			Home About us Contact

Lower Body Negative Pressure (lower + body_negative_pressure)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	62%

Selected Abstracts

Cardiovascular Response to Graded Lower Body Negative Pressure in Young and Elderly Man

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 3 2001
R. van Hoeyweghen
Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) reduces central venous pressure (CVP) and cardiac output. The elderly are reported to have a limited capacity to increase cardiac output by increasing heart rate (HR), are especially dependent on end diastolic volume to maintain stroke volume and therefore should be especially vulnerable to LBNP. The present study compared the effects of LBNP in the young and old. Stroke volume was assessed non-invasively as stroke distance (SD) by aortovelography. Two groups of healthy male volunteers were studied: eight young (29.7 ± 2.0 years, mean ± S.E.M.) and nine old (70.1 ± 0.9 years). LBNP was applied progressively at 17.5, 35 and 50 mmHg in 20 min steps, with measurements taken during each steady state. There were similar, significant, falls in CVP in both groups. SD fell significantly in both groups from respective control values of 24.8 ± 1.6 and 16.6 ± 0.9 cm to 12.5 ± 1.3 and 8.9 ± 0.4 cm at a LBNP of 50 mmHg. Although SD in the elderly was significantly lower than in the young, the LBNP-induced changes were not different between groups. Both groups produced similar significant increases in vascular resistance, HR, plasma vasopressin (AVP) and noradrenaline. Mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) and plasma adrenaline did not change significantly. Therefore healthy old men respond to LBNP in a similar manner to the young, although MBP and SD are regulated around different baselines in the two groups. [source]

Paradoxical Vasodilation During Lower Body Negative Pressure in Patients with Vasodepressor Carotid Sinus Syndrome

JOURNAL OF AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, Issue 6 2003
Arduino A. Mangoni MD
OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the pathophysiological mechanism of the vasodepressor form (VD) of carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) by maneuvers designed to induce generalized sympathetic activation after baroreceptor unloading (lower body negative pressure, LBNP) or direct peripheral adrenoreceptor stimulation via local administration of norepinephrine (NA). DESIGN: Subjects were identified with VD of CSS through diagnostic testing. SETTING: Research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven young controls (YC) (mean age ± standard error of mean = 22.8 ± 0.7), eight elderly controls (EC) (72.6 ± 0.6), and eight elderly patients with VD (78.7 ± 1.7). MEASUREMENTS: Forearm arterial blood flow (FABF) was measured in the left and right arms by venous occlusion plethysmography. Measurements were performed during baseline conditions, LBNP (,20 mmHg), and intra-arterial NA infusion in the left brachial artery at three progressively increasing rates (60, 120, and 240 pmol/min). RESULTS: During LBNP, FABF significantly decreased in YC (baseline 3.61 ± 0.30 vs ,20 mmHg 2.96 ± 0.24 mL/100 g/min, P = .030) and EC (4.05 ± 0.74 vs 3.69 ± 0.65 mL/100 g/min, P = .033) but increased in elderly patients with VD (3.65 ± 0.60 vs 4.54 ± 0.80 mL/100 g/min, P = .020). During NA infusion, a significant forearm vasoconstriction occurred in YC (FABF left:right ratio 1.00 ± 0.05 at baseline; 0.81 ± 0.08 at 60 pmol/min, P = .034; 0.81 ± 0.05 at 120 pmol/min, P < .001; 0.72 ± 0.04 at 240 pmol/min, P < .001), whereas no significant FABF changes were observed in EC (1.04 ± 0.06; 0.96 ± 0.07, P = .655; 0.89 ± 0.10, P = .401; 0.94 ± 0.10, P = .590) or elderly patients with VD (1.04 ± 0.06; 1.16 ±0 .10, P = .117; 1.04 ± 0.08, P = .602; 1.11 ± 0.10, P = .305). CONCLUSION: VD of CSS is associated with a paradoxical vasodilatation during LBNP and an impairment of peripheral ,-adrenergic responsiveness, which may be age-related. [source]

Cardiovascular Response to Graded Lower Body Negative Pressure in Young and Elderly Man

Forearm vasoconstrictor response in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, Issue 10 2006
P. J. Van Gurp
Abstract Background, According to the ,haemodynamic hypothesis', increased tissue perfusion predisposes to microangiopathy in diabetic patients. We hypothesized that the typical haemodynamic changes underlying the increased tissue perfusion can be explained by a decreased sympathetic nerve activity caused by chronic hyperglycaemia. In this study we investigated sympathetic activity in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods, In 15 DM patients (DM duration 6·3 ± 3·8 year; HbA1c 7·9 ± 1·3%) and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (Control), sympathetic nervous system activity was measured at rest (baseline) and during sympathoneural stimulation (lower body negative pressure (LBNP)) by means of interstitial and plasma noradrenaline (NA) sampling and power spectral analysis. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured before (baseline) and during a cold pressure test. Forearm blood flow was measured during forearm vascular ,- and ,-adrenergic receptor blockade. Results, At baseline, forearm vascular resistance (FVR), plasma NA concentrations, MSNA and heart rate variability were similar in both groups. LBNP-induced vasoconstriction was significantly attenuated in the DM group compared with the Control group (,FVR: 12 ± 4 vs. 19 ± 3 arbitrary units, P < 0·05). The responses of plasma NA and heart rate variability did not differ. Conclusions,, Baseline FVR and sympathetic nerve activity are normal in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. However, the forearm vasoconstrictor response to sympathetic stimulation is attenuated, which cannot be attributed to an impaired sympathetic responsiveness. [source]

