Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
MPA Exposure (mpa + exposure)
Selected AbstractsValidation of limited sampling strategy for the estimation of mycophenolic acid exposure in Chinese adult liver transplant recipientsLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2007Chen Hao Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is indicated as immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation. The abbreviated models for the estimation of mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) have been established by limited sampling strategies (LSSs) in adult liver transplant recipients. In the current study, the performance of the abbreviated models to predict MPA exposure was validated in an independent group of patients. A total of 30 MPA pharmacokinetic profiles from 30 liver transplant recipients receiving MMF in combination with tacrolimus were used to compare 8 models' performance with a full 10 time-point MPA-AUC. Linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare the estimated MPA-AUC0-12h from each model against the measured MPA-AUC0-12h. A wide range of agreement was shown when estimated MPA-AUC0-12h was compared with measured MPA-AUC0-12h, and the range of coefficient of determination (r2) was from 0.479 to 0.936. The model based on MPA pharmacokinetic parameters C1h, C2h, C6h, and C8h had the best ability to predict measured MPA-AUC0-12h, with the best coefficient of determination (r2 = 0.936), the excellent prediction bias (2.18%), the best prediction precision (5.11%), and the best prediction variation (2SD = ±7.88 mg · h/L). However, the model based on MPA pharmacokinetic sampling time points C1h, C2h, and C4h was more suitable when concerned with clinical convenience, which had shorter sampling interval, an excellent coefficient of determination (r2 = 0.795), an excellent prediction bias (3.48%), an acceptable prediction precision (14.37%), and a good prediction variation (2SD = ±13.23 mg · h/L). Measured MPA-AUC0-12h could be best predicted by using MPA pharmacokinetic parameters C1h, C2h, C6h, and C8h. The model based on MPA pharmacokinetic parameters C1h, C2h, and C4h was more feasible in clinical application. Liver Transpl 13:1684,1693, 2007. © 2007 AASLD. [source] Mycophenolate Blood Level Monitoring: Recent ProgressAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009T. Van Gelder The concentration,effect relationship for mycophenolic acid (MPA), and the high variability in MPA concentrations in patients on standard dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy, for some centers has provided enough evidence to implement therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for MMF in daily practice. Two randomized trials Adaption de Posologie du MMF en Greffe Renale (APOMYGRE) and fixed-dose versus concentration controlled (FDCC) investigated the added benefit of TDM for MMF in renal transplant recipients. The APOMYGRE study showed a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection in concentration-controlled patients, while the FDCC study had a negative outcome, despite a similar study design. Although it was expected that these prospective trials would give the final answer to the question of whether or not TDM for MMF would be of benefit, it seems that the studies have not had much impact on patient management. Several trials have shown the importance of early adequate exposure to MPA in the first week after transplantation. As it will be hard to improve MPA exposure with TDM, this early, ongoing study now investigates the use of an increased starting dose. The increased starting dose will avoid underexposure to MPA in higher proportions of patients shortly after transplantation but may result in more toxicity in patients with MPA exposures exceeding the upper threshold of the therapeutic window. [source] Fixed- or Controlled-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil with Standard- or Reduced-Dose Calcineurin Inhibitors: The Opticept TrialAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009R. S. Gaston Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was developed with cyclosporine as a fixed-dose immunosuppressant. More recent data indicate a relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in individuals and clinical endpoints of rejection and toxicity. This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMFCC) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients. Patients received either (A) MMFCC and reduced-level calcineurin inhibitor (MMFCC/CNIRL); (B) MMFCC and standard-level CNI (MMFCC/CNISL); or (C) fixed-dose MMF and CNISL (MMFFD/CNISL). Antibody induction and steroid use were according to center practice. The primary endpoint was noninferiority (,= 0.05) of group A versus group C for