolerated and rarely thought to be associated with any significant side effects. However, needle electromyography is an invasive procedure and under certain situations has the potential to be associated with iatrogenic complications, including bleeding, infection, nerve injury, pneumothorax, and other local trauma. Similar complications are possible if needles are used for either stimulating or recording. In addition, like all other electrical devices and monitoring equipment connected to patients, electrodiagnostic testing carries the risk of stray leakage currents that under certain circumstances can result in electrical injury, especially in patients in the intensive care setting. Similarly, certain precautions are required during nerve conduction studies (NCS) in patients with pacemakers and other similar cardiac devices. In this review, we address the known and theoretical complications of NCS and needle electrode examination, and the possible methods to avoid such hazards. Muscle Nerve 27: 517,526, 2003 [source]

Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 3 2002
L. A. Rosseland
Background: Retention of urine is a common postoperative problem associated with risk of overdistention and permanent detrusor damage. Prevention of urinary retention by insertion of indwelling catheter may increase the risk of urinary infection. We have performed a reliability test of an ultrasound scanner, implemented in the postoperative monitoring equipment. Methods: Patients were monitored after different types of surgery under spinal anesthesia with an ultrasound scanner in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Patients: Patients who according to current guidelines required a urinary bladder catheter, were scanned before a catheter was inserted and urine volume was measured. These two urine volumes were compared and analyzed for agreement. Results: Nineteen female and 17 male patients were included. The mean difference between ultrasound estimates and catheter urine volume measurements was ,,21.5 mL, and limits of agreement, calculated as a 95% confidence interval, were ,,147 and +,104 mL. This means that the urine volume estimated by ultrasound was on average 21.5 mL smaller than the urine volume when the bladder was emptied. Conclusion: This study confirms a good agreement between the ultrasound scanner estimates of urinary bladder volume and urine volume measured after emptying the bladder. Nurses in the PACU could operate the ultrasound scanner after a brief instruction and training period. Considering the potentially serious long-term consequences of undiagnosed postoperative urinary retention, introducing this equipment for routine monitoring of urinary bladder volume should be considered. [source]

Survey on small animal anaesthesia

AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, Issue 9 2001
A NICHOLSON
Objective To ascertain anaesthetic practices used currently for dogs and cats in Australia. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to 4800 veterinarians throughout Australia, seeking data on numbers of dogs and cats anaesthetised per week; drug preferences for anaesthetic premedication, induction and maintenance; use of tracheal intubation, supplemental O2, nitrous oxide and anaesthetic antagonists; and types of vaporisers, breathing systems and anaesthetic monitoring devices used or available. Additional questions concerned proportions of different animal types seen in the practice, and the respondent's university and year of graduation. Results The response rate was 19%; 95% of respondents graduated from Australian universities, about half since 1985. Most responses (79%) came from mainly small animal practices. On average 16 dogs and 12 cats were anaesthetised each week. Premedication was used more often in dogs than cats, with acepromazine and atropine most favoured in both species. For anaesthetic induction, thiopentone was most preferred in dogs and alphaxalone/alphadolone in cats. Inhaled agents, especially halothane, were preferred for maintenance in both species. Most respondents usually employed tracheal intubation when using inhalational anaesthetic maintenance, but intubation rates were lower during injectable anaesthetic maintenance and a minority of respondents provided supplemental O2. Nitrous oxide was administered regularly by 13% of respondents. The agents most frequently used to speed recovery from anaesthesia were doxapram and yohimbine. The most widely used vaporisers were the Fluotec Mark III and the Stephens machine. Most (95%) respondents used a rebreathing circuit for large dogs and a non-rebreathing system was used for small dogs by 68% of respondents. Most respondents (93%) indicated some form of aid was available to monitor general anaesthesia: the three most mentioned were an apnoea alarm, oesophageal stethoscope and electrocardiogram. Conclusion Diverse approaches were evident, but there appeared to be less variation in anaesthetising dogs: premedication was more frequent and less varied in type, while thiobarbituates dominated for induction and inhalants for maintenance. Injectable maintenance techniques had substantial use in cats, but little in dogs. Evident disparity between vaporisers available and circuits used suggested either confusion in terminology or incorrect use of some vaporisers in-circuit. While most respondents used monitoring equipment or a dedicated observer to invigilate anaesthesia, the common reliance on apnoea alarms is of concern, because of unproven reliability and accuracy. [source]

