Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
LDL-C Reduction (ldl-c + reduction)
Selected AbstractsSafety and efficacy of ezetimibe monotherapy in 1624 primary hypercholesterolaemic patients for up to 2 yearsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 9 2008C. A. Dujovne Summary Aims:, This report examined the safety and efficacy of treatment for up to 2 years with the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe (EZE). Methods:, Two identical, randomised, double-blind trials (starting with 827 and 892 patients), evaluated the efficacy and safety of EZE 10 mg/day vs. placebo for 12 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 3.3,5.1 mmol/l]. Upon completion of these base studies, patients were offered a 2-year, open-label extension study. Adverse event (AE) reports for EZE monotherapy-treated patients were summarised for 3-month intervals to allow for comparison with the placebo group of the 3-month base studies. The primary end-point for this analysis was the evaluation of the long-term safety and tolerability of EZE 10 mg monotherapy dosed daily for up to 24 months. Results:, The incidences of new AEs, treatment-related (TR) AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs during any 3-month interval were comparable with the respective observations in the placebo group of the base studies. The incidences of AEs, TRAEs, SAEs, TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs decreased in almost every interval compared with earlier intervals throughout the 2-year study. In addition, the incidences of , 3-fold consecutive elevations of liver transaminases (0.7%) or , 10-fold increases in creatine phosphokinase (0.4%) for the entire 2-year treatment period were comparable with those of the placebo group (0.7% and 0.2% respectively). LDL-C reductions of ,18% were maintained throughout the study. Conclusions:, Compared with placebo, treatment with EZE for up to 2 years in 1624 patients showed no evidence of increased incidence of AEs with increased treatment duration, while showing sustained effects on LDL-C reduction. [source] Enhanced LDL-C reduction: lower is better.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 4 2008Does it matter how? No abstract is available for this article. [source] Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Long term clinical course and plasma exchange therapy for two individual patients and review of the literatureJOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, Issue 6 2009Roy Beigel Abstract Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disease. Homozygous FH (HFH) manifests with severe hypercholesterolemia since birth (cholesterol levels >5,6 the upper normal limit), which, if untreated, leads to early onset accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary death, usually before the 2nd or 3rd decades of life. Various invasive procedures (iliocecal bypass, porto-caval shunt, liver transplant, and gene therapy) have been introduced for lowering low density lipoprotein (LDL) aiming at reducing atherosclerosis and improving survival of HFH patients. Of all the various methods, LDL apheresis has become the most attractive. Although its impressive effect on LDL-C reduction is well established, its long-term (of more than 10 year) effect on the atherosclerotic process and specifically cardiac end-points in HFH is hardly documented. We herewith report on the longest term lipophoresis so far reported in two HFH patients, each treated with plasma-exchange and LDL-apheresis for more than 20 years. The observations provide an opportunity to focus on various aspects regarding not only the procedure itself but also its effect on various clinical endpoints. By this description together with reviewing the literature, we discuss several issues, some of them are generalized while others are individualized, dealing with the approach of long term LDL apheresis in HFH. J. Clin. Apheresis 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Risks and benefits of continued aggressive statin therapyCLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue S3 2003Antonio M. Gotto Jr. M.D., D.PHIL Abstract The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are a well-tolerated, effective class of medications for the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol levels. Extensive data from clinical trials demonstrate that these agents reduce fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular risk in primary and secondary prevention patients, including women and the elderly. A threshold value for LDL-C reduction below which there is no further clinical benefit has not yet been identified. In the Heart Protection Study (HPS), significant relative risk reduction occurred even among patients with LDL-C levels < 2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl). Statin therapy also produced reductions in cardiovascular disease in a wide range of high-risk patients regardless of baseline cholesterol levels. Rhabdomyolysis, typically defined as muscle pain or weakness associated with creatine kinase levels higher than 10 times the upper limit of normal and the presence of myoglobulinuria, is a rare but potentially serious complication of statins. Although dose-dependent transaminase elevations occur in 0.5 to 2% of cases, it has not been determined whether these elevations qualify as true drug-related hepatotoxicity. Management of myopathy and elevated transaminases is addressed