Home About us Contact | |||
Laparoscopic Surgery (laparoscopic + surgery)
Kinds of Laparoscopic Surgery Selected AbstractsPEUTZ,JEGHERS POLYPOSIS WITH BLEEDING FROM POLYPS OF THE SIGMOID COLON SUCCESSFULLY TREATED BY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 1 2003Kazuhiro Yada We report a case of colonic bleeding complicating congestive heart failure in a patient with Peutz,Jeghers (P,J) polyposis successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. A 49-year-old woman was admitted for severe cough and edema of the extremities. Chest X-ray revealed bilateral pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. Her cardiac function was within normal limits, but anemia and severe hypoproteinemia were observed. During the treatment, anal bleeding was observed. Endoscopic and radiographic examinations revealed hundreds of polyps from the duodenum to the rectum. 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid human serum albumin scintigraphy showed radiotracer collected in the sigmoid colon, the area having the most polyps. After some intestinal polypoid lesions were resected endoscopically, laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid colectomy and cecectomy were performed. In the postoperative course, she complained less about abdominal pain and her first flatus occurred on the third postoperative day. She recovered uneventfully. The anemia, hypoproteinemia, and congestive heart failure resolved and gastrointestinal bleeding has not been seen. It was thought that protein loss and hemorrhage due to the P,J polyposis caused congestive heart failure. When congestive heart failure is accompanied by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, it is important to consider hypoproteinemia due to gastrointestinal polyposis, such as that characterizing P,J syndrome. Laparoscopic surgery was very useful for the treatment of colonic bleeding. [source] SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2009Abhay Rane No abstract is available for this article. [source] Laparoscopic Surgery of the AbdomenANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2005David I. Watson No abstract is available for this article. [source] PEUTZ,JEGHERS POLYPOSIS WITH BLEEDING FROM POLYPS OF THE SIGMOID COLON SUCCESSFULLY TREATED BY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 1 2003Kazuhiro Yada We report a case of colonic bleeding complicating congestive heart failure in a patient with Peutz,Jeghers (P,J) polyposis successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. A 49-year-old woman was admitted for severe cough and edema of the extremities. Chest X-ray revealed bilateral pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. Her cardiac function was within normal limits, but anemia and severe hypoproteinemia were observed. During the treatment, anal bleeding was observed. Endoscopic and radiographic examinations revealed hundreds of polyps from the duodenum to the rectum. 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid human serum albumin scintigraphy showed radiotracer collected in the sigmoid colon, the area having the most polyps. After some intestinal polypoid lesions were resected endoscopically, laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid colectomy and cecectomy were performed. In the postoperative course, she complained less about abdominal pain and her first flatus occurred on the third postoperative day. She recovered uneventfully. The anemia, hypoproteinemia, and congestive heart failure resolved and gastrointestinal bleeding has not been seen. It was thought that protein loss and hemorrhage due to the P,J polyposis caused congestive heart failure. When congestive heart failure is accompanied by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, it is important to consider hypoproteinemia due to gastrointestinal polyposis, such as that characterizing P,J syndrome. Laparoscopic surgery was very useful for the treatment of colonic bleeding. [source] Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease?,a conditional yesINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, Issue 1 2000Elizabeth M. Breen No abstract is available for this article. [source] How to use laparoscopic surgical instruments safelyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 3 2009Eiji Higashihara The development of laparoscopic surgery has been accompanied by a rapid increase in the number of laparoscopic surgical procedures carried out in the field of urology. In 2002 laparoscopic nephrectomy was approved for coverage under Japanese national health insurance, and in 2003 there were over 1000 registered cases in which this procedure was carried out. This suggests that laparoscopic nephrectomy, a procedure formerly conducted at only a few institutions, is now spreading to hospitals across Japan. Laparoscopic surgery involves the use of specialized instruments within a restricted field of vision, and risky surgical techniques can potentially result in visceral or vascular damage. In order to promote the use of safe laparoscopic surgery procedures, the Japanese Urological Association and the Japanese Society of Endourology and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) have inaugurated a certification program for urologic laparoscopy. This program not only encourages development in this field of surgery and provides technical certification to ensure appropriate levels of expertise, but also reviews methods for the correct use of instruments such as trocars and hemostats. The purpose of this video is to present correct methods for the use of a variety of laparoscopic instruments, in order to increase the safety of this procedure. The video has been designed to be useful not only for practitioners who are just beginning laparoscopy, but also for those who already