Home  About us  Contact
 

Membrane Elevation (membrane + elevation)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Kinds of Membrane Elevation

  • sinus membrane elevation
    		•

    Selected Abstracts

    Bone Reformation and Implant Integration following Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation: An Experimental Study in Primates

    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2006
    Vinicius C Palma DDS
    ABSTRACT Background:, Recent clinical studies have described maxillary sinus floor augmentation by simply elevating the maxillary sinus membrane without the use of adjunctive grafting materials. Purpose:, This experimental study aimed at comparing the histologic outcomes of sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of implants with and without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts. The purpose was also to investigate the role played by the implant surface in osseointegration under such circumstances. Materials and Methods:, Four tufted capuchin primates had all upper premolars and the first molar extracted bilaterally. Four months later, the animals underwent maxillary sinus membrane elevation surgery using a replaceable bone window technique. The schneiderian membrane was kept elevated by insertion of two implants (turned and oxidized, Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) in both sinuses. The right sinus was left with no additional treatment, whereas the left sinus was filled with autogenous bone graft. Implant stability was assessed through resonance frequency analysis (OsstellTM, Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) at installation and at sacrifice. The pattern of bone formation in the experimental sites and related to the different implant surfaces was investigated using fluorochromes. The animals were sacrificed 6 months after the maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure for histology and histomorphometry (bone-implant contact, bone area in threads, and bone area in rectangle). Results:, The results showed no differences between membrane-elevated and grafted sites regarding implant stability, bone-implant contacts, and bone area within and outside implant threads. The oxidized implants exhibited improved integration compared with turned ones as higher values of bone-implant contact and bone area within threads were observed. Conclusions:, The amount of augmented bone tissue in the maxillary sinus after sinus membrane elevation with or without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts does not differ after 6 months of healing. New bone is frequently deposited in contact with the schneiderian membrane in coagulum-alone sites, indicating the osteoinductive potential of the membrane. Oxidized implants show a stronger bone tissue response than turned implants in sinus floor augmentation procedures. [source]

    The influence of interfering septa on the incidence of Schneiderian membrane perforations during maxillary sinus elevation surgery: a retrospective study of 52 consecutive lateral window procedures

    ORAL SURGERY, Issue 1 2009
    S. Malkinson
    Abstract Aim:, Sinus lifts are a predictable method of augmenting the height of bone in maxillary posterior sextants. These procedures can be complicated by anatomical factors, such as the presence of interfering bony septa in the sinus. The objectives of this study were to investigate the incidence of interfering septa in patients undergoing sinus lifts and to see if the presence of interfering septa increased the chance of intra-operative membrane perforation. Materials and methods:, This retrospective cohort study assessed presence of interfering antral septa and their effect on Schneiderian membrane elevation in 45 patients with pneumatised sinuses undergoing sinus lifts. Chart audits and radiographic assessments were performed for 52 surgeries. The sinus lift procedure followed established guidelines. Presence of septa and occurrence of perforations were noted, and when perforations occurred, they were repaired with resorbable membranes. Results:, Septa were present in 40% of cases, and were found to be ,interfering' septa in 28.8% of cases. Membrane perforation occurred in 11.5% of cases. There was no statistically significant association between the presence of interfering septa and membrane perforation. Conclusion:, With enough experience and appropriate armamentarium and technique, an operator can overcome the presence of an interfering antral septum during a sinus lift procedure such that it does not increase the chance of perforating the Schneiderian membrane during elevation. [source]

    Sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous insertion of dental implants: a new surgical technique in maxillary sinus floor augmentation

    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, Issue 1 2008
    Stefan Lundgren
    First page of article [source]

    Bone Reformation and Implant Integration following Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation: An Experimental Study in Primates

