Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Methodologic Issues (methodologic + issues)
Selected AbstractsMethodologic issues in the assessment of the efficacy of radiation synovectomy for arthritis of the knee: Comment on the article by Janangier et alARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 1 2007Willm Uwe Kampen MD No abstract is available for this article. [source] Seizure Outcome after Temporal Lobectomy: Current Research Practice and FindingsEPILEPSIA, Issue 10 2001A. M. McIntosh Summary: ,Purpose: The literature regarding seizure outcome and prognostic factors for outcome after temporal lobectomy is often contradictory. This is problematic, as these data are the basis on which surgical decisions and counseling are founded. We sought to clarify inconsistencies in the literature by critically examining the methods and findings of recent research. Methods: A systematic review of the 126 articles concerning temporal lobectomy outcome published from 1991 was conducted. Results: Major methodologic issues in the literature were heterogeneous definitions of seizure outcome, a predominance of cross-sectional analyses (83% of studies), and relatively short follow-up in many studies. The range of seizure freedom was wide (33,93%; median, 70%); there was a tendency for better outcome in more recent studies. Of 63 factors analyzed, good outcome appeared to be associated with several factors including preoperative hippocampal sclerosis, anterior temporal localization of interictal epileptiform activity, absence of preoperative generalized seizures, and absence of seizures in the first postoperative week. A number of factors had no association with outcome (e.g., age at onset, preoperative seizure frequency, and extent of lateral resection). Conclusions: Apparently conflicting results in the literature may be explained by the methodologic issues identified here (e.g., sample size, selection criteria and method of analysis). To obtain a better understanding of patterns of long-term outcome, increased emphasis on longitudinal analytic methods is required. The systematic review of possible risk factors for seizure recurrence provides a basis for planning further research. [source] Genome-wide association studies of cardiovascular risk factors: design, conduct and interpretationJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 2009J. C. BIS Summary., Relying on known biology, candidate-gene studies have been only modestly successful in identifying genetic variants associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Genome-wide association (GWA) studies, in contrast, allow broad scans across millions of loci in search of unsuspected genetic associations with phenotypes. The large numbers of statistical tests in GWA studies and the large sample sizes required to detect modest-sized associations have served as a powerful incentive for the development of large collaborative efforts such as the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium [1]. This article uses published data on three phenotypes, fibrinogen, uric acid, and electrocardiographic QT interval duration, from the CHARGE Consortium to describe several methodologic issues in the design, conduct, and interpretation of GWA studies, including the use of imputation and the need for additional genotyping. Even with large studies, novel genetic loci explain only a small proportion of the variance of cardiovascular phenotypes. [source] Epidemiology: Theory, study design, and planning for educationTHE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, Issue 3 2000PhD Assistant Professor, Shelley A. Harris MSc Abstract Many health professionals have received formal training in epidemiology; however, much of it has been limited to introductory courses at the undergraduate level. Further, continuing education for health professionals has focused historically on substantive rather than methodologic issues in epidemiology. A methodologic focus is recommended to improve continuing education for the health of the public. It is crucial to equip educators and health professionals with the necessary tools or resources to understand study design, conduct research, analyze and interpret data, and critically evaluate published research. Thus, in this article, a general overview of epidemiologic study design and some of the most common methodologic issues are presented. Issues such as confounding, effect modification, measurement error, and power and sample size are highlighted. A broader recognition of these issues by educators and health professionals may ultimately help to improve public health by facilitating effective educational interventions, proper study design, analysis, interpretation, and application of epidemiologic research. [source] | ||||||||||