have extensive laparoscopic experience. The video discusses five laparoscopic instruments (trocar, electric surgical devices, ultrasonic surgery devices, clips and clip appliers and endo-staplers), and demonstrates their correct use. In addition, animal models are used to illustrate the potential complications that can be associated with some methods of use. [source] The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with three or more comorbiditiesINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 1 2007Yukio Naya Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery for kidney treatment is a common procedure. However, the efficacy of this procedure in patients with several comorbidities has not been well investigated. We conducted a retrospective comparison of results of laparoscopic surgery between patients with several comorbidities and patients with no comorbidity to access the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Methods: The subjects were 20 patients with three or more comorbidities (group A) and 46 patients with less than three comorbidities (group B). These 66 patients were 48 men and 18 women with a mean age of 62.3 years (age range, 24,83 years). The data from these two groups were compared for American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score, previous surgical history, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, tumor size, complications during and after surgery, conversion rates, time to oral intake, and length of hospital stay. Results: The initial ASA score and age were significantly higher for the patients with comorbidities (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0008, respectively). All other variables before, during, and after surgery were similar for both laparoscopic groups. However, the incidence of atelectasis of laparoscopy was higher than that of open surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopic nephrectomy for patients with comorbidities is safe and minimally invasive. Further investigation to prevent atelectasis is necessary. [source] Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery for pheochromocytomaINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 2 2005YUKIO NAYA Abstract Objective: Laparoscopic surgery for primary aldosteronoma and Cushing's syndrome is well established. We report on our experiences with laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma, and assess the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approach. Methods: Between April 1998 and April 2003, a total of 23 patients underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma at Chiba University Hospital and Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Japan. We compared the surgical outcomes of these patients with those of 106 patients with adrenal tumors due to other pathologies who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy during the same period. Results: The mean tumor size of pheochromocytoma was 4.96 cm. Mean operative time was 192.7 min, and mean estimated blood loss was 130 mL. Neither mean operative time nor mean estimated blood loss was greater for patients with pheochromocytoma. Intraoperative hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg) occurred in 39.1% (9/23) of patients with pheochromocytoma. During the follow-up period, there were no mortalities or recurrences of endocrinopathy. Conclusions: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is a safe and minimally invasive procedure. [source] Laparoscopic surgery in neonates and infants weighing less than 5 kgPEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, Issue 6 2000Tadashi Iwanaka Background: Laparoscopic surgery in small infants is still an uncommon procedure in Japan. The present study was conducted to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery in neonates and infants weighing less than 5 kg. Methods: Between July 1997 and November 1999, 54 infants underwent laparoscopic surgery. They were evaluated for length of operation, intra- and postoperative complications, changes in intra-operative body temperature, time to postoperative feeding, length of hospital stay and changes in serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) and interleukin (IL)-6 on days 0, 1 and 4. These parameters in the laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) and laparoscopic fundoplication groups were compared with those in the open pyloromyotomy (OP) and open fundoplication groups, respectively, which were performed during the same period. Results: Three laparoscopy cases were converted to open procedures. One case of fundoplication had panperitonitis due to failed gastrostomy and required long-term parenteral nutrition. Time to postoperative feeding and length of hospital stay in the LP group were significantly shorter than in the OP group. In LP group, intra-operative body temperature did not markedly decrease during CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Although serum levels of CRP, CPK and IL-6 were elevated in all groups on postoperative day 1, there were no significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Better quality of life after laparoscopy is a significant advantage over conventional surgical procedures. This advantage not only outweighs the incidence of intra- and postoperative complications in small infants, but further emphasizes the need to improve laparoscopic techniques to avoid complications. [source] Impact of laparoscopic surgery on the long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancerANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 11 2009Jun-Gi Kim Abstract Background:, This 20-year retrospective study compared the results of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery for patients with rectal cancer