treatment failure (including biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss and death) at 1 year. Although mean CNI trough levels in group A did not reach the prespecified targets, they were statistically lower than those in groups B and C (p , 0.01 for each comparison). BPAR rates (8.5%) were low across groups. Group A had 19% fewer treatment failures (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.18). MMF doses were highest (p < 0.05), with withdrawals for adverse events the fewest (p = 0.02), in group A. Of the 80% of subjects taking tacrolimus (Tac), those with higher MPA exposure had significantly less rejection (p < 0.001) and diarrhea correlated with Tac, but not with MPA levels. Thus, MMFCC with low-dose CNI resulted in outcomes not inferior to those with standard CNI exposure and MMFFD, indicating potential utility of MMFCC in CNI-sparing regimens. [source] Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Maintenance Renal Transplant PatientsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 4 2007K. Budde The aim of this single-center crossover substudy was to assess pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics [inosine 5,-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity] of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at steady-state conditions. Stable maintenance renal transplant patients on 1 g MMF b.i.d. participating in a double-blind, multicenter study, were randomized to receive EC-MPS (720 mg b.i.d.) or continue receiving MMF (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 12 months. Thereafter, all patients (n = 18) received 720 mg EC-MPS b.i.d. Area under the plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration,time curve with EC-MPS (57.4 ± 15.0 ,g h/mL) fulfilled bioequivalence criteria (geometric mean 0.98 (90% CI: 0.87,1.11) compared to MMF (58.4 ± 14.1 ,g h/mL). Consistent with the delayed release characteristics of EC-MPS, peak MPA concentration (geometric mean 0.89; 90% CI: 0.70,1.13) occurred approximately 0.5 h later (p < 0.05) and predose MPA levels (geometric mean 2.10; 90% CI: 1.51,2.91) were higher and more variable, not fulfilling bioequivalence criteria. IMPDH activity inversely followed MPA concentrations and was inhibited to a similar degree (approximately 85%) by both formulations. The calculated value for 50% IMPDH inhibition was identical for both drugs. In conclusion, equimolar doses of EC-MPS and MMF produce equivalent MPA exposure, while the delayed release formulation of EC-MPS exhibits more variable predose levels and Tmax. Overall, IMPDH activity reflected MPA pharmacokinetics. [source] Influence of Co-Medication with Sirolimus or Cyclosporine on Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Kidney TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2005D. Cattaneo The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA),the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF),is significantly influenced by co-medications. The impact of sirolimus on daily MPA exposure, however, has not been investigated so far. As a part of the study aimed at investigating the efficacy of Campath-1H induction therapy in a steroid-free regimen in kidney transplantation, MPA plasma levels were serially measured in 21 patients treated with low-dose sirolimus (SRL) or low-dose CsA both in addition to low-dose MMF over 12 months post-operatively. Full pharmacokinetic profiles were compared at month 6 and 12 post-surgery. Mean dose-adjusted MPA trough levels were 4.4-fold higher in patients on combined SRL and MMF than in those given CsA and MMF. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that mean MPA Cmax and Tmax were comparable in the two groups, while mean MPA AUC0-12 was higher in SRL than CsA treated patients. The pharmacokinetic profile of SRL- but not of CsA-group showed a second peak consistent with the enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. These findings suggest that SRL and CsA have different effects on MPA metabolism and/or excretion eventually affecting its immunosuppressive property and/or toxicity. CsA, but not SRL, inhibits MPA enterohepatic recirculation, reducing MPA daily exposure. [source] Correlation of IMPDH1 Gene Polymorphisms with Subclinical Acute Rejection and Mycophenolic Acid Exposure Parameters on Day 28 after Renal TransplantationBASIC AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, Issue 2 2010Hideaki Kagaya The correlations with subclinical acute rejection, IMPDH1 polymorphisms and MPA exposure on day 28 post-transplantation were investigated in 82 Japanese recipients. Renal transplant recipients were given combination immunosuppressive therapy consisting of tacrolimus and 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 g/day of MMF in equally divided