Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Mixed Glial Cultures (mixed + glial_culture)
Selected AbstractsEarly stages of oligodendrocyte development in the embryonic murine spinal cord proceed normally in the absence of Hoxa2GLIA, Issue 1 2004Danette J. Nicolay Abstract Recent discoveries have enhanced our knowledge of the transcriptional control of oligodendrocyte (OG) development. In particular, the transcription factors (TFs) Olig2, Pax6, and Nkx2.2 have been shown to be important in the specification and/or maturation of the OG lineage. Although numerous other TFs are expressed by OGs, little is known regarding their role(s) in oligodendrogenesis. One such TF is the homeobox gene Hoxa2, which was recently shown to be expressed by O4+ pro-oligodendrocytes. The objectives of this study were to examine the expression of Hoxa2 during the early stages of OG development, as well as to determine whether Hoxa2 is required for specification and/or early maturation of OGs. Immunocytochemical analysis of primary mixed glial cultures demonstrated that Hoxa2 was expressed throughout oligodendrogenesis, diminishing only with the acquisition of a myelinating phenotype. Serial transverse spinal cord sections from embryonic days 12.5, 14.25, 16, and 18 Hoxa2+/+, Hoxa2+/,, and Hoxa2,/, mice were subjected to single and double immunohistochemical analysis in order to examine Hoxa2, Olig2, Nkx2.2, and Pax6 expression profiles. Results obtained from Hoxa2+/+ and Hoxa2+/, mice suggested that Hoxa2 was expressed by migratory oligodendroglial cells. In addition, comparison of spinal cord sections obtained from Hoxa2+/+, Hoxa2+/,, and Hoxa2,/, mice suggested that specification and early maturation of OGs proceeded normally in the absence of Hoxa2, since there were no obvious alterations in the expression patterns of Olig2, Nkx2.2, and/or Pax6. Hence, although Hoxa2 is expressed throughout OG development, it does not appear to be critical for early stages of oligodendrogenesis in the murine spinal cord. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Differential gene expression in LPS/IFN, activated microglia and macrophages: in vitro versus in vivoJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 2009Christoph D. Schmid Abstract Two different macrophage populations contribute to CNS neuroinflammation: CNS-resident microglia and CNS-infiltrating peripheral macrophages. Markers distinguishing these two populations in tissue sections have not been identified. Therefore, we compared gene expression between LPS (lipopolysaccharide)/interferon (IFN),-treated microglia from neonatal mixed glial cultures and similarly treated peritoneal macrophages. Fifteen molecules were identified by quantative PCR (qPCR) as being enriched from 2-fold to 250-fold in cultured neonatal microglia when compared with peritoneal macrophages. Only three of these molecules (C1qA, Trem2, and CXCL14) were found by qPCR to be also enriched in adult microglia isolated from LPS/IFN,-injected CNS when compared with infiltrating peripheral macrophages from the same CNS. The discrepancy between the in vitro and in vivo qPCR data sets was primarily because of induced expression of the ,microglial' molecules (such as the tolerance associated transcript, Tmem176b) in CNS-infiltrating macrophages. Bioinformatic analysis of the ,19000 mRNAs detected by TOGA gene profiling confirmed that LPS/IFN,-activated microglia isolated from adult CNS displayed greater similarity in total gene expression to CNS-infiltrating macrophages than to microglia isolated from unmanipulated healthy adult CNS. In situ hybridization analysis revealed that nearly all microglia expressed high levels of C1qA, while subsets of microglia expressed Trem2 and CXCL14. Expression of C1qA and Trem2 was limited to microglia, while large numbers of GABA+ neurons expressed CXCL14. These data suggest that (i) CNS-resident microglia are heterogeneous and thus a universal microglia-specific marker may not exist; (ii) the CNS micro-environment plays significant roles in determining the phenotypes of both CNS-resident microglia and CNS-infiltrating macrophages; (iii) the CNS microenvironment may contribute to immune privilege by inducing macrophage expression of anti-inflammatory molecules. [source] Modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-, activity by N -acetyl cysteine attenuates inhibition of oligodendrocyte development in lipopolysaccharide stimulated mixed glial culturesJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 3 2008Manjeet K. Paintlia Abstract Glial cells secrete proinflammatory mediators in the brain in response to exogenous stimuli such as infection and injury. Previously, we documented that systemic maternal lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-exposure at embryonic gestation day 18 causes oligodendrocyte (OL)-injury/hypomyelination in the developing brain which can be attenuated by N -acetyl cysteine (NAC; precursor of glutathione). The present study delineates the underlying mechanism of NAC-mediated attenuation of inhibition of OL development in LPS-stimulated mixed glial cultures. Factors released by LPS-stimulated mixed glial cultures inhibited OL development as shown by decrease in both proliferation 3bromo-deoxyuridine+/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan,NG2+, hereafter BrdU+/NG+ and differentiation (O4+ and myelin basic protein+) of OL-progenitors. Correspondingly, an impairment of peroxisomal proliferation was shown by a decrease in the level of peroxisomal proteins in the developing OLs following exposure to LPS-conditioned media (LCM). Both NAC and WY14643, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-, agonist attenuated these LCM-induced effects in OL-progenitors. Similar to WY14643, NAC attenuated LCM-induced inhibition of PPAR-, activity in developing OLs. Studies conducted with cytokines and diamide (a thiol-depleting agent) confirmed that cytokines are active agents in LCM which may be responsible for inhibition of OL development via peroxisomal dysfunction and induction of oxidative stress. These findings were further corroborated by similar treatment of developing OLs generated from PPAR-,(,/,) and wild-type mice or B12 oligodendroglial cells co-transfected with PPAR-, small interfering RNAs/pTK-PPREx3-Luc plasmids. Collectively, these data provide evidence that the modulation of PPAR-, activity, thus peroxisomal function by NAC attenuates LPS-induced glial factors-mediated inhibition of OL development suggesting new therapeutic interventions to prevent the devastating effects of maternal infections. [source] Expression of interleukin-1 receptors and their role in interleukin-1 actions in murine microglial cellsJOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, Issue 4 2002Emmanuel Pinteaux Abstract Interleukin (IL)-1 is an important mediator of acute brain injury and inflammation, and has been implicated in chronic neurodegeneration. The main source of IL-1 in the CNS is microglial cells, which have also been suggested as targets for its action. However, no data exist demonstrating expression of IL-1 receptors [IL-1 type-I receptor (IL-1RI), IL-1 type-II receptor (IL-1RII) and IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP)] on microglia. In the present study we investigated whether microglia express IL-1 receptors and whether they present target or modulatory properties for IL-1 actions. RT,PCR analysis demonstrated lower expression of IL-1RI and higher expression of IL-1RII mRNAs in mouse microglial cultures compared with mixed glial or pure astrocyte cultures. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) caused increased expression of IL-1RI, IL-1RII and IL-1RAcP mRNAs, induced the release of IL-1,, IL-6 and prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2), and activated nuclear factor ,B (NF-,B) and the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) p38, and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2), but not c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) in microglial cultures. In comparison, IL-1, induced the release of PGE2, IL-6 and activated NF-,B, p38, JNK and ERK1/2 in mixed glial cultures, but failed to induce any of these responses in microglial cell cultures. IL-1, also failed to affect LPS-primed microglial cells. Interestingly, a neutralizing antibody to IL-1RII significantly increased the concentration of IL-1, in the medium of LPS-treated microglia and exacerbated the IL-1,-induced IL-6 release in mixed glia, providing the first evidence that microglial IL-1RII regulates IL-1, actions by binding excess levels of this cytokine during brain inflammation. [source] | ||||||||||