Home About us Contact | |||
Medicare Data (medicare + data)
Selected AbstractsRacial Differences in the Receipt of Bowel Surveillance Following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer SurgeryHEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, Issue 6p2 2003Gary L. Ellison Objective. To investigate racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery in a large population of Medicare patients. Data Sources. We used a large population-based dataset: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) linked to Medicare data. Study Design. This is a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed data from 44,768 non-Hispanic white, 2,921 black, and 4,416 patients from other racial/ethnic groups, aged 65 and older at diagnosis, who had a diagnosis of local or regional colorectal cancer between 1986 and 1996, and were followed through December 31, 1998. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to investigate the relation of race and receipt of posttreatment bowel surveillance. Data Collection. Sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics were collected at the time of diagnosis for all members of the cohort. Surgery and bowel surveillance with colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema were obtained from Medicare claims using ICD-9-CM and CPT-4 codes. Principal Findings. The chance of surveillance within 18 months of surgery was 57 percent, 48 percent, and 45 percent for non-Hispanic whites, blacks, and others, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics, blacks were 25 percent less likely than whites to receive surveillance if diagnosed between 1991 and 1996 (RR=0.75, 95 percent CI=0.70,0.81). Conclusions. Elderly blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive posttreatment bowel surveillance and this result was not explained by measured racial differences in sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics. More research is needed to explore the influences of patient- and provider-level factors on racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance. [source] Patterns of Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment in Older Patients with Colon Cancer and Comorbid DementiaJOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 10 2004Supriya K. Gupta MD Objectives: To estimate patterns of colon cancer presentation, diagnosis, and treatment according to history of dementia using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Result (SEER) Medicare data. Design: Population-level cohort study. Setting: NCI's SEER-Medicare database. Participants: A total of 17,507 individuals aged 67 and older with invasive colon cancer (Stage I-IV) were identified from the 1993,1996 SEER file. Medicare files were evaluated to determine which patients had an antecedent diagnosis of dementia. Measurements: Parameters relating to the cohort's patterns of presentation and care were estimated using logistic regressions. Results: The prevalence of dementia in the cohort of newly diagnosed colon cancer patients was 6.8% (1,184/17,507). Adjusting for possible confounders, dementia patients were twice as likely to have colon cancer reported after death (i.e., autopsy or death certificate) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.31, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.79,3.00). Of those diagnosed before death (n=17,049), dementia patients were twice as likely to be diagnosed noninvasively than with tissue evaluation (i.e., positive histology) (AOR=2.02 95% CI=1.63,2.51). Of patients with Stage I -III disease (n=12,728), patients with dementia were half as likely to receive surgical resection (AOR=0.48, 95% CI=0.33,0.70). Furthermore, of those with resected Stage III colon cancer (n=3,386), dementia patients were 78% less likely to receive adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (AOR=0.22, 95% CI=0.13,0.36). Conclusion: Although the incidences of dementia and cancer rise with age, little is known about the effect of dementia on cancer presentation and treatment. Elderly colon cancer patients are less likely to receive invasive diagnostic methods or curative-intent therapies. The utility of anticancer therapies in patients with dementia merits further study. [source] Are Aggressive Treatment Strategies Less Cost-Effective for Older Patients?JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 4 2001Aggressive Care for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure, The Case of Ventilator Support OBJECTIVES: A common assumption is that life-sustaining treatments are much less cost-effective for older patients than for younger patients. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness of providing mechanical ventilation and intensive care for patients of various ages who had acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data on acute respiratory failure from Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). SETTING: Acute hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 1,005 with acute respiratory failure; 963 received ventilator support and 42 had ventilator support withheld. MEASUREMENTS: We studied 1,005 patients enrolled in a five-center study of seriously ill patients (SUPPORT) with acute respiratory failure (pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome and an Acute Physiology Score ,10) requiring ventilator support. For cost-effectiveness analyses, we estimated life expectancy based on long-term follow-up of SUPPORT patients and estimated utilities (quality-of-life weights) using time-tradeoff questions. We used hospital fiscal data and Medicare data to estimate healthcare costs. We divided patients into three age groups (<65, 65,74, and ,75 years); for each age group, we performed separate analyses for patients with a ,50% probability of surviving at least 2 months (high-risk group) and those with a> 50% probability of surviving at least 2 months (low-risk group). RESULTS: Of the 963 patients who received ventilator support, 44% were female; 48% survived 6 months; and the median (25th, 75th percentile) age was 63 (46, 75) years. For the 42 patients for whom ventilator support was withheld, the median survival was 3 days. For low-risk patients (>50% estimated 2-month survival), the incremental cost (1998 dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved by providing ventilator support and aggressive care increased across the three age groups ($32,000 for patients age <65, $44,000 for those age 65,74, and $46,000 for those age ,75). For high-risk patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness was much less favorable and was least favorable for younger patients ($130,000 for patients age <65, $100,000 for those age 65,74, and $96,000 for those age ,75). When we varied our assumptions from 50% to 200% of our baseline estimates in sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to the costs of the index hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with relatively good short-term prognoses, we found that ventilator support and aggressive care were economically worthwhile, even for patients 75 years and older. For patients with poor short-term prognoses, ventilator support and aggressive care were much less cost-effective for adults of all ages. [source] Low Back Pain in Older Adults: Are We Utilizing Healthcare Resources Wisely?PAIN MEDICINE, Issue 2 2006Debra K. Weiner MD ABSTRACT Objectives., 1) To examine recent change in prevalence and Medicare-associated charges for non-invasive/minimally invasive evaluation and treatment of nonspecific low back pain (LBP); and 2) to examine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization appropriateness in older adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Design., Two cross-sectional surveys of 1) national (1991,2002) and Pennsylvania (2000,2002) Medicare data; and 2) patients aged ,,65 years with CLBP. Setting., Outpatient data. Participants., Patients aged , 65 years with LBP. Measurements., Study 1: Outpatient national and Pennsylvania Part A Medicare data were examined for number of patients and charges for all patients, and for those with nonspecific LBP. Total number of visits and charges for imaging studies, physical therapy (PT), and spinal injections was also examined for Pennsylvania. Study 2: 111 older adults with CLBP were interviewed regarding presence of red flags necessitating imaging and history of having a lumbar MRI, neurogenic claudication (NC), and back surgery. Results., Study 1: Between 1991 and 2002, there was a 42.5% increase in total Medicare patients, 131.7% increase in LBP patients, 310% increase in total charges, and 387.2% increase in LBP charges. In Pennsylvania (2000,2002), there was a 5.5% increase in LBP patients and 33.2% increase in charges (0.2% for PT, 59.4% for injections, 41.9% for MRI/CT, and 19.3% for X rays). Study 2: None of the 111 participants had red flags and 61% had undergone MRIs (29% with NC, 24% with failed back surgery syndrome). Conclusion., LBP documentation and diagnostic studies are increasing in Medicare beneficiaries, and evidence suggests that MRIs may often be ordered unnecessarily. Injection procedures appear to account for a significant proportion of LBP-associated costs. More studies are needed to examine the appropriateness with which imaging procedures and non-invasive/minimally invasive treatments are utilized, and their effect on patient outcomes. [source] Validation of diagnostic codes for outpatient-originating sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmia in Medicaid and Medicare claims data,PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 6 2010Sean Hennessy PharmD Abstract Purpose Sudden cardiac death (SD) and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) caused by medications have arisen as an important public health concern in recent years. The validity of diagnostic codes in identifying SD/VA events originating in the ambulatory setting is not well known. This study examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of hospitalization and emergency department encounter diagnoses in identifying SD/VA events originating in the outpatient setting. Methods We selected random samples of hospitalizations and emergency department claims