Lobe Origin (lobe + origin)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Familial partial epilepsy with variable foci: A new family with suggestion of linkage to chromosome 22q12

EPILEPSIA, Issue 9 2010
José Morales-Corraliza
Summary Familial partial epilepsy with variable foci (FPEVF) is an autosomal dominant form of partial epilepsy characterized by the presence of epileptic seizures originating from different cerebral lobes in different members of the same family. Linkage to chromosomes 22q12 and 2q36 has been reported, although only six families have been published. We studied a new FPEVF family including nine affected individuals. The phenotype in this family was similar to that previously described and consisted of nocturnal and daytime seizures with semiology suggesting a frontal lobe origin. A video-EEG (electroencephalography) recording of the proband's seizures is presented and revealed hyperkinetic seizures of frontal lobe origin preceded by left frontal spikes. We excluded linkage to chromosome 2q36 and found a suggestion of linkage to chromosome 22q12 with a lod score of 2.64 (, = 0) for marker D22S689. [source]


Acute Postoperative Seizures after Frontal Lobe Cortical Resection for Intractable Partial Epilepsy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 6 2003
Simona Tigaran
Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and prognostic importance of acute postoperative seizures (APOSs) occurring in the first week after a focal corticectomy in patients with partial epilepsy of frontal lobe origin. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 65 patients who underwent a frontal lobe cortical resection for intractable partial epilepsy between April 1987 and December 2000. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year after surgery. Results: APOSs occurred in 17 (26%) patients. None of the following factors was shown to be significantly associated with the occurrence of APOSs: gender, duration of epilepsy, etiology for seizure disorder, use of subdural or depth electrodes, surgical pathology, or postoperative risk factor for seizures. Patients with APOSs were older at seizure onset and at the time of surgery (p = 0.003 and p = 0.05, respectively). At last follow-up, patients who had APOSs had a seizure-free outcome similar to that of individuals without APOSs (47.1% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.77). Patients with APOSs appeared less likely to have a favorable outcome [i.e., fewer than three seizures per year and >95% decrease in seizure activity (58.8 vs. 70.8%; p = 0.35)]. This result may not have reached statistical significance because of the sample size. No evidence suggested that precipitating factors or the timing of APOSs was an important prognostic factor. Conclusions: The presence of APOSs after frontal lobe surgery for intractable epilepsy does not preclude a significant reduction in seizure tendency. These findings may be useful in counseling patients who undergo surgical treatment for frontal lobe epilepsy. [source]


Serum S-100 Protein Is Not a Suitable Seizure Marker in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

EPILEPSIA, Issue 10 2002
Fritz Leutmezer
Summary: ,Purpose: S-100 protein is a sensitive marker of various brain diseases; however, its role in epilepsy is controversially discussed in the literature. We therefore studied the temporal profile of serial concentrations of S-100 protein in serum after secondarily generalized tonic,clonic seizures during video-EEG monitoring. Methods: Ten patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy were prospectively studied. Serum S-100 protein was measured after a seizure-free period of ,24 h (baseline) and 30 min, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after a secondarily generalized tonic,clonic seizure of temporal lobe origin in nine and a convulsive status epilepticus in one patient. Results: All S-100 levels were within the normal range, except for those of one patient at baseline. Mean values were 0.045 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.13 ,g/L) at baseline, 0.038 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.09 ,g/L) at 30 min, 0.036 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.08 ,g/L) at 3 h, 0.034 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.07 ,g/L) at 6 h, 0.034 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.08 ,g/L) at 12 h, and 0.035 ,g/L (range, 0.003,0.09 ,g/L) at 24 h after seizure offset. There were no significant differences between mean concentrations at any interval postictally. Conclusions: We could not detect any significant alterations in serum S-100 protein concentration either after a single secondarily generalized tonic,clonic seizure or after convulsive status epilepticus in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Our data do not confirm previous work, which suggested serum S-100 protein to be a suitable marker for epileptic seizures. [source]


Chronological progression of a language deficit appearing to be postictally reversible in a patient with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy

PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, Issue 2 2000
Tatsuya Kudo
Abstract A language deficit occurring interictally, with chronological progression, and postictally in a patient with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy, which began at 1.6 years of age, is reported. The patient was a 30-year-old right-handed man whose seizures seemed to originate from the left frontal lobe and to involve the left temporal lobe. The deficit in oral language consisted mainly of features of motor aphasia, including delayed initiation of speech with great effort, echolalic and palilalic tendencies, and word-finding difficulty, but he also showed features of sensory aphasia. Written language had agraphia observed in sensory aphasia, including well-formed letters, paraphasias, neologisms, and paragrammatism. Postictally, the language deficit appeared to be superficially reversible, and evolved from mutism through non-fluent jargon to the interictal level of language. Analysis of the patient's diaries from 10 to 26 years of age disclosed chronologically progressive deterioration of language with paragrammatism, showing an increase of grammatical errors, neologismus, literal and verbal paraphasias and misconstruction of sentences. The results suggest that localization-related epilepsy of presumably left frontal lobe origin causes not only a postictal language deficit but also a slowly progressive deficit of language function. [source]