doses every 12 hr at designated times. There were no significant differences in the incidence of subclinical acute rejection between IMPDH1 rs2278293 or rs2278294 polymorphisms (p = 0.243 and 0.735, respectively). However, in the high MPA night-time exposure range (AUC >60 ,g·h/ml and C0 , 1.9 ,g/ml), there was a significant difference in the incidence of subclinical acute rejection between IMPDH1 rs2278293 A/A, A/G and G/G genotypes (each p = 0.019), but not the IMPDH1 rs2278294 genotype. In the higher daytime MPA exposure range, patients with the IMPDH1 rs2278293 G/G genotype also tended to develop subclinical acute rejection. In patients with the IMPDH rs2278293 A/A genotype, the risk of subclinical acute rejection episode tends to be low and the administration of MMF was effective. The risk of subclinical acute rejection for recipients who cannot adapt in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MPA seems to be influenced by IMPDH1 rs2278293 polymorphism. The prospective analysis of IMPDH1 rs2278293 polymorphism as well as monitoring of MPA plasma concentration after transplantation might help to improve MMF therapy. [source] Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in combination with sirolimus or ciclosporin in renal transplant patientsBRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Issue 6 2007Mark D. Pescovitz Aims To compare the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its metabolite (MPAG) when mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is administered in combination with sirolimus or ciclosporin (CsA) in renal allograft recipients. Safety and efficacy (biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR)) were also assessed. Methods Patients (n = 45) were randomized 2 : 1 to receive treatment with sirolimus (n = 30; dosed to maintain trough concentrations of 10,25 ng ml,1 until week 8, and then 8,15 ng ml,1 thereafter) or CsA (n = 15; administered as per centre practice) both in combination with daclizumab, oral MMF and corticosteroids. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed at day 7, week 4, and months 3 and 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was the AUC(0,12 h) for MPA and MPAG. The pharmacokinetics of sirolimus were also assessed. Results MPA exposure was 39,50% lower (month 6 mean AUC(0,12 h) (95%CI): 40.4 (33.8, 47.0) vs. 68.5 (54.9, 82.0) µg ml,1 h) and MPAG exposure was 25,52% higher (722 (607, 838) vs. 485 (402, 569) µg ml,1 h at month 6) in the presence of CsA compared with sirolimus across visits. BPAR was 40.0% with sirolimus and 13.3% with CsA. The incidence of hypertension, tremors and hirsutism was higher with CsA than with sirolimus, while the incidence of diarrhoea, hyperlipidaemia and impaired wound closure was higher with sirolimus. No deaths, malignancies or graft losses were reported. Conclusions Co-administration of sirolimus with MMF led to greater MPA exposure, but lower MPAG exposure, than co-administration with CsA. As rejection rates were higher in the absence of CsA, further study of calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens is required before general recommendations can be made. [source] Mycophenolate Blood Level Monitoring: Recent ProgressAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 7 2009T. Van Gelder The concentration,effect relationship for mycophenolic acid (MPA), and the high variability in MPA concentrations in patients on standard dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy, for some centers has provided enough evidence to implement therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for MMF in daily practice. Two randomized trials Adaption de Posologie du MMF en Greffe Renale (APOMYGRE) and fixed-dose versus concentration controlled (FDCC) investigated the added benefit of TDM for MMF in renal transplant recipients. The APOMYGRE study showed a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection in concentration-controlled patients, while the FDCC study had a negative outcome, despite a similar study design. Although it was expected that these prospective trials would give the final answer to the question of whether or not TDM for MMF would be of benefit, it seems that the studies have not had much impact on patient management. Several trials have shown the importance of early adequate exposure to MPA in the first week after transplantation. As it will be hard to improve MPA exposure with TDM, this early, ongoing study now investigates the use of an increased starting dose. The increased starting dose will avoid underexposure to MPA in higher proportions of patients shortly after transplantation but may result in more toxicity in patients with MPA exposures exceeding the upper threshold of the therapeutic window. [source] | ||||||||||||||||||||||