Loading Histories (loading + history)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Multiaxial fatigue of rubber: Part I: equivalence criteria and theoretical aspects

FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, Issue 6 2005
W. V. MARS
ABSTRACT This paper investigates commonly used approaches for fatigue crack nucleation analysis in rubber, including maximum principal strain (or stretch), strain energy density and octahedral shear strain criteria. The ability of these traditional equivalence criteria, as well as a recent equivalence criterion (the cracking energy density) to predict multiaxial fatigue behaviour is explored. Theoretical considerations are also introduced relating to the applicability of various fatigue life analysis approaches. These include the scalar nature of traditional equivalence criteria, robustness of the criteria investigated for a wide range of multiaxial loadings, effects of crack closure and applications to non-proportional multiaxial loadings. It is shown that the notion of a stress or strain amplitude tensor used for the analysis of multiaxial loading in metals is not appropriate in the analysis of rubber due to nonlinearity associated with finite strains and near incompressibility. Taken together, these considerations illustrate that traditional criteria are not sufficiently consistent or complete to permit confident analysis of arbitrary multiaxial loading histories, and that an analysis approach specific to the failure plane is needed. Of the three traditional criteria, maximum principal strain is shown to match most closely to the cracking energy density criterion, in terms of a failure locus in principal stretch space. [source]


Analytical solutions for a three-invariant Cam clay model subjected to drained loading histories

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, Issue 5 2006
Dunja Peri
Abstract Analytical solutions are derived for a three-invariant Cam clay model subjected to proportional and circular drained loading histories. The solutions are presented for a specific volume, and volumetric and generalized shear strains. In the case of a proportional loading only straight effective stress paths are considered while in the case of a circular loading the maximum possible change in Lode's angle is ,/3 due to plastic isotropy. Additionally, a concept of deviatoric stiffness is devised and an analytical expression for the generalized hardening modulus is derived. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are carried out in the form of direct comparisons between analytical solutions for drained and undrained loading histories thus offering an improved understanding of the three-invariant model. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]


Effects of loading rate on viscoplastic properties of polymer geosynthetics and its constitutive modeling

POLYMER ENGINEERING & SCIENCE, Issue 3 2010
Fang-Le Peng
On the basis of the special tensile test results under various loading histories, the rate-dependent behaviors of three polymer geosynthetics due to their viscous properties have been investigated. All the investigated polymer geosynthetics show significant loading rate effects, creep deformation, and stress relaxation. Except for the polyester geogrid showing the combined viscosity, all the investigated polymer geosynthetics exhibit the isotach viscosity. An elasto-viscoplastic constitutive model described in a nonlinear three-component model framework is developed to simulate the rate-dependent behaviors of polymer geosynthetics. The developed constitutive model is verified by comparing its simulated results with the experimental data of polymer geosynthetics presented in this study and those available from the literature. The comparison indicates that the developed model can reasonably interpret the rate-dependent behaviors of polymer geosynthetics under arbitrary loading histories, including the step-changed strain rate loading, creep, and stress relaxation applied during otherwise monotonic loading (ML). POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers [source]