Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Islet Transplants (islet + transplant)
Selected AbstractsClinical islet transplant: current and future directions towards toleranceIMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2003A. M. James Shapiro Summary:, The ultimate goal of islet transplantation is to completely correct the diabetic state from an unlimited donor source, without the need for chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy. Although islet transplantation provides an opportunity to develop innovative strategies for tolerance in the clinic, both alloimmune and autoimmune barriers must be controlled, if stable graft function is to be maintained long-term. After islet extraction from the pancreas, the cellular graft may be stored in tissue culture or cryopreserved for banking, providing an opportunity not only to optimally condition the recipient but also to allow in vitro immunologic manipulation of the graft before transplantation, unlike solid organ grafts. As such, islets may be considered a ,special case.' Remarkable progress has occurred in the last three years, with dramatic improvements in outcomes after clinical islet transplantation. The introduction of a steroid-free, sirolimus-based, anti-rejection protocol and islets prepared from two (or rarely three) donors led to high rates of insulin independence. The ,Edmonton Protocol' has been successfully replicated by other centers in an international multicenter trial. A number of key refinements in pancreas transportation, processing, purification on non-ficoll-based media, storage of islets in culture for two days and newer immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to continued advancement through extensive collaboration between key centers. This review outlines the historical development of islet transplantation over the past 30 years, provides an update on current clinical outcomes, and summarizes a series of unique opportunities for development and early testing of tolerance protocols in patients. [source] Human liver-derived cells stably modified for regulated proinsulin secretion function as bioimplants in vivoTHE JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE, Issue 4 2002Xiang Chen Abstract Background Insulin deficiency is currently treated with pharmacological insulin secretagogues, insulin injections or islet transplants. Secondary failure of pharmacological agents is common; insulin injections often fail to achieve euglycemic control; and islet transplants are rare. Non-, cells capable of regulated insulin secretion in vivo could be a functional cure for diabetes. Hepatocytes are good candidates, being naturally glucose-responsive, protein-secreting cells, while the liver is positioned to receive direct nutrient signals that regulate insulin production. Methods Human liver-derived Chang cells were modified with a plasmid construct in which a bifunctional promoter comprising carbohydrate response elements and the human metallothionein IIA promoter controlled human proinsulin cDNA expression. Secretory responses of stable cell clones were characterized in vitro and in vivo by proinsulin radioimmunoassay. Results Transfected Chang cells secreted 5,8,pmol proinsulin/106 cells per 24,h in continuous passage for at least a year in response to 5,25,mM glucose and 10,90,µM zinc in vitro. Glucose and zinc synergistically increased proinsulin production by up to 30-fold. Non-glucose secretagogues were also active. Glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) and glucokinase cDNA co-transfection enhanced glucose responsiveness. Intraperitoneally implanted Chang cells secreted proinsulin in scid and Balb/c mice. Serum proinsulin levels were further increased 1.3-fold (p<0.05) after glucose and 1.4- to 1.6-fold (p<0.005) after zinc administration in vivo. Conclusions These results are the first to demonstrate stable proinsulin production in a human liver-derived cell line with activity in vitro and in vivo and provide a basis for engineering hepatocytes as in vivo bioimplants for future diabetes treatment. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Experience with a Novel Efalizumab-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen to Facilitate Single Donor Islet Cell TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010N. A. Turgeon Islet transplantation is an experimental therapy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). It remains limited by immunosuppressive drug toxicity, progressive loss of insulin independence, allosensitization and the need for multiple islet donors. We describe our experience with an efalizumab-based immunosuppressive regimen as compared to the prevailing standard regimen, the Edmonton protocol. Twelve patients with T1DM received islet transplants: eight were treated with the Edmonton protocol; four were treated with daclizumab induction, a 6-month course of tacrolimus, and maintenance with efalizumab and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was insulin independence