Home About us Contact | |||
Irradiance Values (irradiance + value)
Selected AbstractsIrradiance Uniformity and Distribution from Dental Light Curing UnitsJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 2 2010FDS RCS (Edin), FRCD(c), RICHARD B. T. PRICE BDS ABSTRACT Problem:, The irradiance from dental light-curing units (LCUs) is commonly reported as a single number, but this number does not properly describe the light output. Purpose:, This study examined the irradiance uniformity and distribution from a variety of LCUs as well as the effect of different light guides. Materials and Methods:, Five LCUs representing quartz-tungsten-halogen, plasma arc, and light emitting diode units were evaluated. One LCU was evaluated using two different light guides (Standard or Turbo style). The total power emitted from each LCU was measured and the irradiance calculated using conventional methods (ICM). In addition, a beam profiler was used to determine the optically active emitting area, the mean irradiance (IBP), the irradiance distribution, and the Top Hat Factor (THF). Five replications were performed for each test and compared using analysis of variance with Fisher's PLSD tests at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. Results:, The spatial distribution of the irradiance from LCUs was neither universally symmetrical nor was it uniformly distributed across the tip end. Significant differences in both the emitted power and THF were found among the LCUs. The THF values ranged from a high of 0.74 ± 0.01 to a low of 0.32 ± 0.01. Changing from a standard to a turbo light guide increased the irradiance, but significantly reduced beam homogeneity, reduced the total emitted power, and reduced the optical tip area by 60%. Conclusions:, Using different light guides on the same LCU significantly affected the power output, irradiance values, and beam homogeneity. For all LCUs, irradiance values calculated using conventional methods (ICM) did not represent the irradiance distribution across the tip end of the LCU. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Irradiance values calculated using conventional methods assume power uniformity within the beam and do not validly characterize the distribution of the irradiance delivered from dental light curing units. (J Esthet Restor Dent 22:86,103, 2010) [source] Accuracy of LED and Halogen Radiometers Using Different Light SourcesJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2006Howard W. Roberts dmd ABSTRACT Purpose:, To determine the accuracy of commercially available, handheld light-emitting diode (LED) and halogen-based radiometers using LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) curing lights with light guides of various diameters. Methods:, The irradiance of an LED curing light (L.E.Demetron 1, SDS/Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) and a QTH curing light (Optilux 501, SDS/Kerr) were measured using multiple units of an LED (Demetron L.E.D. Radiometer, SDS/Kerr) and a halogen radiometer (Demetron 100, SDS/Kerr) and compared with each other and to a laboratory-grade power meter (control). Measurements were made using five light guides with distal light guide diameters of 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12.5 mm. For each light guide, five readings were made with each of three radiometers of each radiometer type. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance/Tukey; ,=0.05. Results:, In general, both handheld radiometer types exhibited significantly different irradiance readings compared with the control meter. Additionally, readings between radiometer types were found to differ slightly, but were correlated. In general, the LED radiometer provided slightly lower irradiance readings than the halogen radiometer, irrespective of light source. With both types of handheld radiometers, the use of the larger-diameter light guides tended to overestimate the irradiance values as seen in the control, while smaller-diameter light guides tended to underestimate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The evaluated LED or halogen handheld radiometers may be used interchangeably to determine the irradiance of both LED and QTH visible-light-curing units. Measured differences between the two radiometer types were small and probably not clinically significant. However, the diameter of light guides may affect the accuracy of the radiometers, with larger-diameter light guides overestimating and smaller-diameter guides underestimating the irradiance value measured by the control instrument. [source] Irradiance Uniformity and Distribution from Dental Light Curing UnitsJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 2 2010FDS RCS (Edin), FRCD(c), RICHARD B. T. PRICE BDS ABSTRACT Problem:, The irradiance from dental light-curing units (LCUs) is commonly reported as a single number, but this number does not properly describe the light output. Purpose:, This study examined the irradiance uniformity and distribution from a variety of LCUs as well as the effect of different light guides. Materials and Methods:, Five LCUs representing quartz-tungsten-halogen, plasma arc, and light emitting diode units were evaluated. One LCU was evaluated using two different light guides (Standard or Turbo style). The total power emitted from each LCU was measured and the irradiance calculated using conventional methods (ICM). In addition, a beam profiler was used to determine the optically active emitting area, the mean irradiance (IBP), the irradiance distribution, and the Top Hat Factor (THF). Five replications were performed for each test and compared using analysis of variance with Fisher's PLSD tests at a pre-set alpha of 0.05. Results:, The spatial distribution of the irradiance from LCUs was neither universally symmetrical nor was it uniformly distributed across the tip end. Significant differences in both the emitted power and THF were found among the LCUs. The THF values ranged from a high of 0.74 ± 0.01 to a low of 0.32 ± 0.01. Changing from a standard to a turbo light guide increased the irradiance, but significantly reduced beam homogeneity, reduced the total emitted power, and reduced the optical tip area by 60%. Conclusions:, Using different light guides on the same LCU significantly affected the power output, irradiance values, and beam homogeneity. For all LCUs, irradiance values calculated using conventional methods (ICM) did not represent the irradiance distribution across the tip end of the LCU. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Irradiance values calculated using conventional methods assume power uniformity within the beam and do not validly characterize the distribution of the irradiance delivered from dental light curing units. (J Esthet Restor Dent 22:86,103, 2010) [source] Accuracy of LED and Halogen Radiometers Using Different Light SourcesJOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2006Howard W. Roberts dmd ABSTRACT Purpose:, To determine the accuracy of commercially available, handheld light-emitting diode (LED) and halogen-based radiometers using LED and quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) curing lights with light guides of various diameters. Methods:, The irradiance of an LED curing light (L.E.Demetron 1, SDS/Kerr, Orange, CA, USA) and a QTH curing light (Optilux 501, SDS/Kerr) were measured using multiple units of an LED (Demetron L.E.D. Radiometer, SDS/Kerr) and a halogen radiometer (Demetron 100, SDS/Kerr) and compared with each other and to a laboratory-grade power meter (control). Measurements were made using five light guides with distal light guide diameters of 4, 7, 8, 10, and 12.5 mm. For each light guide, five readings were made with each of three radiometers of each radiometer type. Data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance/Tukey; ,=0.05. Results:, In general, both handheld radiometer types exhibited significantly different irradiance readings compared with the control meter. Additionally, readings between radiometer types were found to differ slightly, but were correlated. In general, the LED radiometer provided slightly lower irradiance readings than the halogen radiometer, irrespective of light source. With both types of handheld radiometers, the use of the larger-diameter light guides tended to overestimate the irradiance values as seen in the control, while smaller-diameter light guides tended to underestimate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The evaluated LED or halogen handheld radiometers may be used interchangeably to determine the irradiance of both LED and QTH visible-light-curing units. Measured differences between the two radiometer types were small and probably not clinically significant. However, the diameter of light guides may affect the accuracy of the radiometers, with larger-diameter light guides overestimating and smaller-diameter guides underestimating the irradiance value measured by the control instrument. [source] Noninvasive blood flow imaging for real-time feedback during laser therapy of port wine stain birthmarksLASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, Issue 3 2008Yu-Chih Huang MS Abstract Background and Objectives During laser therapy of port wine stain (PWS) birthmarks, regions of persistent perfusion may exist. Immediate retreatment of such regions may improve PWS laser therapeutic outcome. To address this need, we propose use of laser speckle imaging (LSI) to provide real-time, quantitative feedback during laser surgery. Herein, we present in vitro and in vivo data collected with a clinic-based LSI instrument. Study Design/Materials and Methods Prior to clinical implementation, we first investigated three aspects of LSI deemed important for clinical imaging: (1) instrument depth of field (DOF); (2) effects of laser irradiance on speckle flow index (SFI) values; and (3) measurement repeatability. Clinical measurements were acquired from the lesions of PWS patients immediately prior to and after laser therapy at the Beckman Laser Institute. Results Our preclinical data suggest the following: (1) instrument DOF was ,1 cm; (2) quantitative flow characterization with LSI was practically unaffected at normalized irradiance values between 0.06 and 0.5; and (3) our LSI instrument was capable of highly reproducible SFI values. From our clinical measurements, we found that the relative difference between blood perfusion in PWS lesions and adjacent normal skin was highly variable. Based on SFI images, the perfusion of PWS skin is sometimes indistinguishable from that of adjacent normal skin. With laser therapy, we measured a global decrease in blood perfusion, and we frequently observed distinct regions of persistent perfusion. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the potential role of image-guided laser therapy of PWS birthmarks. LSI is a promising tool for noninvasive blood flow characterization during laser therapy due to its relative simplicity and low cost. Laser Surg. Med. 40:167,173, 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] Standard Ultraviolet Daylight for Nonextreme Exposure Conditions,PHOTOCHEMISTRY & PHOTOBIOLOGY, Issue 4 2005François J. Christiaens ABSTRACT The skin is exposed to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) from natural or artificial sources on a daily basis. The effects of chronic low dose exposure merit investigation, even when these effects are neither conspicuous nor clinically assessable. The purpose of the present study was to define a relative spectral UV irradiance that is representative of frequent nonextreme sun exposure conditions and therefore more appropriate for studies of the long-term and daily effects of solar UV on the skin. Solar spectral UV irradiance values were calculated for different dates and locations by using a radiative transfer model. The spectral irradiance values obtained when the solar elevation is lower than 45° were averaged. An important feature is the dUVA (320,400 nm) to dUVB (290,320 nm) irradiance values ratio, which was found to be 27.3 for the overall average. When the months corresponding to extreme irradiance values (low or high) were excluded from the calculations, the dUVA to dUVB ratio ranged from 27.2 to 27.5. The mean spectral irradiance of the model presented here represents environmental UV exposure conditions and can be used both as a standard to investigate the biological effects of a nonextreme UVR and to assess the effectiveness of products for daily skin protection. [source] UV Index Experimental Values During the Years 2000 and 2001 from the Spanish Broadband UV-B Radiometric Network,PHOTOCHEMISTRY & PHOTOBIOLOGY, Issue 2 2002José A. Martínez-Lozano ABSTRACT An analysis is made of experimental ultraviolet erythemal solar radiation data measured during the years 2000 and 2001 by the Spanish UV-B radiation evaluation and prediction network. This network consists of 16 Robertson,Berger type pyranometers for evaluating solar erythemal radiation and five Brewer spectroradiometers for evaluating the stratospheric ozone. On the basis of these data the Ultraviolet Index (UVI) was evaluated for the measuring stations that are located either in coastal regions or in the more densely populated regions inland on the Iberian Peninsula. It has been checked that in most cases the maximum irradiance values corresponded to solar noon, although there were exceptions that could be explained by cloudiness. The maximum experimental values of the UVI were around 9 during the summer, though frequently passing this value at the inland measurement stations. The annual accumulated dose of irradiation on a horizontal plane has also been studied, as well as the evolution through the year in units of energy, standard erythemal doses and minimum erythemal doses, according to different phototypes. [source] |