with principal or first-listed discharge diagnosis codes indicative of SD/VA in individuals contributing at least 6 months of baseline time within 1999,2002 Medicaid and Medicare data from five large states. We then obtained and reviewed medical records corresponding to these events to serve as the reference standard. Results We identified 5239 inpatient and 29,135 emergency department events, randomly selected 100 of each, and obtained 119 medical records, 116 of which were for the requested courses of care. The PPVs for an outpatient-originating SD/VA precipitating hospitalization or emergency department treatment were 85.3% (95% confidence interval [CI],=,77.6,91.2) overall, 79.7% (95%CI,=,68.3,88.4) for hospitalization claims, and 93.6% (95%CI,=,82.5,98.7) for emergency department claims. Conclusions First-listed SD/VA diagnostic codes identified in inpatient or emergency department encounters had very good agreement with clinical diagnoses and functioned well to identify outpatient-originating events. Researchers using such codes can be confident of the PPV when conducting studies of SD/VA originating in the outpatient setting. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Social Inequality: Utilisation of general practitioner services by socio-economic disadvantage and geographic remotenessAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Issue 2 2004Gavin Turrell Objective: To examine the association between socio-economic status (SES) and GP utilisation across Statistical Local Areas (SLAs) that differed in their geographic remoteness, and to assess whether Indigenous status and GP availability modified the association. Design: Retrospective analysis of Medicare data for all unreferred GP consultations (1996/97) for 952 SLAs comprising the six Australian States. Geographic remoteness was ascertained using the Area Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA), and SES was measured by grouping SLAs into tertiles based on their Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage score. Main outcome measure: Age/sex standardised rates of GP utilisation for each SLA. Main results: In SLAs classified as ,highly accessible', rates of GP use were 10.8% higher (95% CI 5.7,16.0) in the most socio-economically disadvantaged tertile after adjustment for Indigenous status and GP availability. A very different pattern of GP utilsation was found in ,remote/very remote' SLAs. After adjustment, rates of GP use in the most socio-economically disadvantaged tertile were 25.3% lower (95% CI 5.9,40.7) than in the most advantaged tertile. Conclusions: People in socio-economically disadvantaged metropolitan SLAs have higher rates of GP utilisation, as would be expected due to their poorer health. This is not true for people living in disadvantaged remote/very remote SLAs: in these areas, those most in need of GP services are least likely to receive them. Australia may lay claim to having a primary health care system that provides universal coverage, but we are still some way from having a system that is economically and geographically accessible to all. [source] Social disadvantage: Its impact on the use of Medicare services related to diabetes in NSWAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Issue 3 2002Jane Overland Objective: To use Medicare data to examine the impact of social disadvantage on the use of health services related to diabetes. Method: Information on number of diabetic individuals and number of services for select Medicare item codes were retrieved by New South Wales postcodes using a Health Insurance Commission data file. The postcodes were graded into quintiles of social disadvantage. Results: People at most social disadvantage were significantly less likely to be under the care of a general practitioner (adjusted OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.40,0.41) or consultant physician (adjusted OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.48,0.53), despite this group having the highest prevalence of diabetes. The difference in attendance to other specialists was less marked but nevertheless significant (adjusted OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.68,0.75). Once under a doctor's care, patients at most disadvantage were slightly more likely to undergo HbA1c or microalbuminuria estimation (adjusted OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00,1.10 and adjusted OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.12,1.33, respectively) but were less likely to undergo lipid or HDL cholesterol estimation (adjusted OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.48,0.53 and adjusted OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79,0.90, respectively). Conclusion: While access to medical care is decreased for people at most social disadvantage, once under a doctor's care they receive a level of monitoring that is relatively equal to that provided to people less disadvantaged. Implication: Strategies are required to ensure equal access to medical services for all persons with diabetes, especially for persons who are at most social and medical disadvantage. [source] |