after one islet infusion. Only two Edmonton protocol treated patients achieved the primary endpoint; six required islets from multiple donors, and all experienced leukopenia, mouth ulcers, anemia, diarrhea and hypertransaminasemia. Four became allosensitized. All patients treated with the efalizumab-based regimen achieved insulin independence with normal hemoglobin A1c after a single islet cell infusion and remained insulin independent while on efalizumab. These patients experienced significantly fewer side effects and none became allosensitized. Trial continuation was terminated by withdrawal of efalizumab from the market. These data suggest that this efalizumab-based regimen prevents islet rejection, is well tolerated, and allows for single donor islet transplantation. [source] Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetics Using an Immunosuppressive Protocol Based on the Anti-LFA-1 Antibody EfalizumabAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010A. M. Posselt The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival. [source] Impaired Proinsulin Processing is a Characteristic of Transplanted IsletsAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2009A. M. Klimek We sought to determine whether recipients of islet transplants have defective proinsulin processing. Individuals who had islet allo- or autotransplantation were compared to healthy nondiabetic subjects. Insulin (I), total proinsulin (TP), intact proinsulin and C-peptide (CP) were measured in samples of fasting serum by immunoassay, and the ratios of TP/TP+I and TP/CP were calculated. Islet allotransplant recipients had elevated TP levels relative to nondiabetic controls (16.8 [5.5,28.8] vs. 8.4 [4.0,21.8] pmol/L; p < 0.05) and autologous transplant recipients (7.3 [0.3,82.3] pmol/L; p < 0.05). Islet autotransplant recipients had significantly higher TP/TP+I ratios relative to nondiabetic controls (35.9 ± 6.4 vs. 13.9 ± 1.4%; p < 0.001). Islet allotransplant recipients, some of whom were on insulin, tended to have higher TP/TP+I ratios. The TP/CP ratio was significantly higher in both islet autotransplant (8.9 [0.6,105.2]; p < 0.05) and allotransplant recipients (2.4 [0.8,8.8]; p < 0.001) relative to nondiabetic controls (1.4 [0.5,2.6]%). Consistent with these findings, TP/TP+I and TP/CP values in islet autotransplant recipients increased significantly by 1-year posttransplant compared to preoperative levels (TP/CP: 3.8 ± 0.6 vs. 23.3 ± 7.9%; p < 0.05). Both allo- and autotransplant subjects who received <10 000 IE/kg had higher TP/CP ratios than those who received >10 000 IE/kg. Islet transplant recipients exhibit defects in the processing of proinsulin similar to that observed in subjects with type 2 diabetes manifest as higher levels of total proinsulin and increased TP/TP+I and TP/CP ratios. [source] Long-Term Survival of Nonhuman Primate Islets Implanted in an Omental Pouch on a Biodegradable ScaffoldAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2009D. M. Berman The aim of this study was to test whether an omental pouch can be used as an alternative site for islet implantation in diabetic monkeys. Here we report the successful engraftment of islets in diabetic cynomolgus monkeys when loaded on a synthetic biodegradable scaffold and placed in an omental pouch. One autologous and five allogeneic diabetic monkey transplants under the cover of steroid-free immune suppression (SFIS) were undertaken. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and C-peptide (CP), exogenous insulin requirements (EIR), intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), A1C and histopathology were used to assess islet engraftment and survival. All animals achieved CP levels > 1.0 ng/mL following transplant, a 66,92% posttransplant decrease in EIR and reduced A1C. Following graft removal, CP became negative and histopathological analysis of the explanted grafts demonstrated well-granulated and well-vascularized, insulin-positive islets, surrounded by T-cell subsets and macrophages. Compared to intrahepatic allogeneic islet transplants (n = 20), there was a delayed engraftment for omental pouch recipients but similar levels of CP production were ultimately achieved, with a broad range of IEQ/kg transplanted in both sites. Our results suggest this extrahepatic transplantation site has potential as an alternative site for clinical islet cell transplantation. [source] Prolonged Insulin Independence After Islet Allotransplants in Recipients with Type 1 DiabetesAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2008M. D. Bellin We sought to determine the long-term outcomes in type 1 diabetic recipients of intraportal alloislet transplants on a modified immunosuppressive protocol. Six recipients with hypoglycemia unawareness received one to two islet infusions. Induction therapy was with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus etanercept for tumor necrosis factor-, blockade. Recipients received cyclosporine and everolimus for maintenance immunosuppression for the first year posttransplant, with mycophenolic acid or mycophenolate mofetil subsequently substituted for everolimus. Recipients have been followed for 1173 ± 270 days since their last infusion for islet graft function (insulin independence, hemoglobin A1c levels and C-peptide production) and for adverse events associated with the study protocol. Of the six recipients, five were insulin-independent at 1 year, and four continue to be insulin-independent at a mean of 3.4 ± 0.4 years posttransplant. None of the six recipients experienced recurrence of severe hypoglycemia. Measured glomerular filtration rate decreased from 110.5 ± 21.