			Home About us Contact

M-protein Reduction (m-protein + reduction)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Efficacy of single-agent bortezomib vs. single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic comparison

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, Issue 2 2007
H. Miles Prince
Abstract Objective:, To conduct a systematic review of the efficacy of single-agent bortezomib vs. single-agent thalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple. Methods:, Publications in English from 1966 to June 2005 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library), publication reference lists, Janssen-Cilag data-on-file and abstracts from recent multiple myeloma conferences were reviewed. Prospective studies containing at least a single arm of either treatment group with n,30 were included. Studies adding dexamethasone for non-responders were excluded. Statistical pooling was performed for response rate and overallsurvival. Results:, One bortezomib study (n = 333, NEJM 2005, 352; 2487,98) and 15 thalidomide (n = 1007) studies met these criteria and were included. Patient baseline characteristics including age, gender, IgG : IgA, disease duration and beta-2 microglobulin were well matched except that 48% of bortezomib patients had received prior thalidomide. Response rate, defined as serum M-protein reduction ,50%, was 53% for patients receiving bortezomib vs. 32% for thalidomide (P < 0.001, n = 10 studies). Response rate determined by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria was 41% for patients receiving bortezomib vs. 22% for thalidomide (P < 0.001, n = 4 studies). Conclusion:, Bortezomib was associated with a significantly higher response rate and complete remission rate using both M-protein and EBMT criteria. [source]

Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination for patients with multiple myeloma following an initial response to bortezomib,

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, Issue 10 2009
Raman Sood
This clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of bortezomib retreatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who had previously responded to bortezomib. Patients with progressive MM who had previously tolerated bortezomib as a single agent or in combination with other drugs, with a minimum of partial response (PR; ,50% M-protein reduction) for ,4 months, who had not received intervening MM therapy, were retreated with bortezomib (days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle) with a starting dose being the dose at which the patient ended the initial treatment. Patients were allowed to receive bortezomib on retreatment in combination with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or doxorubicin. Thirty-two patients received bortezomib retreatment (most with added dexamethasone). The median treatment-free interval (last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of retreatment) was 9.9 (range 2.5,34.0) months. The median duration of retreatment was 2.8 (<1,7.9) months; median total duration of bortezomib treatment was 6.7 (2.5,19.8) months. Based on the investigators' assessment of best response, the overall response rate (complete plus PR) was 50%. The median time from start of retreatment to progressive disease (PD) was 6.6 (95% confidence interval: 5.1,9.6) months. Thirteen patients (41%) experienced PN; bortezomib-related SAEs were reported in four patients. Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with MM who have responded to their initial bortezomib treatment. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]

Residual serum monoclonal protein predicts progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma

CANCER, Issue 3 2010
Eric W. Schaefer MS
Abstract BACKGROUND: Currently used treatment response criteria in multiple myeloma (MM) are based in part on serum monoclonal protein (M-protein) measurements. A drawback of these criteria is that response is determined solely by the best level of M-protein reduction, without considering the serial trend. The authors hypothesized that metrics incorporating the serial trend of M-protein would be better predictors of progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with measurable disease at baseline (M-protein ,1 g/dL) who received ,4 cycles of treatment from 2 clinical trials in previously untreated MM were included. Three metrics based on the percentage of M-protein remaining relative to baseline (residual M-protein) were considered: metrics based on the number of times residual M-protein fell within prespecified thresholds, metrics based on area under the residual M-protein curve, and metrics based on the average residual M-protein reduction between Cycles 1 and 4. The predictive value of these metrics was assessed in Cox models using landmark analysis. RESULTS: The average residual M-protein reduction was found to be significantly predictive of PFS (P = .02; hazard ratio, 0.37), in which a patient with a 10% lower average residual M-protein reduction from Cycle 1 to 4 was estimated to be at least 2.7× more likely to develop disease progression or die early. None of the other metrics was predictive of PFS. The concordance index for the average residual M-protein reduction was 0.63, compared with 0.56 for best response. CONCLUSIONS: The average residual M-protein reduction metric is promising and needs further validation. This exploratory analysis is the first step in the search for treatment-based trend metrics predictive of outcomes in MM. Cancer 2010. © 2009 American Cancer Society. [source]