Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Maxillary Denture (maxillary + denture)
Selected AbstractsInfluence of the thickness of the resin palatal vault on the closest speaking space with complete denturesJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 10 2001G. Schierano The closest speaking space (CSS) has been considered stable over time, and therefore useful to determine the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) in edentulous patients. Clemençon affirms that, in complete denture wearers, CSS is not constant but depends on the thickness of the resin palatal vault, and that is the air volume needed to pronounce words to remain constant. The aim of this study was to evaluate Clemençon hypothesis in a group of edentulous patients rehabilitated with traditional maxillary denture and mandibular implant anchored overdenture. The CSS was determined by means of a kinematics method using the Elite System® at 30, 60, 90, 180, 360 days from delivery. The CSS was assessed twice at each stage: with the unmodified denture and a second time after thickening the resin palatal vault by 2 mm with a calibrated wax layer. The CSS after thickening the resin palatal vault was wider. The wider CSS observed can be because of oro-sensory feedback excited by contact between tongue and palatal vault. As hypothesized by Clemençon thickening the resin palatal vault could be a useful procedure to increase the VDO, in cases in which it is too low from the aesthetic stand point. [source] Clinical evaluation of resilient denture liners.JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, Issue 3 2003Part 2: candida count, speciation Purpose The purpose of this study was to count and to speciate Candida isolated from 2 resilient denture liners, Molloplast-B and MPDS-SL. Materials and Methods A group of 20 patients each had 1 maxillary denture and 2 mandibular dentures fabricated. One mandibular denture was lined with Molloplast-B, and 1 was lined with MPDS-SL. Each denture was used for 3 months. At the end of the 3-month period, the mandibular denture was surrendered, and a 5 × 5-mm circular resilient liner sample was obtained from the tissue surface of the lingual flange. Samples were processed, and Candida was isolated and counted. Speciation of Candida was performed using CHROMagar Candida and API 20C AUX strips. Results Molloplast-B had, on average, 5 times as many CFU/sample as MPDSL-SL, but this difference was not significant (p= 0.26). A sign test gave a similar nonsignificant trend (p= 0.057). CHROMagar identified several Candida species, and confirmation was made using API 20C AUX strips. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of 19 Molloplast-B samples, 7 had no growth, 4 grew C. albicans, 3 grew C. parapsilosis, 2 grew C. glabrata, 1 grew C. tropicalis, 2 grew a Trichosporon spp., and 2 grew a nonidentifiable colony. The analogous counts for 19 MPDS-SL samples were 10, 4, 1, 3, 0, 1, and 1 (p= 0.45 for culture positively, exact McNemar test). ConclusionsCandida growth on Molloplast-B was not significantly different from growth on MPDS-SL. Several yeast species were cultured from each material. The rates of culture-positive testing did not differ between the 2 resilient denture liners. [source] Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preferenceGERODONTOLOGY, Issue 1 2009Shahrokh Esfandiari Background:, Studies show that elders wearing implant overdentures have improved nutrition and quality of life. However, upfront costs of this therapy are high, and the income of elderly edentulous populations is low. Objectives:, This study was designed (i) to measure the preferences of edentulous patients for mandibular two-implant overdentures using Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) and Willingness-To-Accept (WTA), (ii) to assess the effect of long-term financing on WTP and (iii) to assess the desired role of health care plans in financing dental prostheses. Methods:, Edentulous elders (68,79 years; n = 36) wearing maxillary dentures and either a mandibular conventional denture (CD, n = 13) or a two-implant overdenture with ball attachments (IOD, n = 23) participated in this study. All had received their prostheses 2 years previously, as part of a randomised clinical trial. A three-part questionnaire was completed during a 20-min interview with a trained researcher. Results:, Forty-six per cent (6/13) of the CD wearers and 70% (16/23) of the IOD wearers were willing to pay three times more than the current cost of conventional dentures for implant prostheses. These percentages were increased to 77% (CD) and 96% (IOD) if participants could pay for implant overdentures in monthly instalments. Eighty-six per cent (31/36) of all participants in both groups (21/23 IOD; 10/13 CD) thought that the government should cover at least some of the cost of implant overdentures. Conclusions:, This study shows that, the majority of elderly edentate individuals who have not experienced mandibular two-implant overdenture therapy are willing to pay the cost, particularly when payment can be made in monthly instalments. [source] Clinical quality of removable dentures provided by dentists, denturists and laboratory techniciansJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, Issue 4 2003R. Tuominen summary, The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical quality of removable dentures of elderly Finnish men, which had been prepared either by dentists, denturists or dental laboratory technicians. The participants comprised 242 denture-wearing subjects, with 231 maxillary and 177 mandibular removable dentures which had been prepared either by dentists, denturists or dental laboratory technicians. Clinical examinations were carried out without the examining dentist knowing who had provided the dentures. Complete dentures which had been illegally provided by laboratory technicians had significantly poorer retention and fitted less well in tuber and alveolar areas than those provided by either dentists or denturists. Complete maxillary dentures which had been provided illegally by laboratory technicians had significantly (P < 0·01) higher occurrence (90%) of some unacceptable characteristics than those (43%) provided by dentists or denturists. The difference between complete mandibular dentures was also obvious, 86% versus 59%, although statistically non-significant. Of those partial maxillary dentures provided by dentists 53% had some unacceptable characteristics, compared with 80% of those illegally provided by denturists or laboratory technicians (NS). In the case of partial mandibular dentures, 36% of those provided by dentists and 32% of those by denturists or laboratory technicians had some unacceptable characteristic (NS). Illegal provision of removable dentures seemed to be related to decreased clinical quality. [source] | ||||||||||