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 pretransplant to 82.6 ±19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 year posttransplant. In conclusion, islet transplants restored insulin independence for a mean of >3 years in four of six recipients treated with ATG and etanercept induction therapy and with cyclosporine and, initially, everolimus for maintenance. Our results suggest this immunosuppressive protocol may allow long-term graft survival. [source] Pretransplant HLA Antibodies Are Associated with Reduced Graft Survival After Clinical Islet TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 5 2007P. M. Campbell Despite significant improvements in islet transplantation, long-term graft function is still not optimal. It is likely that both immune and nonimmune factors are involved in the deterioration of islet function over time. Historically, the pretransplant T-cell crossmatch and antibody screening were done by anti-human globulin,complement-dependent cytotoxicity (AHG-CDC). Class II antibodies were not evaluated. In 2003, we introduced solid-phase antibody screening using flow-based beads and flow crossmatching. We were interested to know whether pretransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies or a positive flow crossmatch impacted islet function post-transplant. A total of 152 islet transplants was performed in 81 patients. Islet function was determined by a positive C-peptide. Results were analyzed by procedure. Class I and class II panel reactive antibody (PRA) > 15% and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were associated with a reduced C-peptide survival (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). A positive T- and or B-cell crossmatch alone was not. Pretransplant HLA antibodies detectable by flow beads are associated with reduced graft survival. This suggests that the sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may not control the alloimmune response in this presensitized population and individuals with a PRA > 15% may require more aggressive inductive and maintenance immunosuppression, or represent a group that may not benefit from islet transplantation. [source] Growing Pains from The Islet Cell Transplant WorldAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 1 2007Y. Kudva Considering the limited long-term survival of islet transplants, the degree of renal damage observed in islet transplants is a concern. See also article by Senior et al in this issue on page 91. [source] Adhesion of pancreatic beta cells to biopolymer filmsBIOPOLYMERS, Issue 8 2009S. Janette Williams Abstract Dramatic reversal of Type 1 diabetes in patients receiving pancreatic islet transplants continues to prompt vigorous research concerning the basic mechanisms underlying patient turnaround. At the most fundamental level, transplanted islets must maintain viability and function in vitro and in vivo and should be protected from host immune rejection. Our previous reports showed enhancement of islet viability and insulin secretion per tissue mass for small islets (<125 ,m) as compared with large islets (>125 ,m), thus, demonstrating the effect of enhancing the mass transport of islets (i.e. increasing tissue surface area to volume ratio). Here, we report the facile dispersion of rat islets into individual cells that are layered onto the surface of a biopolymer film towards the ultimate goal of improving mass transport in islet tissue. The tightly packed structure of intact islets was disrupted by incubating in calcium-free media resulting in fragmented islets, which were further dispersed into individual or small groups of cells by using a low concentration of papain. The dispersed cells were screened for adhesion to a range of biopolymers and the nature of cell adhesion was characterized for selected groups by quantifying adherent cells, measuring the surface area coverage of the cells, and immunolabeling cells for adhesion proteins interacting with selected biopolymers. Finally, beta cells in suspension were centrifuged to form controlled numbers of cell layers on films for future work determining the mass transport limitations in the adhered tissue constructs. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 676,685, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The "Published Online" date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com [source] | ||||||||||