Home  About us  Contact
 

Mixing Sequence (mixing + sequence)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Polymers and Materials Science75%

Selected Abstracts

Comparison of polyamide 66,organoclay binary and ternary nanocomposites

ADVANCES IN POLYMER TECHNOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Miray Mert
Abstract Polyamide 66,Lotader® 2210 blends (95/5 w/w), polyamide 66,Cloisite® 15A binary nanocomposites (98/2 w/w), and polyamide 66,Lotader® 2210,Cloisite® 15A ternary nanocomposites (93/5/2 w/w) were prepared by twin-screw extrusion, and the changes in mechanical properties, morphology, and flow properties of the materials prepared by different mixing sequences were investigated in this study. Lotader® 2210, which is a random terpolymer of ethylene, butyl acrylate, and maleic anhydride, was used as the impact modifier for polyamide 66 blends as well as polyamide 66 based nanocomposites. The best dispersion level, highest mechanical properties, highest viscosity values, and smallest elastomeric domain sizes were obtained for the mixing sequence in which all the components forming the ternary nanocomposites were compounded simultaneously. Incorporation sequence of either the organoclay or the impact modifier into the polymeric matrix was varied in the other mixing sequences, and this resulted in poorer distribution of the organoclay platelets and elastomeric domains in the matrix owing to insufficient shear intensity applied on the components in a single extrusion step. Toughness values of the ternary nanocomposites were improved compared with the binary nanocomposites upon addition of the impact modifier into polymer,organoclay combination. It was concluded that the compounding sequence of the components plays a significant role in the dispersion of organoclay and the properties of the nanocomposites, because it directly affects the interaction between the different phases. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 28:155,164, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/adv.20158 [source]

Polyamide 66 binary and ternary nanocomposites: Mechanical and morphological properties

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, Issue 1 2010
Miray Mert
Abstract Polyamide 66 (PA 66)/impact modifier blends and polyamide/organoclay binary and PA 66/organoclay/impact modifier ternary nanocomposites were prepared by the melt-compounding method, and the effects of the mixing sequences on the morphology and mechanical and flow properties were investigated. Lotader AX8840 and Lotader AX8900 were used as impact modifiers. The concentrations of the impact modifiers and the organoclay (Cloisite 25A) were maintained at 2 and 5 wt %, respectively. Both the binary and ternary nanocomposites displayed high tensile strength and Young's modulus values compared to the PA 66/impact modifier blends. Decreases occurred in the strength and stiffness of the binary nanocomposites upon incorporation of the elastomeric materials into the polymeric matrix. In general, the mixing sequence in which all three ingredients were added simultaneously and extruded twice (the All-S mixing sequence) exhibited the most enhanced mechanical properties in comparison with the mixing sequences in which two of the components were extruded in the first extrusion step and the third ingredient was added in the second extrusion step. The mechanical test results were in accordance with the organoclay dispersion. The impact strength was highly affected by the elastomeric domain sizes, interdomain distances, interfacial interactions, and organoclay delamination. The smallest elastomeric domain size was obtained for the All-S mixing sequence, whereas the elastomeric domain sizes of the other mixing sequences were quite close to each other. Drastic variations were not observed between the melt viscosities of the ternary nanocomposites prepared with different mixing sequences. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010 [source]

Flow behaviour and microstructure evolution in novel SiO2/PP/LCP ternary composites: effects of filler properties and mixing sequence

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 2 2003
Mun Wai Lee
Abstract When silica (SiO2) fillers were introduced into the polypropylene (PP) and liquid-crystalline polymer (LCP) blend, it was found that the mixing sequence, the filler size, and the filler surface nature affected the rheology of the composites and the morphology of the LCP phase in the ternary composite. In particular, the compatibility between the filler and the PP matrix was found to exert a strong influence on the droplet-fibril transition. The incorporation of the hydrophobic silica to the LCP/PP blend facilitated the fibrillation of LCP because the hydrophobic filler demonstrated affinity towards the hydrophobic PP matrix. The preferential residence of the hydrophobic silica in the PP phase would minimise the LCP domain disruption leading to the formation of LCP fibrils with high aspect ratios. The use of fine filler and in situ blending, which promoted the filler,LCP interaction, could prevent coalescence, inhibit deformation and hinder fibril development as well. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry [source]

Comparison of polyamide 66,organoclay binary and ternary nanocomposites

ADVANCES IN POLYMER TECHNOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Miray Mert
Abstract Polyamide 66,Lotader® 2210 blends (95/5 w/w), polyamide 66,Cloisite® 15A binary nanocomposites (98/2 w/w), and polyamide 66,Lotader® 2210,Cloisite® 15A ternary nanocomposites (93/5/2 w/w) were prepared by twin-screw extrusion, and the changes in mechanical properties, morphology, and flow properties of the materials prepared by different mixing sequences were investigated in this study. Lotader® 2210, which is a random terpolymer of ethylene, butyl acrylate, and maleic anhydride, was used as the impact modifier for polyamide 66 blends as well as polyamide 66 based nanocomposites. The best dispersion level, highest mechanical properties, highest viscosity values, and smallest elastomeric domain sizes were obtained for the mixing sequence in which all the components forming the ternary nanocomposites were compounded simultaneously. Incorporation sequence of either the organoclay or the impact modifier into the polymeric matrix was varied in the other mixing sequences, and this resulted in poorer distribution of the organoclay platelets and elastomeric domains in the matrix owing to insufficient shear intensity applied on the components in a single extrusion step. Toughness values of the ternary nanocomposites were improved compared with the binary nanocomposites upon addition of the impact modifier into polymer,organoclay combination. It was concluded that the compounding sequence of the components plays a significant role in the dispersion of organoclay and the properties of the nanocomposites, because it directly affects the interaction between the different phases. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Adv Polym Techn 28:155,164, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/adv.20158 [source]

Polyamide 66 binary and ternary nanocomposites: Mechanical and morphological properties

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, Issue 1 2010
Miray Mert
Abstract Polyamide 66 (PA 66)/impact modifier blends and polyamide/organoclay binary and PA 66/organoclay/impact modifier ternary nanocomposites were prepared by the melt-compounding method, and the effects of the mixing sequences on the morphology and mechanical and flow properties were investigated. Lotader AX8840 and Lotader AX8900 were used as impact modifiers. The concentrations of the impact modifiers and the organoclay (Cloisite 25A) were maintained at 2 and 5 wt %, respectively. Both the binary and ternary nanocomposites displayed high tensile strength and Young's modulus values compared to the PA 66/impact modifier blends. Decreases occurred in the strength and stiffness of the binary nanocomposites upon incorporation of the elastomeric materials into the polymeric matrix. In general, the mixing sequence in which all three ingredients were added simultaneously and extruded twice (the All-S mixing sequence) exhibited the most enhanced mechanical properties in comparison with the mixing sequences in which two of the components were extruded in the first extrusion step and the third ingredient was added in the second extrusion step. The mechanical test results were in accordance with the organoclay dispersion. The impact strength was highly affected by the elastomeric domain sizes, interdomain distances, interfacial interactions, and organoclay delamination. The smallest elastomeric domain size was obtained for the All-S mixing sequence, whereas the elastomeric domain sizes of the other mixing sequences were quite close to each other. Drastic variations were not observed between the melt viscosities of the ternary nanocomposites prepared with different mixing sequences. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010 [source]