Home  About us  Contact
 

mPer2 Gene (mper2 + gene)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Life Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

PRECLINICAL STUDY: Circadian regulation of central ethanol sensitivity by the mPer2 gene

ADDICTION BIOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Stéphanie Perreau-Lenz
ABSTRACT The effect of alcohol is known to vary with the time of the day. Although initially it was suggested that this phenomenon may be due to diurnal differences in ethanol metabolism, more recent studies were contradicting. In the present study, we therefore first set out in assessing the diurnal variations in ethanol sensitivity in mice analysing, concurrently, ethanol elimination rates. Ethanol-induced (3.5 g/kg; intraperitoneal) loss of righting reflex (LORR) duration was thus determined at several Zeitgeber time (ZT) points (ZT5, 11, 17 and 23) in C57BL/6N mice. In parallel, the corresponding ethanol elimination rates were also assessed. The results display the existence of a distinct diurnal rhythm in LORR duration peaking at ZT11, whereas no differences could be observed regarding the elimination rates of alcohol. Successively, we checked the involvement of the clock genes mPer1 and mPer2 in conveying this rhythm in sensitivity, testing LORR and hypothermia at the peak and trough previously observed (ZT5 and ZT11). Per1Brdm1 mice demonstrate a similar diurnal pattern as control mice, with enhanced LORR durations at ZT11. In contrast, Per2Brdm1 mice did not exhibit a temporal variation to the depressant effects of ethanol with respect to LORR, revealing a constant high sensitivity to ethanol. The present study reveals a central role of the mPer2 gene in inhibiting alcohol sensitivity at the beginning of the inactive phase. [source]

Resetting the brain clock: time course and localization of mPER1 and mPER2 protein expression in suprachiasmatic nuclei during phase shifts

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 4 2004
Lily Yan
Abstract The mechanism whereby brief light pulses reset the mammalian circadian clock involves acute Per gene induction. In a previous study we investigated light-induced expression of mPer1 and mPer2 mRNA in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), with the aim of understanding the relationship between gene expression and behavioural phase shifts. In the present study, we examine the protein products of mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the core and shell region of SCN for 34 h following a phase-shifting light pulse, in order to further explore the molecular mechanism of photic entrainment. The results indicate that, during the delay zone of the phase response curve, while endogenous levels of mPER1 and mPER2 protein are falling, a light pulse produces an increase in the expression of both proteins. In contrast, during the advance zone of the phase response curve, while levels of endogenous mPER1 and mPER2 proteins are rising, a light pulse results in a further increase in mPER1 but not mPER2 protein. The regional distribution of mPER1 and mPER2 protein in the SCN follows the same pattern as their respective mRNAs, with mPER1 expression in the shell region of SCN correlated with phase advances and mPER2 in the shell region correlated with phase delays. [source]

Homeostatic sleep regulation is preserved in mPer1 and mPer2 mutant mice

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, Issue 6 2002
Caroline Kopp
Abstract A limited set of genes, Clock, Bmal1, mPer1, mPer2, mCry1 and mCry2, has been shown to be essential for the generation of circadian rhythms in mammals. It has been recently suggested that circadian genes might be involved in sleep regulation. We investigated the role of mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the homeostatic regulation of sleep by comparing sleep of mice lacking mPER1 (mPer1 mutants) or a functional mPER2 (mPer2 mutants), and wild-type controls (WT) after 6 h of sleep deprivation (SD). Our main result showed that after SD, all mice displayed the typical increase of slow-wave activity (SWA; EEG power density between 0.75 and 4 Hz) in nonREM sleep, reflecting the homeostatic response to SD. This increase was more prominent over the frontal cortex as compared to the occipital cortex. The genotypes did not differ in the effect of SD on the occipital EEG, while the effect on the frontal EEG was initially diminished in both mPer mutants. Differences between the genotypes were seen in the 24-h distribution of sleep, reflecting especially the phase advance of motor activity onset observed in mPer2 mutants. While the daily distribution of sleep was modulated by mPer1 and mPer2 genes, sleep homeostasis reflected by the SWA increase after 6-h SD was preserved in the mPer mutants. The results provide further evidence for the independence of the circadian and the homeostatic components underlying sleep regulation. [source]