			Home About us Contact

Laryngotracheal Reconstruction (laryngotracheal + reconstruction)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Microbiology of Stents in Laryngotracheal Reconstruction,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 2 2004
Payman Simoni MD
Abstract Objectives: Granulation tissue often forms around a laryngotracheal stent, tracheostomy tube, or other airway prosthesis, especially if infection occurs. We studied the types and frequency of organisms colonizing stents used in pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction. Study Design: This prospective study included 21 patients undergoing 23 consecutive laryngotracheal reconstructions with stents between 1991 and 1999. Methods: After endoscopic removal, each laryngotracheal stent was placed immediately in a sterile container and transported to the laboratory. Specimens for culture were obtained from biofilms on the stents and plated on agars for growth of aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal organisms. Culture results were analyzed with regard to patient age, duration of stenting, and graft type. Results: All stents were colonized with more than one pathogen (range 2,7). The most frequent aerobic isolates were Streptococcus viridians, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenza, and Neisseria species. Anaerobic organisms were isolated in 26% of cases. Candida species were isolated in 57% of the cases; patients whose stents were colonized with Candida were significantly (P = .007) older (mean 77.5 months) than those not colonized with this organism (mean 26.1 months) Conclusions: The antibiotic agents currently used for children undergoing laryngotracheal reconstruction target mainly aerobic organisms. Despite prophylactic measures, the incidence of granulation tissue formation is clinically significant, and the prevalence of anaerobic, including fungal, pathogens is high. Antibiotic therapy directed toward controlling anaerobic and fungal organisms could help in controlling local inflammation and thus granulation tissue formation. [source]

Benefit of Feeding Assessment Before Pediatric Airway Reconstruction ,

THE LARYNGOSCOPE, Issue 5 2000
Jay Paul Willging MD
Abstract Objectives/Hypothesis To determine the utility of preoperative feeding assessments in children undergoing airway reconstruction, identifying parameters that correlate with functional deficits in swallowing and postoperative feeding difficulties. Study Design Prospective, sequential enrollment. Methods Two hundred fifty-five patients with structural abnormalities of the upper aerodigestive tract underwent endoscopic swallow studies. Classification of preoperative feeding abilities, specific feeding disorders, and abnormal endoscopic feeding parameters were used to predict the postoperative course of patients undergoing airway reconstruction. The relationships between diagnoses and functional feeding categories and postoperative outcomes and functional feeding categories were appraised by ,2 analysis. Results The median age of the study population was 2.5 years. Fifty-three percent of the patients were tracheotomy dependent. Only 13% of the patients had diagnoses limited to the airway, with 45% of patients having three or more diagnoses. Worse preoperative feeding abilities were associated with the presence of a tracheotomy, age 2 years or less, and multiple underlying diagnoses. Neurological diagnoses were associated with worse feeding abilities. Preoperative feeding assessments directly altered the course of management of 15% of operative patients, by recommending a delay in the surgical correction, the placement of a gastrostomy tube preoperatively, or a modification in the surgical reconstruction planned for the patient. Postoperative airway protection predictions were 80% accurate. Twelve percent of the predictions involved patients who developed unforeseen complications that required additional treatments or prolonged the hospital stay secondary to difficulties with airway protection. There was no correlation between the preoperative feeding abilities of the patients and their postoperative course after airway reconstruction. Conclusion Transient dysphagia is common after laryngotracheal reconstruction. Preoperative feeding abilities do not correlate with the postoperative airway protection abilities of a patient. Feeding assessments before pediatric airway reconstruction provide a means of identifying patients with poor airway protection mechanisms that may compromise the patient after reconstruction. Findings on swallowing evaluations that predict poor airway protective mechanisms are 1) pooling of secretions in the hypopharynx, 2) poor oral motor skills, allowing premature spillage of material into the hypopharynx where it penetrates the larynx, and 3) residue that persists in the hypopharynx after multiple swallows. The integration of information generated from the preoperative swallowing assessment promotes the selection of operative procedures that are optimal for that patient and highlights specific therapy issues that may need to be addressed in the postoperative management of the patient that may not have been obvious without the study. [source]

Paediatric airway stenosis: laryngotracheal reconstruction or cricotracheal resection?

CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, Issue 5 2000
B.E.J. Hartley
Modern surgical management of paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis includes a wide variety of surgical procedures. These can broadly be divided into two groups. First, laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) procedures in which the cricoid cartilage is split and the framework is expanded with various combinations of cartilage grafts and stents; and second, cricotracheal resection (CTR) where a segmental excision of the stenotic segment is done and an end-to-end anastomosis is performed. In this article we review the literature and our experience and discuss the relative indications for CTR and LTR in children. High decannulation rates have been reported for CTR; however, it remains a more extensive procedure than LTR involving extensive tracheal mobilization. If the tracheostomy site is included in the resection then a significant length of trachea is excised. Alternatively, LTR with cartilage grafting can precisely correct a specific stenosis with minimum morbidity and high decannulation rates for grade 2 and selected grade 3 stenosis. For the more severe stenosis treatment with LTR has been less successful. Retrospective data from this institution suggests that the children with grade 4 stenosis treated with LTR are more likely to require a subsequent open procedure to achieve decannulation than those treated with CTR. LTR is a less extensive procedure and is preferred for grade 2, selected grade 3 stenosis. CTR is the preferred option for grade 4 and severe grade 3 stenosis with a clear margin between the stenosis and the vocal cords. [source]