Home About us Contact | |||
Antileukemic Activity (antileukemic + activity)
Selected AbstractsSynthesis and in vitro Antileukemic Activity of New 4-Triazenopyrazole Derivatives.CHEMINFORM, Issue 35 2004Giuseppe Daidone Abstract For Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text. [source] Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignanciesENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, Issue 6 2010Benigno C. Valdez Abstract Despite successful molecularly targeted, highly specific, therapies for hematologic malignancies, the DNA interstrand crosslinking agents, which are among the oldest and least specific cytotoxic drugs, still have an important role. This is particularly true in stem cell transplantation, where virtually every patient receives conditioning therapy with a DNA-alkylating agent-based program. However, due to concern about serious additive toxicities with combinations of different alkylating drugs, the last several years have seen nucleoside analogs, whose cytotoxic action follows vastly different molecular pathways, introduced in combination with alkylating agents. The mechanistic differences paired with different metabolic pathways for the respective drugs have clinically translated into increased safety without appreciable loss of antileukemic activity. In this report, we review pre-clinical evidence for synergistic antileukemic activity when nucleoside analog(s) and DNA-alkylating agent(s) are combined in the most appropriate manner(s), without a measurable decrease in clinical efficacy compared with the more established alkylating agent combinations. Data from our own laboratory using combinations of fludarabine, clofarabine, and busulfan as prototype representatives for these respective classes of cytotoxic agents are combined with information from other investigators to explain how the observed molecular events will result in greatly enhanced synergistic cytotoxicity. We further present possible mechanistic pathways for such desirable cytotoxic synergism. Finally, we propose how this information-backed hypothesis can be incorporated in the design of the next generation conditioning therapy programs in stem cell transplantation to optimize antileukemic efficacy while still safeguarding patient safety. Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Cooperative antitumor effects of vitamin D3 derivatives and rosemary preparations in a mouse model of myeloid leukemiaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, Issue 12 2006Hagar Sharabani Abstract 1,,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D3) is a powerful differentiation agent, which has potential for treatment of myeloid leukemias and other types of cancer, but the calcemia produced by pharmacologically active doses precludes the use of this agent in the clinic. We have shown that carnosic acid, the major rosemary polyphenol, enhances the differentiating and antiproliferative effects of low concentrations of 1,25D3 in human myeloid leukemia cell lines (HL60, U937). Here we translated these findings to in vivo conditions using a syngeneic mouse leukemia tumor model. To this end, we first demonstrated that as in HL60 cells, differentiation of WEHI-3B D, murine myelomonocytic leukemia cells induced by 1 nM 1,25D3 or its low-calcemic analog, 1,25-dihydroxy-16-ene-5,6-trans-cholecalciferol (Ro25-4020), can be synergistically potentiated by carnosic acid (10 ,M) or the carnosic acid-rich ethanolic extract of rosemary leaves. This effect was accompanied by cell cycle arrest in G0+G1 phase and a marked inhibition of cell growth. In the in vivo studies, i.p. injections of 2 ,g Ro25-4020 in Balb/c mice bearing WEHI-3B D, tumors produced a significant delay in tumor appearance and reduction in tumor size, without significant toxicity. Another analog, 1,25-dihydroxy-16,23Z-diene-20-epi-26,27-hexafluoro-19-nor-cholecalciferol (Ro26-3884) administered at the same dose was less effective than Ro25-4020 and profoundly toxic. Importantly, combined treatment with 1% dry rosemary extract (mixed with food) and 1 ,g Ro25-4020 resulted in a strong cooperative antitumor effect, without inducing hypercalcemia. These results indicate for the first time that a plant polyphenolic preparation and a vitamin D derivative can cooperate not only in inducing leukemia cell differentiation in vitro, but also in the antileukemic activity in vivo. These data may suggest novel protocols for chemoprevention or differentiation therapy of myeloid leukemia. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Imatinib compared with chemotherapy as front-line treatment of elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL),CANCER, Issue 10 2007Oliver G. Ottmann MD Abstract BACKGROUND Elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have a poor prognosis, with a low complete remission (CR) rate, high induction mortality, and short remission duration. Imatinib (IM) has a favorable toxicity profile but limited antileukemic activity in advanced Ph+ALL. Imatinib in combination with intensive chemotherapy has yielded promising results as front-line therapy, but its value as monotherapy in newly diagnosed Ph+ALL is not known. METHODS Patients with de novo Ph+ALL were randomly assigned to induction therapy with either imatinib (IndIM) or multiagent, age-adapted chemotherapy (Indchemo). Imatinib was subsequently coadministered with consolidation chemotherapy. RESULTS In all, 55 patients (median age, 68 years) were enrolled. The overall CR rate was 96.3% in patients randomly assigned to IndIM and 50% in patients allocated to Indchemo (P = .0001). Nine patients (34.6%) were refractory and 2 patients died during Indchemo; none failed imatinib induction. Severe adverse events were significantly more frequent during Indchemo (90% vs 39%; P = .005). The estimated overall survival (OS) of all patients was 42% ± 8% at 24 months, with no significant difference between the 2 cohorts. Median disease-free survival was significantly longer in the 43% of patients (21 of 49 evaluable) in whom BCR-ABL transcripts became undetectable (18.3 months vs 7.2 months; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS In elderly patients with de novo Ph+ALL, imatinib induction results in a significantly higher CR rate and lower toxicity than induction chemotherapy. With subsequent combined imatinib and chemotherapy consolidation, this initial benefit does not translate into improved survival compared with chemotherapy induction. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society. [source] |