Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Mean Creatinine (mean + creatinine)
Selected AbstractsA comparison of sirolimus vs. calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapies in liver transplantationALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, Issue 4 2006H. ZAGHLA Summary Background, Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppressive agent whose role in liver transplantation has not been well-described. Aim, To evaluate the efficacy and side-effects of sirolimus-based immunosuppression in liver transplant patients. Methods, Retrospective analysis of 185 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients were divided into three groups: group SA, sirolimus alone (n = 28); group SC, sirolimus with calcineurin inhibitors (n =56) and group CNI, calcineurin inhibitors without sirolimus (n = 101). Results, One-year patient and graft survival rates were 86.5% and 82.1% in group SA, 94.6% and 92.9% in group SC, and 83.2% and 75.2% in group CNI (P = N.S.). The rates of acute cellular rejection at 12 months were comparable among the three groups. At the time of transplantation, serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in group SA, but mean creatinine among the three groups at 1 month was similar. More patients in group SA required dialysis before orthotopic liver transplantation (group SA, 25%; group SC, 9%; group CNI, 5%; P = 0.008), but at 1 year, post-orthotopic liver transplantation dialysis rates were similar. Conclusions, Sirolimus given alone or in conjunction with calcineurin inhibitors appears to be an effective primary immunosuppressant regimen for orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Further studies to evaluate the efficacy and side-effect profile of sirolimus in liver transplant patients are warranted. [source] Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation from Donors with Acute Renal Failure due to RhabdomyolysisAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009K. L. Mekeel With the current shortage of solid organs for transplant, the transplant community continues to look for ways to increase the number of organ donors, including extending the criteria for donation. In rhabdomyolysis, the byproducts of skeletal muscle breakdown leak into the circulation resulting in acute renal failure in up to 30% of patients. In nonbrain dead patients, this condition is reversible and most patients recover full renal function. Seven potential donors had rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure as evidenced by the presence of urine hemoglobin, plasma creatinine kinase levels of greater than five times the normal and elevated creatinine. One donor required dialysis. At our institution, 10 kidneys were transplanted from the seven donors. Two grafts had immediate function, five grafts experienced slow graft function and three grafts had delayed graft function requiring hemodialysis. At a mean of 8.7 months posttransplant (2.4,25.2 months), all patients have good graft function, are off dialysis and have a mean creatinine of 1.3 (0.7,1.8). In conclusion, our experience suggests that rhabdomyolysis with acute renal failure should not be a contraindication for donation, although recipients may experience slow or delayed graft function. [source] Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression in Renal Allograft Recipients with Thrombotic Microangiopathy/Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2006O. Øyen Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) represent serious threats to kidney allograft recipients. During a 4-year period, among 850 kidney transplantations, seven recipients with primary HUS and seven recipients (eight transplants) with previous or de novo TMA/HUS were identified and given calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression by sirolimus (SRL), mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Thirteen out of 15 transplantations were successful in the long term; resulting in a mean creatinine of 101 ,mol/L (16.4 months follow-up). In patients maintained on CNI-free regimen, no TMA/HUS recurrences were observed. A high rate of acute rejections (53%) may indicate insufficient immunosuppressive power and/or a causative relationship between TMA/HUS and rejection. Wound-related complications were abundant (60%), and call for surgical/immunosuppressive countermeasures. Our experience supports the idea that CNI's are major offenders in TMA/HUS induction. Total CNI elimination seems essential, as the nephrotoxic combination CNI + SRL may promote TMA. Features of TMA/HUS should be carefully explored in recurrent 'high responders'. [source] Alemtuzumab Induction and Sirolimus Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil Maintenance for CNI and Steroid-Free Kidney Transplant ImmunosuppressionAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2005S. M. Flechner We performed a pilot study in which 22 kidney recipients (14 LD: 8 DCD) were given alemtuzumab induction (30 mg day 0 and 1), steroids (500 mg mp day 0 and 1, none thereafter), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) maintenance (500 mg b.i.d) and sirolimus (concentration controlled 8,12 ng/mL). With a mean follow-up of 15.9 months, patient survival is (21/22) 96% and graft survival (19/22) 87%. Acute rejections occurred in (8) 36.3% (two humoral). Of 19 surviving grafts, 18 (95%) remain steroid and 15 (79%) CNI-free. At 1 year, mean creatinine was 1.43 mg/dL. Overall infection rates were low, but 2 patients developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at month 3 and 7, respectively, resulting in mortality in one and a graft loss in the other. No cancer or PTLD was observed. Leukopenia was common and MMF dose was reduced or eliminated in 6/22 (27%) patients. The reported higher than expected rate of acute rejection, leukopenia and possible pulmonary toxicity suggests excessive morbidity. Modifications such as an initial period of CNI use should be considered. [source] | ||||||||||