to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on long-term oncological outcomes for rectal cancer. Methods:, We analysed survival data collected over 20 years for patients with rectal cancer (n= 407) according to surgical methods and tumour stage between those treated with laparoscopic surgery (n= 272) and those with open surgery (n= 135). Clinical factors were analysed to ascertain possible risk factors that might have been associated with survival from and recurrence of rectal cancer. A multivariate analysis was applied by using Cox's regression model to determine the impact of laparoscopic surgery on long-term oncological outcomes. Results:, Overall survival, disease-specific survival and disease-free survival rates were statistically higher in the laparoscopic group than in the open-surgery group. The incidence of local recurrence in the laparoscopic group (7.9%; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 4.2,11.5) was significantly lower than that for the open-surgery group (30.2%; 95% CI, 21.0,39.3; P < 0.001). By using a multivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer appeared not to be an independent factor for disease-specific survival or disease-free survival. However, the laparoscopic surgery was an independent factor associated with reduced local recurrence (Hazard ratio (HR), 3.408; 95% CI, 1.890,6.149; P < 0.001). Conclusion:, Laparoscopic surgery did not adversely affect the long-term oncological outcome for patients with rectal cancer. [source] GS28P LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR OBESE PATIENTSANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 2007S. W. Li Background Laparoscopic surgery is often perceived to be more difficult for obese patients. Middlemore Hospital has unique patient population with high prevalence of obesity. This is a pilot study to compare the outcome of obese and non-obese patients who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution. Our hypothesis is that obese patients do not suffer more adverse postoperative outcome. Methods We reviewed all patients undergoing acute and elective cholecystectomy from January 2004 to December 2006, 100 obese patients were identified. The control group consists of 100 non-obese patients matched for age, sex and type of admission. Outcome assessed includes length of recovery period, complication and conversion rate. Results Over the three year period there were 1400 cholecystectomies, of which 96% were commenced laparoscopically. Overall conversion rate was 3.8%. The obese group has increased rate of wound complication (10% vs 2%, p = 0.037) and conversion rate (8% vs 3.5%, p = 0.28). The two study groups have similar median length of postoperative stay of 4 days. Conclusion This confirms our hypothesis that it is safe for obese patients to have laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However there is increased risk of conversion and wound complication. [source] Single-port laparoscopic surgery, the new evolution of endoscopic surgeryASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, Issue 3 2009H. Rivas Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery through a single port is gaining great interest throughout the world. Our group has pioneered and been a leader on these novel techniques. Here we describe our experience based on a model of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: From January 2008 until August 2009, over 200 patients have undergone single-port laparoscopic surgery at our institution. Here, we analyze a cohort of the initial 100 cholecystectomies in order to evaluate a proposed technique, common challenges, the learning curve and potential solutions. Results: Single-port laparoscopic surgery was feasible in all patients from this cohort. Patients were strictly selected. Operating times similar to those of conventional laparoscopy were only achieved after completing 50 cases. Common technical challenges included clashing instruments, deflection of laparoscope due to conflict with light source, and organ retraction. Acceptance by surgeons and lack of patience and time may become significant obstacles that prevent the procedure's widespread adoption. The excellent aesthetic results are superior to laparoscopy. Other benefits of laparoscopy are preserved and may prove to be superior on clinical trials. Discussion: Single-port laparoscopic surgery is becoming popular worldwide. Safe and successful adoption requires learning the basic concepts of this method, identifying challenges, and implementing solutions. Once these essentials are mastered, the learning curve may be shortened, especially for experienced laparoscopic surgeons, and this technique may then be used to replicate many abdominal operations. Transparency with patients and team building are essential requirements for a successful adoption. Clinical trials are ideal before universal adoption. [source] Total laparoscopic hysterectomy as a primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer in morbidly obese womenBJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 1 2005C.K.H. Yu To evaluate the feasibility of total laparoscopic hysterectomy as the primary treatment for endometrial cancer in morbidly obese women, an audit was carried out during an 18-month period in a tertiary referral centre for gynaecological oncology. Four women who had laparoscopic surgery were compared with a similar cohort who had open surgery. The mean operating time was equivalent, without evidence of excess morbidity with the laparoscopic approach. However, inpatient stay was longer with open versus laparoscopic surgery (11.5 vs 4 days). Laparoscopic surgery is safe to use in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer. [source] Authors' reply: Laparoscopic surgery impairs tissue oxygen tension more than open surgery (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 362,368)BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 7 2007E. Fleischmann No abstract is available for this article. [source] Laparoscopic surgery impairs tissue oxygen tension more than open surgeryBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2007E. Fleischmann Background: Wound infection remains a common and serious complication after colonic surgery. Although many colonic operations are performed laparoscopically, it remains unclear whether this has any impact on the incidence of wound infection. Subcutaneous tissue oxygenation is an excellent predictor of surgical wound infection. The impact of open and laparoscopic colonic surgery on tissue oxygenation was compared. Methods: Fifty-two patients undergoing elective open and laparoscopic left-sided colonic resections were evaluated in a prospective observational study. Anaesthesia management was standardized and intraoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen was kept at 150 mmHg in both groups. Oxygen tension was measured in the subcutaneous tissue of the right upper arm. Results: At the start of surgery subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension (PsqO2) was similar in both groups (mean(s.d.) 65·8(17·2) and 63·7(23·6) mmHg for open and laparoscopic operations respectively; P = 0·714). Tissue oxygen remained stable in the open group, but dropped significantly in the laparoscopic group during the course of surgery (PsqO2 after operation 53·4(12·9) and 45·5(11·6) mmHg, respectively; P = 0·012). Conclusion: Laparoscopic colonic surgery significantly decreases PsqO2, an effect that occurs early in the course of surgery. As tissue oxygen tension is a predictor of wound infection, these results may explain why the risk of wound infection after laparoscopic surgery remains higher than expected. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgery,,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 2 2006N. Hiki Background: Laparoscopic surgery of the gastrointestinal tract involves a reduced immune response compared with open surgery. The aim of this study was to assess manual handling of the gut in open procedures as the principal cause of the enhanced immune response. Methods: Eighteen Landrace pigs underwent gastrectomy by three different methods: conventional open wound with bowel manipulation, laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy, and gastrectomy without manipulation using a combination of open wound and laparoscopic surgical devices. Local inflammatory changes were assessed by ascites formation, intestinal adhesion development and intestinal inflammatory gene expression. Associated systemic inflammatory changes were determined by measuring portal and systemic plasma endotoxin levels, plasma inflammatory cytokine levels, liver inflammatory gene expression and transaminase levels. Results: Significantly more postoperative intra-abdominal fluid and adhesions were seen in the open group. The expression of inflammatory cytokines was significantly greater in the intestine and liver in the open group. Portal and systemic levels of endotoxin, inflammatory cytokines and transaminases were also higher. Conclusion: Manual handling of organs during gastrectomy is an important contributor to the molecular and humoral inflammatory response to surgery, supporting the use of minimally invasive techniques in gastrointestinal surgery. Copyright © 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Role of hepatectomy in the management of bile duct injuriesBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 3 2001C. H. Wakefield Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with bile duct injuries of a more severe nature than open cholecystectomy. This study examined the emerging role of hepatectomy in the management of major iatrogenic bile duct injuries in the laparoscopic era. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients referred to a tertiary hepatobiliary unit with bile duct injuries over a 16-year period until April 2000. Data are expressed as median (range). Results: Eighty-eight patients (34 men, 54 women) were referred during this interval; their median age was 55 (19,83) years. Injuries resulted from 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomies and 35 open cholecystectomies, with three occurring during gastroduodenal procedures. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with injuries of greater severity than open cholecystectomy: Bismuth type I,II, 32 per cent versus 69 per cent for the open operation; type III,IV, 66 per cent versus 31 per cent for the open procedure (P = 0·02, ,2 test). After referral 73 patients underwent definitive surgical interventions: 57 hepaticojejunostomies, 11 revisions of hepaticojejunostomy, two orthotopic liver transplants and three right hepatectomies. Two patients had subsequent hepatectomy following initial hepaticojejunostomy. Four of the five hepatectomies were for the management of injuries perpetrated at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Criteria necessitating hepatectomy were liver atrophy on computed tomography (80 versus 11 per cent; P = 0·0001, ,2 test) and a greater incidence of angiographically proven vascular injury (40 versus 6 per cent; P = 0·006, ,2 test); in addition, type III,IV injuries were more frequent (60 versus 42 per cent) in the hepatectomy group. There were no procedure-related deaths. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 13 per cent. Median hospital stay was 10 days. Conclusion: Major hepatectomy allows the successful and safe repair of cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries complicated by concomitant vascular injury, unilateral lobar atrophy and destruction of the biliary confluence. © 2001 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Is laparoscopic surgery acceptable for advanced colon cancer?CANCER SCIENCE, Issue 4 2009Seigo Kitano Laparoscopic surgery is widespread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In Japan, a nationwide survey has shown that the rate of advanced colorectal cancer has increased gradually to 65% of total laparoscopic surgeries in 2007. Many randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that in the short term, laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, and has many benefits, including reduction of peri-operative mortality. In terms of long-term outcomes, four randomized controlled trials suggest that there are no differences in laparosupic and open surgery for colon cancer. However, important issues, including long-term oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, and the impact on the quality of life of patients, should be addressed in well-designed large-scale trials. In Japan, a retrospective multicenter study has demonstrated that the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery are beneficial, and the long-term outcomes are the same as for open surgery. In 2004, a prospective large-scale randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) to compare laparoscopic surgery with open surgery was started to evaluate oncological outcomes for advanced colon cancer. This trial is supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. In the present study, laparoscopic surgery is found to be acceptable for stage I disease of colon cancer, whereas it is controversial for stage II/III disease because of inadequate clinical evidence. Whether laparoscopic surgery is acceptable for advanced colon cancer or not should be confirmed by the Japanese large-scale prospective randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) in the near future. (Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 567,571) [source] Laparoscopic colonic resection in inflammatory bowel disease: minimal surgery, minimal access and minimal hospital stayCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2008E. Boyle Abstract Objective, Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is technically demanding but can offer improved short-term outcomes. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as the default operative approach for IBD, however, may have inherent learning curve-associated disadvantages. We hypothesise that the establishment of MIS as the standard operative approach does not increase patient morbidity as assessed in the initial period of its introduction into a specialised unit, and that it confers earlier postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and reduced hospitalisation compared with conventional open resection. Method, A case,control study was undertaken on laparoscopic resection (LR) vs open colon resection (OR) for IBD. The LR group was collated prospectively and compared with a pathologically matched historical control set. Outcomes measured included: postoperative length of stay, time to normal bowel function and postoperative morbidity. Statistical analysis was performed using spss. Results, Twenty-eight patients were investigated (14 LR, 14 OR). The two groups were matched for type of operation, type of disease and age. There were no conversions in the LR group. Morbidity and readmissions did not differ significantly between the groups. Those undergoing laparoscopic resection had a quicker return to diet (median 2 vs 4 days; P = 0.000002), time to first bowel motion (2 vs 4 days; P = 0.019) and shorter postoperative length of stay (5.5 vs 12.5; P = 0.0067). Conclusion, These findings support the routine use of MIS for the elective surgical management of IBD in our department. Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomies for IBD can expect faster return of gastrointestinal function and shorter hospitalisation. [source] Indications for laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease using the Vienna ClassificationCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2007K. Okabayashi Abstract Objective, The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease and clarify the indications using the Vienna Classification. Method, Between September 1994 and July 2004, 107 patients with Crohn's disease underwent 124 procedures. Of these, 91 laparoscopic procedures formed the basis of this study. The Vienna Classification, which consists of three subgroups , age at diagnosis (A1-2), location (L1-4) and behaviour (B1-3) , was applied to compare the conversion to open surgery and incidence of postoperative complications. Results, Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 12 (13.2%) patients. Major and minor postoperative complications occurred in five (5.5%) and 13 (19.8%) patients respectively. The conversion rate, major and total complications in the B3L3/4 subgroup were significantly greater than in the other subgroups. Multivariate analysis showed that B3L3/4 was the only predictive factor for all complications. However, the incidence of major and all complications in the B3L3/4 subgroup did not differ between the open and laparoscopic surgery groups. Conclusion, Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease is the procedure of choice for all uncomplicated cases (B2L1-4, B3L1/2). For patients in the complicated group (B3L3/4), laparoscopy is also feasible and justified; however, the surgeon must be aware of the propensity for higher rate of conversion. [source] Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological fieldINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 10 2007Tetsuro Matsumoto Abstract: For urologists, it is very important to master surgical indications and surgical techniques. On the other hand, the knowledge of the prevention of perioperative infections and the improvement of surgical techniques should always be considered. Although the prevention of perioperative infections in each surgical field is a very important issue, the evidence and the number of guidelines are limited. Among them, the preparation of guidelines has progressed, especially in gastrointestinal surgery. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections, which have been used worldwide. In urology, the original guidelines were different from those of general surgery, due to many endourological procedures and urine exposure in the surgical field. The Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group has thus framed these guidelines supported by The Japanese Urological Association. The guidelines consist of the following nine techniques: open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureterorenoscope and transurethral lithotripsy, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate biopsy, cystourethroscope, pediatric surgeries in the urological field, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and febrile neutropenia. These are the first guidelines for the prevention of perioperative infections in the urological field in Japan. Although most of these guidelines were made using reliable evidence, there are parts without enough evidence. Therefore, if new reliable data is reported, it will be necessary for these guidelines to be revised in the future. [source] Is laparoscopic surgery acceptable for advanced colon cancer?CANCER SCIENCE, Issue 4 2009Seigo Kitano Laparoscopic surgery is widespread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In Japan, a nationwide survey has shown that the rate of advanced colorectal cancer has increased gradually to 65% of total laparoscopic surgeries in 2007. Many randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that in the short term, laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, and has many benefits, including reduction of peri-operative mortality. In terms of long-term outcomes, four randomized controlled trials suggest that there are no differences in laparosupic and open surgery for colon cancer. However, important issues, including long-term oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, and the impact on the quality of life of patients, should be addressed in well-designed large-scale trials. In Japan, a retrospective multicenter study has demonstrated that the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery are beneficial, and the long-term outcomes are the same as for open surgery. In 2004, a prospective large-scale randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) to compare laparoscopic surgery with open surgery was started to evaluate oncological outcomes for advanced colon cancer. This trial is supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. In the present study, laparoscopic surgery is found to be acceptable for stage I disease of colon cancer, whereas it is controversial for stage II/III disease because of inadequate clinical evidence. Whether laparoscopic surgery is acceptable for advanced colon cancer or not should be confirmed by the Japanese large-scale prospective randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) in the near future. (Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 567,571) [source] MANAGEMENT OF THE BILE DUCT STONE: CURRENT SITUATION IN JAPANDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 2010Ichiro Yasuda Endoscopic treatment is now recognized as the standard treatment for common bile duct stones worldwide. Endoscopic treatment routinely involves endoscopic sphincterotomy in most countries including Japan and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation is also a widely used alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy in Japan. Surgery in any form, including laparoscopic surgery, is mainly performed when endoscopic treatments are unsuccessful or unfavorable. Other therapeutic modalities considered under certain circumstances include lithotripsy under the guidance of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy, peroral cholangioscopy, or enteroscopy; electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy; and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. [source] PEUTZ,JEGHERS POLYPOSIS WITH BLEEDING FROM POLYPS OF THE SIGMOID COLON SUCCESSFULLY TREATED BY LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERYDIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, Issue 1 2003Kazuhiro Yada We report a case of colonic bleeding complicating congestive heart failure in a patient with Peutz,Jeghers (P,J) polyposis successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. A 49-year-old woman was admitted for severe cough and edema of the extremities. Chest X-ray revealed bilateral pleural effusion and cardiomegaly. Her cardiac function was within normal limits, but anemia and severe hypoproteinemia were observed. During the treatment, anal bleeding was observed. Endoscopic and radiographic examinations revealed hundreds of polyps from the duodenum to the rectum. 