Home  About us  Contact
 

Label Change (label + change)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Awareness of potential valvulopathy risk with pergolide and changes in clinical practice after label change: a survey among European neurologists

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 6 2007
A. LLedó
In response to concern about the reported frequency of ergot-associated valvulopathy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), Eli Lilly and Company updated the Risk Minimization Program for pergolide, changing the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and distributing a Dear Doctor Letter (DDL) highlighting the new label changes. A survey was conducted subsequently to assess neurologists' awareness of the revised SmPC and their resulting changes in practice. A random sample of 20.3% of neurologists (n = 4056) from 12 eligible EU countries were invited to participate. Of the target population of 247 neurologists who treated patients with PD, used pergolide in 2005, and were willing to participate, 244 (99%) responded. Overall awareness of the DDL and the SmPC changes was 94.2%. Over half (58.3%) of neurologists indicated that they prescribe pergolide exclusively as second-line treatment, although some (21.9%) used pergolide exclusively as first-line treatment. In response to the DDL, most neurologists perform echocardiograms before treatment (67.5%) and during treatment (76.7%), and over half (55%) avoid prescribing doses >5 mg/day. Overall, use of a DDL to communicate an SmPC change was effective in increasing the awareness of pergolide-associated valvulopathy and in modifying neurologists' clinical practice to minimize this risk. [source]

Olanzapine: interpreting the label change

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 12 2007
L. Citrome MD
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Awareness of potential valvulopathy risk with pergolide and changes in clinical practice after label change: a survey among European neurologists

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 6 2007
A. LLedó
In response to concern about the reported frequency of ergot-associated valvulopathy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), Eli Lilly and Company updated the Risk Minimization Program for pergolide, changing the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and distributing a Dear Doctor Letter (DDL) highlighting the new label changes. A survey was conducted subsequently to assess neurologists' awareness of the revised SmPC and their resulting changes in practice. A random sample of 20.3% of neurologists (n = 4056) from 12 eligible EU countries were invited to participate. Of the target population of 247 neurologists who treated patients with PD, used pergolide in 2005, and were willing to participate, 244 (99%) responded. Overall awareness of the DDL and the SmPC changes was 94.2%. Over half (58.3%) of neurologists indicated that they prescribe pergolide exclusively as second-line treatment, although some (21.9%) used pergolide exclusively as first-line treatment. In response to the DDL, most neurologists perform echocardiograms before treatment (67.5%) and during treatment (76.7%), and over half (55%) avoid prescribing doses >5 mg/day. Overall, use of a DDL to communicate an SmPC change was effective in increasing the awareness of pergolide-associated valvulopathy and in modifying neurologists' clinical practice to minimize this risk. [source]

Postmarketing drug dosage changes of 499 FDA-approved new molecular entities, 1980,1999,

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, Issue 6 2002
James Cross MS
Abstract Purpose Risks and benefits of marketed drugs can be improved by changing their labels to optimize dosage regimens for indicated populations. Such postmarketing label changes may reflect the quality of pre-marketing development, regulatory review, and postmarketing surveillance. We documented dosage changes of FDA-approved new molecular entities (NMEs), and investigated trends over time and across therapeutic groups, on the premise that improved drug development methods have yielded fewer postmarketing label changes over time. Methods We compiled a list of NMEs approved by FDA from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 1999 using FDA's website, Freedom of Information Act request, and PhRMA (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America) database. Original labeled dosages and indicated patient populations were tracked in labels in the Physician's Desk Reference®. Time and covariate-adjusted risks for dosage changes by 5-year epoch and therapeutic groups were estimated by survival analysis. Results Of 499 NMEs, 354 (71%) were evaluable. Dosage changes in indicated populations occurred in 73 NMEs (21%). A total of 58 (79%) were safety-motivated, net dosage decreases. Percentage of NMEs with changes by therapeutic group ranged from 27.3% for neuropharmacologic drugs to 13.6% for miscellaneous drugs. Median time to change following approval fell from 6.5 years (1980,1984) to 2.0 years (1995,1999). Contrary to our premise, 1995,1999 NMEs were 3.15 times more likely to change in comparison to 1980,1984 NMEs (p,=,0.008, Cox analysis). Conclusions Dosages of one in five NMEs changed, four in five changes were safety reductions. Increasing frequency of changes, independent of therapeutic group, may reflect intensified postmarketing surveillance and underscores the need to improve pre-marketing optimization of dosage and indicated population. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]