in a joint publication from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Because statins have significant potential benefits and a low risk for serious adverse effects, aggressive therapy should be considered in patients at high risk for coronary heart disease. [source] Safety and efficacy of ezetimibe monotherapy in 1624 primary hypercholesterolaemic patients for up to 2 yearsINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 9 2008C. A. Dujovne Summary Aims:, This report examined the safety and efficacy of treatment for up to 2 years with the cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe (EZE). Methods:, Two identical, randomised, double-blind trials (starting with 827 and 892 patients), evaluated the efficacy and safety of EZE 10 mg/day vs. placebo for 12 weeks in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) 3.3,5.1 mmol/l]. Upon completion of these base studies, patients were offered a 2-year, open-label extension study. Adverse event (AE) reports for EZE monotherapy-treated patients were summarised for 3-month intervals to allow for comparison with the placebo group of the 3-month base studies. The primary end-point for this analysis was the evaluation of the long-term safety and tolerability of EZE 10 mg monotherapy dosed daily for up to 24 months. Results:, The incidences of new AEs, treatment-related (TR) AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs during any 3-month interval were comparable with the respective observations in the placebo group of the base studies. The incidences of AEs, TRAEs, SAEs, TRSAEs and discontinuations as a result of AEs decreased in almost every interval compared with earlier intervals throughout the 2-year study. In addition, the incidences of , 3-fold consecutive elevations of liver transaminases (0.7%) or , 10-fold increases in creatine phosphokinase (0.4%) for the entire 2-year treatment period were comparable with those of the placebo group (0.7% and 0.2% respectively). LDL-C reductions of ,18% were maintained throughout the study. Conclusions:, Compared with placebo, treatment with EZE for up to 2 years in 1624 patients showed no evidence of increased incidence of AEs with increased treatment duration, while showing sustained effects on LDL-C reduction. [source] Improving lipid management , to titrate, combine or switchINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, Issue 7 2004H. Schuster Summary Despite the benefits of statin therapy, cholesterol management remains suboptimal and many patients do not achieve their recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. The use of insufficient doses, limited drug effectiveness and poor patient compliance may contribute to the treatment gap. Options for improving lipid management include dose titration, combination therapy or prescribing a more efficacious statin. LDL-C reductions are generally modest when patients' current statin dose is titrated, and there may be an increased potential for adverse effects. Combining statin therapy with another lipid-modifying agent can provide additional LDL-C reductions, but cost, tolerability and compliance should be considered. In general, switching to a more efficacious statin is a cost-effective way of enabling more patients to achieve recommended targets without increasing dosages. When considering the options available, physicians should balance efficacy, cost and safety to enable more patients to attain LDL-C goals and achieve greater therapeutic gain from statin treatment. [source] Efficacy and safety of DALI LDL-apheresis at high blood flow rates: A prospective multicenter studyJOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, Issue 4 2003T. Wendler Abstract Direct adsorption of lipids (DALI) is the first LDL-apheresis method compatible with whole blood. Usually, the blood flow rate is adjusted at 60,80 ml/min, which results in session times of about 2 hr. The present study was performed to test the safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] removal by DALI at high blood flow rates in order to reduce treatment time. Thirteen chronic DALI patients in seven centers suffering from hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C 162 ± 42 mg/dl at baseline) and coronary artery disease were treated on a weekly or biweekly basis by DALI apheresis. The blood flow rate QB was held constant for at least two sessions, respectively, and was increased from 60 to 80, 120, 160, 200, and 240 ml/min. All patients had pre-existing av-fistulas. The anticoagulation was performed by a heparin bolus plus ACD-A at a ratio of citrate: blood ranging from 1:20 to 1:90. Clinically, the sessions were well tolerated and only 26/201 sessions (12%) of the treatments were fraught with minor adverse events. Acute LDL-C reductions (derived from LDL-C levels determined by lipoprotein electrophoresis) averaged 72/66/60/53/50/48% for QB = 60/80/120/160/200/240 ml/min. Lp(a) reductions were 68/67/62/60/58/56%, whereas HDL-C losses were ,10%. Routine blood chemistries and blood cell counts remained in the normal range. Treatment times averaged 142/83/45 min at Qb = 60/120/240 ml/min. On average, DALI LDL-apheresis could be performed safely and effectively at high blood flow rates up to at least 120 ml/min in patients with good blood access, which significantly reduced treatment time from 142 to 83 min (,42%). J. Clin. Apheresis 18:157,166, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] | ||||||||||