Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Low Rectal Cancer (low + rectal_cancer)
Selected AbstractsAuthors' reply: The incidence of lateral pelvic side-wall nodal involvement in low rectal cancer may be similar in Japan and the West (Br J Surg 2008; 95: 33,49)BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 6 2008H. Yano No abstract is available for this article. [source] Primary rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal and vaginal defects after extended abdominoperineal resectionBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 4 2005S. W. Bell Background: Significant morbidity can result from perineal wounds, particularly after radiotherapy and extensive resection for cancer. Myocutaneous flaps have been used to improve healing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morbidity and results of primary rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the vagina and perineum after extended abdominoperineal resection. Methods: Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing one-stage rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction of extensive perineal wounds were studied prospectively. Twenty-six patients had surgery for recurrent or persistent epidermoid anal cancer or low rectal cancer, and 21 had high-dose preoperative radiotherapy. Results: Three weeks after the operation, complete healing of the perineal wound was seen in 27 of the 31 patients. There were nine flap-related complications including three patients with partial flap necrosis, two with vaginal stenosis, one with vaginal scarring, one with small flap disunion and two with weakness of the anterior abdominal wall. There were no unhealed wounds at the completion of follow-up (median 9 months). Conclusion: The transpelvic rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for the reconstruction of large perineal and vaginal wounds achieves wound healing with only moderate morbidity in the majority of patients after extensive abdominoperineal resection with or without radiotherapy. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resectionCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 1 2009M. Davies Abstract Objective, Local recurrence of rectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality following curative resection. The published rates vary after abdomino-perineal resection (APR) from 5% to 47%. The aim of this study was to evaluate local recurrence following curative APR for low rectal cancer in our unit. Method, The medical notes of patients treated between 1st January 1996 and 31st December 2000 were retrieved. Local recurrence was defined as the presence of tumour within the pelvis confirmed by clinical findings, pathological specimen or radiological reports. A curative resection was defined as excision of tumour in the absence of macroscopic metastatic disease and whose resection margins were greater than 1 mm circumferentially and 10 mm distally. Outcomes and survival were compared using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan,Meier method. Results, Two hundred consecutive cases with a diagnosis of rectal cancer were identified of which 139 underwent a curative resection (69.5%). Of these 40 patients (28%) underwent APR with curative intent. Two patients (5%) developed local recurrence at 18 and 24 months respectively. The overall local recurrence rate for all curative rectal cancer surgery, in the same period was 2.6%. Eleven patients have died in the follow-up period of which nine were cancer-related deaths. Conclusion, The local recurrence rates achieved with APR were not significantly different from those achieved with restorative operations. Tumours at the ano-rectal junction should not be dissected off the pelvic floor, but radically excised en bloc with the surrounding levator ani, as a cylinder, as originally described by Miles. [source] B001 Multicentre Randomized Trial of Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Ultra-Low Rectal CarcinomaCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2006E. Rullier Objective, This randomized study compared two neoadjuvant treatments in patients with a low rectal cancer less than 2 cm from the anal verge that would have required APR before radiotherapy. Method, A total of 207 patients (71% uT3) with a rectal carcinoma at 0.5 cm from the anal verge were randomized in two groups. The group HDR received a high dose of radiotherapy (45 Gy + boost 18 Gy). The group RCT received 45 Gy with concomitant chemotherapy (5FU). Surgery was performed 6 weeks after treatment, surgeons were trained with TME, APR and intersphincteric resection. Results, The rate of sphincter preserving surgery was 83% after HDR and 86% after RCT (P = 0.69). There was no difference in morbidity, clinical tumour regression (80% vs. 87%) and complete pathological response (8% vs. 15%) between HDR and RCT. Overall, the rate of R0 resection was 78%. After a follow-up of 23 months, the rates of local and distant recurrence were 6% and 19% respectively and the disease-free survival was 77%. Survival was better after sphincter preservation than after APR. Conclusion, Sphincter preservation was achieved in 85% of ultra-low rectal carcinomas without compromising oncological prinicples. No difference was observed between HDR and RCT. Further follow-up is necessary to confirm this conservative approach. [source] Complexities and controversies in the management of low rectal cancer: Proceedings of the 3rd Pelican Surgical Symposium 2005COLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 2006I. R. Daniels No abstract is available for this article. [source] | ||||||||||