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid human serum albumin scintigraphy showed radiotracer collected in the sigmoid colon, the area having the most polyps. After some intestinal polypoid lesions were resected endoscopically, laparoscopy-assisted sigmoid colectomy and cecectomy were performed. In the postoperative course, she complained less about abdominal pain and her first flatus occurred on the third postoperative day. She recovered uneventfully. The anemia, hypoproteinemia, and congestive heart failure resolved and gastrointestinal bleeding has not been seen. It was thought that protein loss and hemorrhage due to the P,J polyposis caused congestive heart failure. When congestive heart failure is accompanied by gastrointestinal hemorrhage, it is important to consider hypoproteinemia due to gastrointestinal polyposis, such as that characterizing P,J syndrome. Laparoscopic surgery was very useful for the treatment of colonic bleeding. [source] Cardiopulmonary, blood and peritoneal fluid alterations associated with abdominal insufflation of carbon dioxide in standing horsesEQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, Issue 3 2003F. G. LATIMER Summary Reasons for performing study: Abdominal insufflation is performed routinely during laparoscopy in horses to improve visualisation and facilitate instrument and visceral manipulations during surgery. It has been shown that high-pressure pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide (CO2) has deleterious cardiopulmonary effects in dorsally recumbent, mechanically ventilated, halothane-anaesthetised horses. There is no information on the effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiopulmonary function and haematology, plasma chemistry and peritoneal fluid (PF) variables in standing sedated horses during laparoscopic surgery. Objectives: To determine the effects of high pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum in standing sedated horses on cardiopulmonary function, blood gas, haematology, plasma chemistry and PF variables. Methods: Six healthy, mature horses were sedated with an i.v. bolus of detomidine (0.02 mg/kg bwt) and butorphanol (0.02 mg/kg bwt) and instrumented to determine the changes in cardiopulmonary function, haematology, serum chemistry and PF values during and after pneumoperitoneum with CO2 to 15 mmHg pressure for standing laparoscopy. Each horse was assigned at random to either a standing left flank exploratory laparoscopy (LFL) with CO2 pneumoperitoneum or sham procedure (SLFL) without insufflation, and instrumented for measurement of cardiopulmonary variables. Each horse underwent a second procedure in crossover fashion one month later so that all 6 horses had both an LFL and SLFL performed. Cardiopulmonary variables and blood gas analyses were obtained 5 mins after sedation and every 15 mins during 60 mins baseline (BL), insufflation (15 mmHg) and desufflation. Haematology, serum chemistry analysis and PF analysis were performed at BL, insufflation and desufflation, and 24 h after the conclusion of each procedure. Results: Significant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output and cardiac index and significant increases in mean right atrial pressure, systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance were recorded immediately after and during sedation in both groups of horses. Pneumoperitoneum with CO2 at 15 mmHg had no significant effect on cardiopulmonary function during surgery. There were no significant differences in blood gas, haematology or plasma chemistry values within or between groups at any time interval during the study. There was a significant increase in the PF total nucleated cell count 24 h following LFL compared to baseline values for LFL or SLFL at 24 h. There were no differences in PF protein concentrations within or between groups at any time interval. Conclusions: Pneumoperitoneum with CO2 during standing laparoscopy in healthy horses does not cause adverse alterations in cardiopulmonary, haematology or plasma chemistry variables, but does induce a mild inflammatory response within the peritoneal cavity. Potential relevance: High pressure (15 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum in standing sedated mature horses for laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely without any short-term or cumulative adverse effects on haemodynamic or cardiopulmonary function. [source] The use of water-jet dissection in open and laparoscopic liver resectionHPB, Issue 4 2008H. G. RAU Abstract Background. We intend to give an overview of our experiences with the implementation of a new dissection technique in open and laparoscopic surgery. Methods. Our database comprises a total of 950 patients who underwent liver resection. Three hundred and fifty of them were performed exceptionally with the water-jet dissector. Forty-one laparoscopic partial liver resections were accomplished. Results. Using the water-jet dissection technique it was possible to reduce the blood loss, the Pringle- and resection time in comparison to CUSA® and blunt dissection. In the last five years we could reduce the Pringle-rate from 48 to 6% and the last 110 liver resections were performed without any Pringle's manoeuvre. At the same time, the transfusion-rate decreased from 1.86 to 0.46 EC/patient. In oncological resections, the used dissection technique had no influence on long-time survival. Conclusions. The water-jet dissection technique is fast, feasible, oncologically safe and can be used in open and in laparoscopic liver surgery. [source] Laparoscopic management of benign liver diseases: where are we?HPB, Issue 4 2004Jean-François Gigot Background The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of benign cystic and solid liver tumours appears to differ according to each tumour type. As regards congenital liver cysts, laparoscopic treatment is now the gold standard for treating selected, huge, accessible, highly symptomatic or complicated cysts. In contrast, the laparoscopic approach is not useful for patients suffering from adult polycystic liver disease (PLD), except for type I PLD with large multiple hepatic cysts. For benign hepatocellular tumours, the surgical management has recently benefited from a better knowledge of the natural history of each type of tumour and from the improvement of imaging techniques in assuring a precise diagnosis of tumour nature. Thus the general tendency has led to a progressive restriction and tailoring of indications for resection in benign liver