Lesions Suspicious (lesion + suspicious)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Molecular Breast Imaging: Advantages and Limitations of a Scintimammographic Technique in Patients with Small Breast Tumors

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 1 2007
Michael K. O'Connor PhD
Abstract:, Preliminary studies from our laboratory showed that molecular breast imaging (MBI) can reliably detect tumors <2 cm in diameter. This study extends our work to a larger patient population and examines the technical factors that influence the ability of MBI to detect small breast tumors. Following injection of 740 MBq Tc-99m sestamibi, MBI was performed on 100 patients scheduled for biopsy of a lesion suspicious for malignancy that measured <2 cm on mammography or sonography. Using a small field of view gamma camera, patients were imaged in the standard mammographic views using light pain-free compression. Subjective discomfort, breast thickness, the amount of breast tissue in the detector field of view, and breast counts per unit area were measured and recorded. Follow-up was obtained in 99 patients; 53 patients had 67 malignant tumors confirmed at surgery. Of these, 57 of 67 were detected by MBI (sensitivity 85%). Sensitivity was 29%, 86%, and 97% for tumors <5, 6,10, and ,11 mm in diameter, respectively. In seven patients, MBI identified eight additional mammographically occult tumors. Of 47 patients with no evidence of cancer at biopsy or surgery, there were 36 true negative and 11 false positive scans on MBI. MBI has potential for the regular detection of malignant breast tumors less than 2 cm in diameter. Work in progress to optimize the imaging parameters and technique may further improve sensitivity and specificity. [source]


Review of 125 SiteSelect Stereotactic Large-Core Breast Biopsy Procedures

THE BREAST JOURNAL, Issue 3 2003
Christa C. Corn MD
Abstract: Advances in stereotactic breast biopsies have introduced a variety of devices that yield different sizes of tissue samples. The choice of biopsy device should be based on which technique is most likely to yield a definitive diagnosis at the time of the initial biopsy. This is a prospective study of 104 patients who underwent a total of 125 stereotactic breast biopsies using the SiteSelect large-core biopsy device. From May 1999 to June 2001, 104 patients underwent 125 stereotactic breast biopsies with the SiteSelect large-core biopsy device. One hundred four 15 mm SiteSelect biopsies, eighteen 10 mm SiteSelect biopsies, and three 22 mm SiteSelect biopsies were performed. Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were found in 15% of the biopsies and infiltrating cancer was found in another 15% of the biopsies. Seventy-eight percent of the ADH and 90% of the DCIS lesions were associated with indeterminate calcifications noted on mammogram. Two of the 22 mm SiteSelect excisions yielded a specimen that contained the entire cancer with clear surgical margins. All of the patients with DCIS or invasive carcinoma underwent definitive surgical and adjuvant therapy. The sensitivity and specificity of SiteSelect in this series of patients was 100%. The SiteSelect biopsy procedure is safe, well tolerated by patients, and can be performed under local anesthesia. SiteSelect is comparable to an open excisional biopsy in its ability to obtain adequate tissue for accurate diagnosis, but excises significantly less normal surrounding breast tissue. Based on the data, indications for primary use of SiteSelect are indeterminate calcifications on mammogram, rebiopsy of a vacuum-assisted biopsy site that yielded atypia on pathologic examination, and complete excision of a lesion suspicious for invasive carcinoma in order to assess actual size and margin status. [source]


Management of skin cancer in solid organ transplant recipients

DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, Issue 1 2005
Carmen Traywick
ABSTRACT:, The incidence of catastrophic skin cancer in the solid organ transplant population continues to rise. As transplant patients are living longer, it is likely that dermatologists will be looking after an increasing number of organ transplant recipients. The key to managing this patient population lies in a multidisciplinary approach encompassing patient education, skin screening in the immediate post-transplant period, regular follow-up, and rapid referral to a dermatologist once skin lesions suspicious for skin cancer are diagnosed. Of paramount importance is discussion with transplant physicians to negotiate reduction of immunosuppression in the setting of catastrophic skin cancer. This article defines the scope of the problem of skin cancer in the solid organ transplant population, defines the nature of the lesions commonly presented, and reinforces the benefit of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of these patients. [source]


WT1 Is Not a Reliable Marker to Distinguish Reactive from Neoplastic Astrocyte Populations in the Central Nervous System

BRAIN PATHOLOGY, Issue 6 2010
T. David Bourne MD
Abstract A diagnostic difficulty in neuropathology practice is distinguishing reactive from neoplastic astrocyte populations. This is particularly true in small biopsy samples that lack evidence of increased cellularity or mitotic activity, microvascular proliferation, or necrosis. We performed the current study to validate the previously reported finding that in the central nervous system, the expression of WT1 is limited to neoplastic astrocytes. We retrospectively studied WT1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 100 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain tissue samples consisting of 3 normal control tissues, 44 cases of reactive gliosis, 49 gliomas and 4 lesions suspicious for glioma. In normal human cortex, WT1 staining was restricted to vascular endothelium. Most cases of reactive gliosis (82%) showed at least focal WT1 positivity, and analysis of specimens with electrode monitoring lesions showed an inverse relationship between WT1 expression intensity and the number of days from electrode placement to tissue resection. All glioma samples (100%) and all cases suspicious for glioma (100%) showed at least focal WT1 positivity. Our results likely differ from those in the prior report because of differences in tissue fixation and IHC methodology. Thus, our findings indicate that WT1 expression alone is not a reliable feature to distinguish reactive from neoplastic astrocytes. [source]


An evaluation of the role of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in skin cancer diagnosis and management

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2005
R. Mahendran
Summary There is currently much interest in the potential role of telemedicine in improving the delivery of dermatological care in the UK. The two teledermatology systems available at present are divided into live video and store-and-forward technology. We investigated the value of a store-and-forward teledermatology system in the diagnosis and management of lesions suspicious of skin cancer. A total of 163 store-and-forward referrals of patients with one lesion each were assessed independently by a Consultant and a third-year trainee dermatologist. The accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of management from these assessments was compared to a subsequent face-to-face consultation with the Consultant. Analysis of the Consultants' diagnoses showed that 48% were identical for teledermatology and conventional face-to-face consultations. A further 17% of teledermatology diagnoses included the actual clinical diagnosis as a possibility but 20% were either incorrect or a diagnosis could not be made. In the remaining 15% of cases the digital image was of insufficient quality for assessment. Of the trainee's reports, 44% were identical to the clinical diagnoses and another 20% included the clinical diagnosis as a possibility. The management plan was appropriate in 55% of the total teledermatology referrals assessed by the Consultants and in 52% assessed by the trainee when compared with the conventional consultation. This study illustrates that the store-and forward type telemedicine system has limited diagnostic accuracy for skin lesions. However, our results suggest that store-and-forward teledermatology may be suitable and safe for screening out clearly benign lesions but the study casts doubt on its efficiency. [source]