Modelflow estimates of cardiac output compared with Doppler ultrasound during acute changes in vascular resistance in women

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 4 2010
Kenneth S. Dyson
We compared Modelflow (MF) estimates of cardiac stroke volume (SV) from the finger pressure-pulse waveform (Finometer®) with pulsed Doppler ultrasound (DU) of the ascending aorta during acute changes in total peripheral resistance (TPR) in the supine and head-up-tilt (HUT) postures. Twenty-four women were tested during intravenous infusion of 0.005 or 0.01 ,g kg,1 min,1 isoprenaline, 10 or 50 ng kg,1 min,1 noradrenaline and 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerine. Responses to static hand-grip exercise (SHG), graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP, from ,20 to ,45 mmHg) and 45 deg HUT were evaluated on separate days. Bland,Altman analysis indicated that SVMF yielded lower estimates than SVDU during infusion of 0.01 ,g kg,1 min,1 isoprenaline (SVMF 92.7 ± 15.5 versus SVDU 104.3 ± 22.9 ml, P= 0.03) and SHG (SVMF 78.8 ± 12.0 versus SVDU 106.1 ± 28.5 ml, P < 0.01), while larger estimates were recorded with SVMF during ,45 mmHg LBNP (SVMF 52.6 ± 10.7 versus SVDU 46.2 ± 14.5 ml, P= 0.04) and HUT (SVMF 59.3 ± 13.6 versus SVDU 45.2 ± 11.3 ml, P < 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed a relationship (r2= 0.41, P < 0.01) between the change in TPR from baseline and the between-methods discrepancy in SV measurements. This relationship held up under all of the experimental protocols (regression for fixed effects, P= 0.46). These results revealed a discrepancy in MF estimates of SV, in comparison with those measured by DU, during acute changes in TPR. [source]

Paradoxical Vasodilation During Lower Body Negative Pressure in Patients with Vasodepressor Carotid Sinus Syndrome

Regulation of cerebral blood flow in patients with autonomic dysfunction and severe postural hypotension

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, Issue 4 2002
Birger Hesse
Background:,Whether cerebral blood flow (CBF) autoregulation is maintained in autonomic dysfunction has been debated for a long time, and the rather sparse data available are equivocal. The relationship between CBF and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was therefore tested in eight patients with symptoms and signs of severe cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction. Patients and methods:,Eight patients were included, three of whom had Parkinson's disease, three diabetes, one pure autonomic failure and the last one had multiple system atrophy. By the use of two techniques, the arteriovenous oxygen [(a-v)O2] method and xenon-inhalation with single photon emission tomography, 15 measurements (range 10,20) and three to four CBF measurements, respectively, were obtained in each patient. Following CBF measurements during baseline, MABP was raised gradually using intravenous noradrenaline infusion, and then lowered by application of lower body negative pressure. From the (a-v)O2 samples the CBF response to changes in MABP was evaluated using a computer program fitting one or two regression lines through the plot. Results and conclusion:,Preserved autoregulation was observed in three patients, while the remaining five patients showed a linear relationship between CBF and MABP. Comparison of the results of the tomographic CBF measurements to the (a-v)O2 data demonstrated that it is not possible to assess whether CBF is autoregulated or not with only three to four pairs of data. [source]

Effects of resistance training on cardiovascular responses to lower body negative pressure in the elderly

CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, Issue 5 2001
Lynn B. Panton
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether resistance training alters the cardiovascular responses to submaximal lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in the elderly. Twenty-one subjects were randomized into a control (C: n=10; 70 ± 3 years, mean ± SD) or a resistance training (TR: n=11; 67 ± 7 years) group. Subjects in the TR underwent 12 weeks of training consisting of three sets of 8,12 contractions at ,60,80% of their initial maximal one repetition, three times per week, on 10 different machines. Before (Pre) and after (Post) training, all subjects underwent exposures of LBNP of ,10, ,20 and ,40 Torr and muscle biopsy sampling at the vastus lateralis. TR increased (P,0·05) knee extension (Pre=379 ± 140 N, Post=534 ± 182 N) and chest press (Pre=349 ± 137 N, Post=480 ± 192 N) strength. Neither body weight nor percentage body fat were altered (P,>0·05) by training. Resistance training increased (P,0·05) cross-sectional area in both Type I (4203 ± 1196 to 5248 ± 1728 ,m2) and Type II (3375 ± 1027 to 4286 ± 1892 ,m2) muscle fibres. Forearm blood flow, forearm vascular conductance, mean arterial pressure, and heart-rate responses to LBNP were not altered by the training. These data suggest that the cardiovascular responses of elderly to LBNP are unaffected by 12 weeks of whole-body resistance training despite increases in muscle strength and size. [source]