tumours, selecting only patients with huge, specifically symptomatic or compressive benign tumours or patients suffering from liver cell adenoma. Despite the enthusiastic use of the laparoscopic approach, selective indications for resection of benign liver tumours should indeed remain unchanged. For all types of benign liver tumours, the best indication remains small, superficial lesions, located in the anterior or the lateral segments of the liver. Deep, centrally located lesions or tumours in contact with major vascular or biliary trunks are not ideal candidates for laparoscopic liver resections. When performed by expert liver and laparoscopic surgeons using an adequate surgical technique, the laparoscopic approach is safe for performing minor liver resections and is accompanied by the usual postoperative benefits of laparoscopic surgery. When applied in selected patients and tumours, laparoscopic management of benign liver diseases appears to be a promising technique for hepatobiliary surgeons. [source] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the grossly obese: 4 years experience and review of literatureHPB, Issue 4 2002M Hussien Background Conventional abdominal surgery in grossly obese patients is associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications; thus, laparoscopic surgery may be preferred in these patients. Patients and methods A prospective analysis was performed of 20 grossly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between April 1996 and April 2000 for symptomatic non-complicated gallstone disease. Results Technical problems at operation included difficulty with induction of pneumoperitoneum and introduction of the most lateral subcostal port, retraction of the gallbladder fundus, the need for longer instruments and the closure of the fascia. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully completed in 19 patients, but one patient required conversion to open operation. There were no anaesthetic difficulties. Two patients developed minor chest infections. The mean hospital stay was 2.9 days. Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible and can be recommended for symptomatic gallstone disease in grossly obese patients. [source] Computer-based endoscopic image-processing technology for endourology and laparoscopic surgeryINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 6 2009Tatsuo Igarashi Abstract Endourology and laparoscopic surgery are evolving in accordance with developments in instrumentation and progress in surgical technique. Recent advances in computer and image-processing technology have enabled novel images to be created from conventional endoscopic and laparoscopic video images. Such technology harbors the potential to advance endourology and laparoscopic surgery by adding new value and function to the endoscope. The panoramic and three-dimensional images created by computer processing are two outstanding features that can address the shortcomings of conventional endoscopy and laparoscopy, such as narrow field of view, lack of depth cue, and discontinuous information. The wide panoramic images show an anatomical ,map' of the abdominal cavity and hollow organs with high brightness and resolution, as the images are collected from video images taken in a close-up manner. To assist in laparoscopic surgery, especially in suturing, a three-dimensional movie can be obtained by enhancing movement parallax using a conventional monocular laparoscope. In tubular organs such as the prostatic urethra, reconstruction of three-dimensional structure can be achieved, implying the possibility of a liquid dynamic model for assessing local urethral resistance in urination. Computer-based processing of endoscopic images will establish new tools for endourology and laparoscopic surgery in the near future. [source] How to use laparoscopic surgical instruments safelyINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, Issue 3 2009Eiji Higashihara The development of laparoscopic surgery has been accompanied by a rapid increase in the number of laparoscopic surgical procedures carried out in the field of urology. In 2002 laparoscopic nephrectomy was approved for coverage under Japanese national health insurance, and in 2003 there were over 1000 registered cases in which this procedure was carried out. This suggests that laparoscopic nephrectomy, a procedure formerly conducted at only a few institutions, is now spreading to hospitals across Japan. Laparoscopic surgery involves the use of specialized instruments within a restricted field of vision, and risky surgical techniques can potentially result in visceral or vascular damage. In order to promote the use of safe laparoscopic surgery procedures, the Japanese Urological Association and the Japanese Society of Endourology and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) have inaugurated a certification program for urologic laparoscopy. This program not only encourages development in this field of surgery and provides technical certification to ensure appropriate levels of expertise, but also reviews methods for the correct use of instruments such as trocars and hemostats. The purpose of this video is to present correct methods for the use of a variety of laparoscopic instruments, in order to increase the safety of this procedure. The video has been designed to be useful not only for practitioners who are just beginning laparoscopy, but also for those who already have extensive laparoscopic experience. The video discusses five laparoscopic instruments (trocar, electric surgical devices, ultrasonic surgery devices, clips and clip appliers and endo-staplers), and demonstrates their correct use. In addition, animal models are used to illustrate the potential complications that can be associated with some methods of use. [source] |