Results from the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, Issue thesis2 2007
Jens Christian Norregaard MD
Abstract It is widely accepted that cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation is a highly effective and successful procedure. However, quality assessments and studies of effectiveness should still be undertaken. As with any surgical treatment modality, complications may occur, leading to suboptimal outcomes, additional health costs and deterioration in patients' functional capacity. International variation in clinical practice patterns and outcomes can serve as important pointers in the attempt to identify areas amenable to improvements in quality and cost-effectiveness. Once demonstrated, similar clinical results obtained in different health care systems can improve the level of confidence in a clinical standard against which the quality of care can be evaluated. The International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study was established in 1992. The objective of this international comparative research project was to compare cataract management, outcomes of surgery and quality of care in four international sites. The study was conducted in the 1990s, since when many developments and refinements have emerged within cataract surgery. The actual figures reported in this thesis may no longer be of specific relevance as a decade has passed since their collection. However, the research questions and methods used in the study are still highly important and justify the publication of this report. The report deals with problems related to quality assessment, benchmarking, and the establishment and design of nationwide clinical databases , issues that are currently the focus of much attention. Moreover, the problems related to cross-national comparisons are increasingly relevant as more international databases are established. The study makes suggestions on how to report and compare objective as well as subjective criteria for surgery. The issue of how to report subjective criteria is a particular subject of current discussion. Four sites with high-quality health care systems were examined in this study: the USA, Denmark, the Province of Manitoba (Canada), and Barcelona (Spain). The design of the international research programme was based on methods developed by the US National Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study conducted by the US Cataract Patients Outcomes Research Team. The International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study comprised three separate studies: a survey of ophthalmologists; a prospective cohort study, and a retrospective register-based cohort study. The survey study was based on data generated by a self-administered questionnaire completed by ophthalmologists in the four study areas. The questionnaire examined routine clinical practice involving patients considered for cataract surgery, and included questions on anaesthesia, monitoring and surgical techniques. The prospective cohort study was a large-scale, longitudinal observational study of patients undergoing first-eye cataract surgery in each study site. Patients were sampled consecutively from multiple clinics and followed for 4 months postoperatively. The retrospective cohort study was based on the Danish National Patient Register and claims data from the USA. This study could not be carried out in Barcelona or Manitoba as no suitable administrative databases were available. The papers based on register databases deal with retinal detachment and endophthalmitis but are not included in this thesis as the material was previously reported in my PhD thesis. The application of the studies was highly co-ordinated among the four sites and similar methods and instruments were used for data collection. The development of the data collection strategy, questionnaires, clinical data forms and data analyses were co-ordinated through weekly telephone conferences, annual in-person conferences, correspondence by mail or fax, and the exchange of sas programs and data files via the Internet. The survey study was based on responses from 1121 ophthalmologists in the four sites and results were presented in two papers. Within the previous year the participating ophthalmologists had performed a total of 212 428 cataract surgeries. With regard to preoperative ophthalmic testing, the present study reveals that refraction, fundus examination and A-scanning were performed routinely by most surgeons in all four sites. Other tests were reported to be performed routinely by some surgeons. It is unclear why any surgeon would use these other tests routinely in cataract patients with no ocular comorbidity. It appears that if this recommendation from the US Clinical Practice Guidelines Panel was broadly accepted, the use of these procedures and costs of care could be reduced, especially in Barcelona, the USA and Canada. Restricted use of medical screening tests was reported in Denmark. If this restricted screening were to be implemented in the USA, Canada and Barcelona, it would have significant resource implications. The most striking finding concerned the difference in monitoring practice between Denmark and each of the other three sites. In Denmark, monitoring equipment is seldom used and only occasionally is an anaesthesiologist present during cataract surgery. By contrast, in the other study sites, the presence of an anaesthesiologist using monitoring equipment is the norm. Adopting the Danish model in other sites would potentially yield significant cost savings. The results represent part of the background data used to inform the decision to conduct the two large-scale, multicentre Studies of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery. The current study is an example of how surveys of clinical practice can pinpoint topics that need to be examined in randomized clinical trials. For the second study, 1422 patients were followed from prior to surgery until 4 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, a medical history was obtained and an ophthalmic examination of each patient performed. After consent had been obtained, patients were contacted for an in-depth telephone interview. The interview was repeated 4 months postoperatively. The interview included the VF-14, an index of functional impairment in patients with cataract. Perioperative data were available for 1344 patients (95%). The 4-month postoperative interview and clinical examination were completed by 1284 patients (91%). Main reasons for not re-evaluating patients were: surgery was cancelled (3%); refusal to participate (2%); lost to follow-up (1%), and death or being too sick (1%). The results have been presented in several papers, of which four are included in this thesis. One paper compared the preoperative clinical status of patients across the four sites and showed differences in both visual acuity (VA) and VF-14 measures. The VF-14 is a questionnaire scoring disability related to vision. The findings suggest that indications for surgery in comparable patients were similar in the USA and Denmark and were more liberal than in Manitoba and Barcelona. The results highlight the need to control for patient case mix when making comparisons among providers in a clinical database. This information is important when planning national databases that aim to compare quality of care. A feasible method may be to use one of the recently developed systems for case severity grading before cataract surgery. In another paper, perioperative clinical practice and rates of early complications following cataract surgery were compared across the four health care systems. Once again, the importance of controlling for case mix was demonstrated. Significant differences in clinical practice patterns were revealed, suggesting a general trend towards slower diffusion of new medical technology in Europe compared with North America. There were significant differences across sites in rates of intra- and early postoperative events. The most important differences were seen for rates of capsular rupture, hyphaema, corneal oedema and elevated pressure. Rates of these adverse events might potentially be minimized if factors responsible for the observed differences could be identified. Our results point towards the need for further research in this area. In a third paper, 4-month VA outcomes were compared across the four sites. When mean postoperative VA or crude proportions of patients with a visual outcome of <,0.67 were compared across sites, a much poorer outcome was seen in Barcelona. However, higher age, poorer general health status, lower preoperative VA and presence of ocular comorbidity were found to be significant risk factors associated with increased likelihood of poorer postoperative VA. The proportions of patients with these risk factors varied across sites. After controlling for the different distributions of these factors, no significant difference remained across the four sites regarding risk of a poor visual outcome. Once again the importance of controlling for case mix was demonstrated. In the fourth paper, we examined the postoperative VF-14 score as a measure of visual outcomes for cataract surgery in health care settings in four countries. Controlling for case mix was also necessary for this variable. After controlling for patient case mix, the odds for achieving an optimal visual function outcome were similar across the four sites. Age, gender and coexisting ocular pathology were important predictors of visual functional outcome. Despite what seemed to be an optimal surgical outcome, a third of patients still experienced visual disabilities in everyday life. A measure of the VF-14 might help to elucidate this issue, especially in any study evaluating the benefits of cataract surgery in a public health care context. [source]