			Home About us Contact

Menstrual Disorders (menstrual + disorders)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Menstrual disorders and their adverse symptoms at work: An emerging occupational health issue in the nursing profession

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, Issue 3 2008
Derek R. SmithArticle first published online: 4 AUG 200
Abstract Menstrual disorders and their adverse symptoms represent an important health issue for many women of child-bearing age. Aside from a deleterious effect on the individual's private life, menstrual disorders are being increasingly recognized as having significant implications at work. This is particularly relevant in occupations such as nursing, where the majority of staff is female. Various investigations have identified the prevalence, distribution, and risk factors associated with menstrual disorders, both in the general community and within the nursing profession. Overall, it is clear that menstrual disorders and their adverse symptoms represent an important occupational health challenge for modern nursing. Future interventions specifically aimed at reducing the work-related burden of these issues should be urgently considered. A more dedicated commitment from higher management regarding the overall health of nurses at work is also required. [source]

On the Association Between Valproate and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

EPILEPSIA, Issue 3 2001
Pierre Genton
Summary: Recent studies by Isojärvi et al. have raised the issue of an increased incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in women with epilepsy treated with valproate (VPA) and have proposed replacement with lamotrigine (LTG). Polycystic ovaries (PCO) are a common finding, with a prevalence >20% in the general population, and are easily detected by pelvic or vaginal ultrasonography, whereas PCOS is comparatively rare: few women with PCO have fully developed PCOS, which includes hirsutism, acne, obesity, hypofertility, hyperandrogenemia, and menstrual disorders. From an extensive review of the current literature, it appears that there are no reliable data on the actual prevalence of PCOS in normal women and in women with epilepsy. The pathogenesis of PCO is multifactorial, including genetic predisposition and the intervention of environmental factors, among which weight gain and hyperinsulinism with insulin resistance may play a part. The roles of central (hypothalamic/pituitary), peripheral, and local ovarian factors are still debated. PCO and PCOS appear to be more frequent in women with epilepsy, but there are no reliable data showing a greater prevalence after VPA. The recent studies by Isojärvi et al. may have been biased by the retrospective selection of patients. To date, there is no reason to contraindicate the use of VPA in women with epilepsy. However, patients should be informed about the risk of weight gain and its consequences. [source]

Menstrual disorders and their adverse symptoms at work: An emerging occupational health issue in the nursing profession

Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 7 2006
K Spilsbury
Objective, To investigate incidence trends and demographic, social and health factors associated with the rate of hysterectomy and morbidity outcomes in Western Australia and compare these with international studies. Design, Population-based retrospective cohort study. Setting, All hospitals in Western Australia where hysterectomies were performed from 1981 to 2003. Population, All women aged 20 years or older who underwent a hysterectomy. Methods, Statistical analysis of record-linked administrative health data. Main outcome measures, Rates, rate ratios and odds ratios for incidence measures and length of stay in hospital and odds ratios for morbidity measures. Results, The age-standardised rate of hysterectomy adjusted for the underlying prevalence of hysterectomy decreased 23% from 6.6 per 1000 woman-years (95% CI 6.4,6.9) in 1981 to 4.8 per 1000 woman-years (95% CI 4.6,4.9) in 2003. Lifetime risk of hysterectomy was estimated as 35%. In 2003, 40% of hysterectomies were abdominal. The rate of hysterectomy to treat menstrual disorders fell from 4 per 1000 woman-years in 1981 to 1 per 1000 woman-years in 1993 and has since stabilised. Low socio-economic status, having only public health insurance, nonindigenous status and living in rural or remote areas were associated with increased risk of having a hysterectomy for menstrual disorders. Indigenous women had higher rates of hysterectomy to treat gynaecological cancers compared with nonindigenous women, particularly in rural areas. The odds of a serious complication were 20% lower for vaginal hysterectomies compared with abdominal procedures. Conclusion, Western Australia has one of the highest hysterectomy rates in the world, although proportionally, significantly fewer abdominal hysterectomies are performed than in most countries. [source]

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of women's experience of a one-stop menstrual clinic in comparison with traditional gynaecology clinics

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 9 2001
Jafaru I. Abu
Objective A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the views of patients attending two types of clinics for menstrual disorders. Methods Semi-structured qualitative interview and quantitative questionnaire. Setting Five traditional general gynaecology clinics and a one-stop menstrual clinic, where investigations are performed and results given to patients on the same day. Participants Two hundred and thirty-nine women (126 from the gynaecology clinic and 113 from the menstrual clinic) were recruited into the quantitative study; 18 and 26 patients from the gynaecology and the menstrual clinic, respectively, were interviewed for the qualitative study. Main outcome measures Women's views about their care and progress towards resolution of their problem. Results Following the initial consultation, 106 (84%) of the gynaecology clinic, and 98 (87%) of the menstrual clinic patients completed the first part of the questionnaire. Of those, 75 (71%) and 79 (81%) patients from the two types of clinic, respectively, completed a follow up questionnaire one year later. There were statistically significant differences in all the components of the first part of the questionnaire (information, continuity, waiting, organisation, and limbo) in favour of the one-stop menstrual clinic. After one year, there was a statistically significant difference in one of the components, patient centeredness, but not in overall process co-ordination. The interviews showed that patients attending the menstrual clinic appreciated getting the results of their investigations on the same day. They also found the organisation of the one-stop menstrual clinic more closely suited to their needs and as a result were more likely to feel they were making progress. Conclusion Women were consistently more positive about their experience in the one-stop clinic. One-stop clinics organised to meet the needs of patients might be appropriate for other clinical conditions. The combination of quantitative and qualitative methods is an effective method of assessing patients' views of health services. [source]