Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (laparoscopic + colorectal_surgery)
Selected AbstractsThe uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBICOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2009K. E. Schwab Abstract Objective, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recommended laparoscopic resection as an alternative to open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Method, A questionnaire was distributed to members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) regarding their current surgical practice. Results were analysed individually, by region, and nationwide. Results, Information was received on 436 consultants (in 155 replies), of whom 233 (53%) perform laparoscopic colorectal procedures. During the previous year, 25% of colorectal resections were performed laparoscopically by the respondents. However, of those surgeons who were performing laparoscopic resections, only 30% performed more than half of all their resections laparoscopically. Right hemicolectomy, left-sided resections, and rectopexy were the most frequently performed laparoscopic resections. There was an even distribution throughout the country of consultants performing laparoscopic resections (regional IQR 48,60%). The main reason for consultants not performing laparoscopic procedures was a lack of training or funding. Conclusion, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is being performed by more than half (53%) of colorectal consultants nationwide, although only a quarter of all procedures are being undertaken laparoscopically. [source] The effect of regional anaesthesia on haemodynamic changes occurring during laparoscopic colorectal surgeryANAESTHESIA, Issue 7 2009B. Levy No abstract is available for this article. [source] Laparoscopic anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer: Patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathwayASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, Issue 1 2010T.W. Hsu Abstract Introduction: A clinical pathway designed for a single type of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer might be helpful in decreasing complication rates and total hospital costs. It has been reported to be effective in reducing costs and shortening length of hospital stays in many situations such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, colon resection, total colectomy, and gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as when caring for patients in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods: A clinical pathway, including surgical details and perioperative management, for patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer was designed and implemented. From January 2003 to December 2006, it was applied to 80 patients. Results: The average length of a hospital stay for these patients was 9.06 d. The mean hospital stay and total cost decreased year by year. The overall complication rate was 8.75% without perioperative mortality, and 47.5% of patients with underlying diseases were treated safely. Discussion: Laparoscopic anterior resection for rectosigmoid cancer, with curative or palliative intent, was safe after standardization of surgical details and perioperative management. The total hospital costs for each patient was predictable and decreased year by year. [source] Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: Japanese experienceASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, Issue 2 2009F Konishi Abstract In Japan, laparoscopic colectomy for cancer started in 1992. A national survey has revealed that, since that time, the number of cases that have undergone this procedure has steadily increased, and by 2007, there were over 9000 cases. This figure includes an increase in the percentage of more advanced cases, which has occurred due to technical improvements in lymph node dissection. A Japanese randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic to open surgery started in November 2004, with enrollment ending in April 2009 with 1050 cases. For this study, preoperative stage T3 and T4 cases were selected for inclusion, and D3 dissection was required. To assess the technical skill of surgeons, the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery established the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System to encourage high-level surgical techniques. Assessment is conducted by reviewing unedited videos. The success rate for colon and rectal surgeries has ranged between 37%,40%. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System has contributed to the establishment of standard technical skills in laparoscopic surgery, the development of an educational system for laparoscopic surgeons, and a reduction in the number complications. Technical difficulties still exist in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, but with the technical progress in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, the number of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries has been gradually increasing in number. A multicentric phase II study on the feasibility and long-term outcome for stage I and II rectal cancer started in 2008. In this study, the short-term outcomes including anastomotic leakage rate and long-term survival, will be clarified. Combined with continuously improved technologies, training techniques and surgical standards, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is steadily progressing in Japan. [source] Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and reliable technique even for complex rectal lesionsBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 7 2008R. J. Darwood Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for the excision of rectal lesions, with lower morbidity and mortality rates than open surgery. Following advances in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and endoscopic mucosal resection, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TEM in the treatment of complex rectal lesions. Methods: All patients were entered into a prospective database. Complex lesions were identified as high (more than 15 cm from anorectal margin), large (maximum dimension over 8 cm), involving two or more rectal quadrants, or recurrent. Results: Seventy-one lesions (13 carcinomas and 58 tubulovillous adenomas) were identified. The median duration of operation was 60 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 30,80) min, with an estimated median blood loss of 0 (i.q.r. 0,10) ml. Median hospital stay was 2 (i.q.r. 1,3) days. One patient developed postoperative urinary retention and one returned with rectal bleeding that did not require further surgery. Two patients developed rectal strictures after operation that were dilated successfully. There was no recurrence of benign lesions during a median follow-up of 21 (i.q.r. 6·5,35) months. Conclusion: TEM is a safe technique with low associated morbidity, even when used to excise complex rectal lesions. As such it remains the treatment of choice for rectal lesions not requiring primary radical resection. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic colorectal surgery,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 12 2007J. Wind Background: Anastomotic leakage is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefits of a laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic surgery. Methods: Between January 2003 and January 2006, ten patients who had laparoscopic colorectal resection and later developed anastomotic leakage had a laparoscopic reintervention. A second group included 15 patients who had relaparotomy after primary open surgery. Results: Patient characteristics were comparable in the two groups. The median time from first operation to reintervention was 6 days in both groups. There were no conversions. The intensive care stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (1 versus 3 days; P = 0·002). Resumption of a normal diet (median 3 versus 6 days; P = 0·031) and first stoma output (2 versus 3 days; P = 0·041) occurred earlier in the laparoscopic group. The postoperative 30-day morbidity rate was lower (four of ten patients versus 12 of 15; P = 0·087) and hospital stay was shorter (median 9 versus 13 days; P = 0·058) in the laparoscopic group. No patient developed incisional hernia in the laparoscopic group compared with five of 15 in the open group (P = 0·061). Conclusion: These data suggest that laparoscopic reintervention for anastomotic leakage after primary laparoscopic surgery is associated with less morbidity, faster recovery and fewer abdominal wall complications than relaparotomy. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] The uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: a questionnaire survey of consultant members of the ACPGBICOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2009K. E. Schwab Abstract Objective, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recommended laparoscopic resection as an alternative to open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Method, A questionnaire was distributed to members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) regarding their current surgical practice. Results were analysed individually, by region, and nationwide. Results, Information was received on 436 consultants (in 155 replies), of whom 233 (53%) perform laparoscopic colorectal procedures. During the previous year, 25% of colorectal resections were performed laparoscopically by the respondents. However, of those surgeons who were performing laparoscopic resections, only 30% performed more than half of all their resections laparoscopically. Right hemicolectomy, left-sided resections, and rectopexy were the most frequently performed laparoscopic resections. There was an even distribution throughout the country of consultants performing laparoscopic resections (regional IQR 48,60%). The main reason for consultants not performing laparoscopic procedures was a lack of training or funding. Conclusion, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is being performed by more than half (53%) of colorectal consultants nationwide, although only a quarter of all procedures are being undertaken laparoscopically. [source] Enhanced postoperative recovery and laparoscopic colorectal surgeryCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 3 2007H. S. Tilney No abstract is available for this article. [source] | ||||||||||