			Home About us Contact

Liver Transplant Centers (liver + transplant_center)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Liver transplantation for Wilson's disease: The burden of neurological and psychiatric disorders

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2005
Valentina Medici
A retrospective data analysis on liver transplantation for Wilson's disease (WD) was performed among Italian Liver Transplant Centers. Thirty-seven cases were identified. The main indication for liver transplantation was chronic advanced liver disease in 78% of patients. Mixed hepatic and neuropsychiatric symptoms were recorded in 32.3%. Eight patients presented with fulminant liver failure; 44.8% were on medical treatment. Patient and graft survival at 3 months, 12 months, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years after transplantation were, respectively, 91.8%, 89.1%, 82.9%, 75.6%, and 58.8%, and 85.3%, 83.0%, 77.1%, 70.3%, and 47.2%. Neurological symptoms significantly improved after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but the survival of patients with mixed hepatic and neuropsychiatric involvement was significantly lower than in patients with liver disease alone (P = 0.04). WD characterized by hepatic involvement alone is a rare but good indication for liver transplantation when specific medical therapy fails. Patients with neuropsychiatric signs have a significantly shorter survival even though liver transplantation has a positive impact on neurological symptoms. In conclusion, a combination of hepatic and neuropsychiatric conditions deserves careful neurological evaluation, which should contraindicate OLT in case of severe neurological impairment. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:1056,1063.) [source]

Transplant Center Volume and Outcomes After Liver Retransplantation

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009
P. P. Reese
Liver retransplantation surgery has a high rate of allograft failure due to patient comorbidities and technical demands of the procedure. Success of liver retransplantation could depend on surgeon experience and processes of care that relate to center volume. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult liver retransplantation procedures performed from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2005 using registry data from the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network. The primary outcome was 1-year allograft failure. Liver transplant centers were categorized as small, intermediate or high volume by dividing overall liver transplants into three tertiles of approximately equal size. Mean annual volume of overall liver transplants was <50 for low-volume centers, 50,88 for intermediate-volume centers and >88 for high-volume centers. The primary analysis consisted of 3977 liver retransplantation patients. The unadjusted risk of 1-year allograft failure was 37.8%. In multivariable logistic regression, the risk of 1-year allograft failure was not significantly different between low- (reference), intermediate- (OR 0.86, CI 0.72,1.03, p = 0.11) and high-volume centers (OR 0.88, CI 0.74,1.04, p = 0.14). Results were similar when the analysis was limited to retransplantation performed >160 days after initial transplantation. Center volume is an imprecise surrogate measure for 1-year outcomes after liver retransplantation. [source]

Liver transplantation for incidental cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of the Canadian experience

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2005
Peter Ghali
Cholangiocarcinoma is a biliary tumor, which not infrequently complicates primary sclerosing cholangitis. It carries a poor prognosis and, with the exception of carefully selected individuals in research protocols, contraindicates orthotopic liver transplantation. There has been some suggestion that cholangiocarcinomas incidentally discovered at the time of transplantation carry a better prognosis. The goal of this retrospective study was to perform a national review of outcomes after liver transplantation in Canadian recipients found to have incidental cholangiocarcinoma in their explanted native liver. Six of the seven liver transplant centers in Canada provided clinical and follow-up information on all liver transplant recipients found to have incidental cholangiocarcinoma in their explants. The diagnosis or suspicion of cholangiocarcinoma prior to transplantation were exclusion criteria for this study. Ten individuals with cholangiocarcinoma were transplanted between 1996 and 2003. The median duration of follow-up was 28 months. Eight of the 10 had PSC. All of the tumors were stage I or II. The 3-year survival for these patients was 30%. The median time to recurrence was 26 months (95% confidence interval 13uu-uu37), and the median time to death was 30 months (95% confidence interval 28uu-uu53). In conclusion, although early survival of patients transplanted for incidental cholangiocarcinoma appears good, intermediate- and long-term survival rates are not better than for individuals historically transplanted with known cholangiocarcinoma. Aggressive investigation for cholangiocarcinoma is mandated. Incidentally found tumours remain a difficult treatment problem, and prospective adjuvant chemo-, radio-, and immunotherapies should be investigated. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:1412,1416.) [source]

Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: The canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin a trial: 1-year follow-up

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2003
Paul Greig
Corticosteroid therapy contributes significant toxicity to liver transplantation. The safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal were determined in patients treated with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporin A (micro-CsA). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were steroid-free 1 year posttransplantation. From the seven Canadian adult liver transplant centers, 143 patients were randomly allocated oral treatment with either tacrolimus (n = 71) or micro-CsA (n = 72), together with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Eligibility criteria for steroid withdrawal included freedom from acute rejection for a minimum of 3 months, and prednisone ,0.15 mg/kg/d. In eligible patients, the daily steroid dose was reduced by 2.5 mg each month until complete discontinuation was achieved. At 1 year after transplantation, 75% of the tacrolimus patients and 63% of the micro-CsA patients were steroid-free (P = .20). Of all of the patients who became eligible for steroid withdrawal, steroid discontinuation was achieved in over 80%. One-year patient survival was 97% with tacrolimus and 89% with micro-CsA (P = .052). Graft survival was 97% and 86%, respectively (P = .017). The overall incidence of acute rejection during the first year was 35% with tacrolimus and 43% with micro-CsA (P = .26). There was no difference in survival, acute rejection, or rate of steroid withdrawal when adjusting for hepatitis C. All acute rejection episodes experienced during steroid withdrawal were steroid-responsive. Steroid-resistant rejection occurred in 5.6% of the tacrolimus and 9.7% of the micro-CsA patients. One patient, in the micro-CsA group, experienced refractory rejection. Chronic rejection was not observed in either group. The toxicity profiles were similar. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were similar, and dialysis was required in less than 10% of patients in each group. Infectious complications were similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was a serious adverse event in 13% and 10% of patients receiving tacrolimus and micro-CsA, respectively. Early steroid withdrawal is safe and effective after liver transplantation using either tacrolimus plus azathioprine or micro-CsA plus azathioprine immunoprophylaxis. [source]