Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Medication Order (medication + order)
Selected AbstractsTreatment of acute otitis media in patients with a reported penicillin allergyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 3 2000Falconer Otitis media occurs commonly in children, and is usually treated with an antibiotic. In this case report, amoxicillin was prescribed for a 6-year-old boy suffering from acute otitis media. As he had previously experienced a rash after the administration of a penicillin, the medication order was switched from amoxicillin to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). In an effort to determine whether or not this intervention was appropriate, references were found using Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and the Cochrane Library. Issues to be addressed included the need for antibiotics in acute otitis media, the comparative efficacy and tolerability of antimicrobial agents and the reliability of reported penicillin allergies. Amoxicillin and TMP/SMX were found to be first-line agents in the treatment of acute otitis media owing to their efficacy, safety and cost, with neither drug being significantly better than the other. The need to treat otitis media with antibiotics remains controversial. Reported penicillin allergies were found to be an unreliable indicator of a potentially serious reaction. In conclusion, it was found that treatment with TMP/SMX was an appropriate intervention. [source] The attitudes and beliefs of healthcare professionals on the causes and reporting of medication errors in a UK Intensive care unitANAESTHESIA, Issue 1 2007I. S. Sanghera Summary Our aim was to explore the attitudes and beliefs of healthcare professionals relating to the causes and reporting of medication errors in a UK intensive care unit. Medication errors were identified by the unit pharmacist and semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with 13 members of staff involved with 12 errors. Interviews were analysed using a model of human error theory. Staff identified many contributing factors, including poor communication and frequent interruptions. Organisational factors included lack of clarity on the responsibility of the second nurse's check for medication administration, lack of feedback on medication errors, and a common and accepted practice of administering medication without a complete medication order. Barriers to reporting included administrative paperwork and lack of encouragement by management. Greater feedback on medication errors seems essential to improve current practice and increase reporting. [source] Prescription errors in UK critical care unitsANAESTHESIA, Issue 12 2004S. A. Ridley Summary Drug prescription errors are a common cause of adverse incidents and may be largely preventable. The incidence of prescription errors in UK critical care units is unknown. The aim of this study was to collect data about prescription errors and so calculate the incidence and variation of errors nationally. Twenty-four critical care units took part in the study for a 4-week period. The total numbers of new and re-written prescriptions were recorded daily. Errors were classified according to the nature of the error. Over the 4-week period, 21 589 new prescriptions (or 15.3 new prescriptions per patient) were written. Eighty-five per cent (18 448 prescriptions) were error free, but 3141 (15%) prescriptions had one or more errors (2.2 erroneous prescriptions per patient, or 145.5 erroneous prescriptions per 1000 new prescriptions). The five most common incorrect prescriptions were for potassium chloride (10.2% errors), heparin (5.3%), magnesium sulphate (5.2%), paracetamol (3.2%) and propofol (3.1%). Most of the errors were minor or would have had no adverse effects but 618 (19.6%) errors were considered significant, serious or potentially life threatening. Four categories (not writing the order according to the British National Formulary recommendations, an ambiguous medication order, non-standard nomenclature and writing illegibly) accounted for 47.9% of all errors. Although prescription rates (and error rates) in critical care appear higher than elsewhere in hospital, the number of potentially serious errors is similar to other areas of high-risk practice. [source] Strategies to reduce medication errors with reference to older adultsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED HEALTHCARE, Issue 1 2006Brent Hodgkinson BSc (Hons) MSc GradCertPH GradCertEcon(Health) Abstract Background, In Australia, around 59% of the general population uses prescription medication with this number increasing to about 86% in those aged 65 and over and 83% of the population over 85 using two or more medications simultaneously. A recent report suggests that between 2% and 3% of all hospital admissions in Australia may be medication related with older Australians at higher risk because of higher levels of medicine intake and increased likelihood of being admitted to hospital. The most common medication errors encountered in hospitals in Australia are prescription/medication ordering errors, dispensing, administration and medication recording errors. Contributing factors to these errors have largely not been reported in the hospital environment. In the community, inappropriate drugs, prescribing errors, administration errors, and inappropriate dose errors are most common. Objectives, To present the best available evidence for strategies to prevent or reduce the incidence of medication errors associated with the prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines in the older persons in the acute, subacute and residential care settings, with specific attention to persons aged 65 years and over. Search strategy, Bibliographic databases PubMed, Embase, Current contents, The Cochrane Library and others were searched from 1986 to present along with existing health technology websites. The reference lists of included studies and reviews were searched for any additional literature. Selection criteria, Systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials and other research methods such as non-randomised controlled trials, longitudinal studies, cohort or case,control studies, or descriptive studies that evaluate strategies to identify and manage medication incidents. Those people who are involved in the prescribing, dispensing or administering of medication to the older persons (aged 65 years and older) in the acute, subacute or residential care settings were included. Where these studies were limited, evidence available on the general patient population was used. Data collection and analysis, Study design and quality were tabulated and relative risks, odds ratios, mean differences and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated from individual comparative studies containing count data where possible. All other data were presented in a narrative summary. Results, Strategies that have some evidence for reducing medication incidents are: ,,computerised physician ordering entry systems combined with clinical decision support systems; ,,individual medication supply systems when compared with other dispensing systems such as ward stock approaches; ,,use of clinical pharmacists in the inpatient setting; ,,checking of medication orders by two nurses before dispensing medication; ,,a Medication Administration Review and Safety committee; and ,,providing bedside glucose monitors and educating nurses on importance of timely insulin administration. In general, the evidence for the effectiveness of intervention strategies to reduce the incidence of medication errors is weak and high-quality controlled trials are needed in all areas of medication prescription and delivery. [source] | ||||||||||