    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, Issue 1 2006
    Vinicius C Palma DDS
    ABSTRACT Background:, Recent clinical studies have described maxillary sinus floor augmentation by simply elevating the maxillary sinus membrane without the use of adjunctive grafting materials. Purpose:, This experimental study aimed at comparing the histologic outcomes of sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous placement of implants with and without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts. The purpose was also to investigate the role played by the implant surface in osseointegration under such circumstances. Materials and Methods:, Four tufted capuchin primates had all upper premolars and the first molar extracted bilaterally. Four months later, the animals underwent maxillary sinus membrane elevation surgery using a replaceable bone window technique. The schneiderian membrane was kept elevated by insertion of two implants (turned and oxidized, Brånemark System®, Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) in both sinuses. The right sinus was left with no additional treatment, whereas the left sinus was filled with autogenous bone graft. Implant stability was assessed through resonance frequency analysis (OsstellTM, Integration Diagnostics AB, Göteborg, Sweden) at installation and at sacrifice. The pattern of bone formation in the experimental sites and related to the different implant surfaces was investigated using fluorochromes. The animals were sacrificed 6 months after the maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure for histology and histomorphometry (bone-implant contact, bone area in threads, and bone area in rectangle). Results:, The results showed no differences between membrane-elevated and grafted sites regarding implant stability, bone-implant contacts, and bone area within and outside implant threads. The oxidized implants exhibited improved integration compared with turned ones as higher values of bone-implant contact and bone area within threads were observed. Conclusions:, The amount of augmented bone tissue in the maxillary sinus after sinus membrane elevation with or without adjunctive autogenous bone grafts does not differ after 6 months of healing. New bone is frequently deposited in contact with the schneiderian membrane in coagulum-alone sites, indicating the osteoinductive potential of the membrane. Oxidized implants show a stronger bone tissue response than turned implants in sinus floor augmentation procedures. [source]

    The use of autologous venous blood for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in conjunction with sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2010
    Ha-Rang Kim
    Abstract Background: There have been reports of successful bone formation with sinus floor elevation induced by simply elevating the maxillary sinus membrane and filling the sinus cavity with a blood clot. Purpose: We investigated the feasibility of maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the patient's own venous blood in conjunction with a sinus membrane elevation procedure. Materials and methods: An implant that protruded 8 mm into the maxillary sinus after sinus membrane elevation was placed in the maxillary sinus of six adult female mongrel dogs. The resulting space between the membrane and the sinus floor was filled with autologous venous blood retrieved from each dog. The implants were left in place for 6 months. Results: During the experimental period, the created space collapsed and the sinus membrane fell down onto the implant. A small amount of new bone formation occurred in the space created by the collapsed membrane. The average height of newly formed bone around the implants in the sinus was 2.7±0.7 mm on the buccal side and 0.6±0.3 mm on the palatal side. Conclusion: The results of this pilot study indicate that blood clots do not have sufficient integrity to enable the sinus membrane to remain in an elevated position for therapeutically effective periods of time. Accordingly, it is recommended that this method be used only when a small aount of new bone formation is necessary around implants in the maxillary sinus cavity. To cite this article: Kim H-R, Choi B-H, Xuan F, Jeong S-M. The use of autologous venous blood for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in conjunction with sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 346,349. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01855.x [source]

    Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure

    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 5 2008
    A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments
    Abstract Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate in a randomized-controlled clinical trial the performance of rotary instruments compared with a piezoelectric device during maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and methods: Thirteen patients who required a bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation for implant,prosthetic rehabilitation were included in this study. A within-patient control study was carried out. The osteotomy for sinus access was performed on one side of the maxilla using the piezosurgery (test sites) and on the other side using conventional rotary diamond burs (control sites). The parameters recorded were as follows: bony window length (L), bony window height (H), bone thickness (T) and osteotomy area (A) , calculated by multiplying L and H. In addition, the time necessary for the osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation as well as the number of surgical complications were calculated. Results: The mean length and height of the bone window were similar in both groups. The osteotomy area (A) obtained by multiplying L and H was wider in the control group (151.2 ± 20.4 mm2) compared with the test group (137 ± 24.2 mm2). The time necessary for the osteotomy and the sinus membrane elevation with conventional instruments was 10.2 ± 2.4 min, while with the piezoelectric device it was 11.5 ± 3.8 min. Moreover, membrane perforation occurred in 30% of the maxillary sinuses in the test group and in 23% of the control group. None of the differences observed between the two groups reached a level of significance. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present study, it may be concluded that piezosurgery and conventional instruments did not show any differences in the clinical parameters investigated for the maxillary sinus floor elevation. [source]