Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Investment Plan (investment + plan)
Selected AbstractsPower generation expansion planning with emission control: a nonlinear model and a GA-based heuristic approachINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, Issue 2 2006Jiraporn Sirikum Abstract This paper presents an application of genetic algorithms (GA) for solving the long-term power generation expansion planning (PGEP) problem, a highly constrained nonlinear discrete optimization problem. The problem is formulated into a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) program that determines the most economical investment plan for additional thermal power generating units over a planning horizon, subject to the requirements of power demands, power capacities, loss of load probability (LOLP) levels, locations, and environmental limitations. Computational results show that the GA-based heuristic method can solve the PGEP problem effectively and more efficiently at a significant saving in runtime, when compared with a commercial optimization package. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Investment with an arithmetic process and lagsMANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, Issue 5 2000Avner Bar-Ilan This paper presents an explicit solution of a simple investment problem with entry lags and when the underlying stochastic process is arithmetic. It is shown that, without abandonment, the optimal investment plan is independent of the length of the lag. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Corporate Cash Policy and How to Manage it with Stock RepurchasesJOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, Issue 3 2008Amy Dittmar At the end of 2004 total U.S. corporate cash holdings reached an all-time high of just under $2 trillion,an amount equal to roughly 15% of the total U.S. GDP. And during the past 25 years, average cash holdings have jumped from 10% to 23% of total corporate assets. But at the same time their levels of cash have risen, U.S. companies have paid out dramatically increasing amounts of cash to buy back shares. This article addresses the following questions: What accounts for the dramatic increase in the average level of corporate cash holdings since 1980? And why do some companies keep so much cash (with one fourth of U.S. firms holding cash amounting to at least 36% of total assets) while others have so little (with another quarter having less than 3%)? Why do companies pay out excess cash in the form of stock repurchases (rather than, say, dividends), and what explains the significant increase in repurchases (both in absolute terms and relative to dividends) over time? The author begins by arguing that cash reserves provide companies with a buffer against possible shortfalls in operating profits,one that, especially during periods of financial trouble, can be used to avoid financial distress or provide funding for promising projects that might otherwise have to be put off. Such buffers are particularly valuable in the case of smaller, riskier companies with lots of growth opportunities and limited access to capital markets. And the dramatic increase in corporate cash holdings between 1980 and the present can be attributed mainly to an increase in the risk of publicly traded companies,an increase in risk that reflects in part a general increase in competition, but also a notable change over time in the kinds of companies (smaller, newer, less profitable, non-dividend paying firms) that have chosen to go public. At the other end of the corporate spectrum are large, relatively mature companies with limited growth opportunities. Although such companies tend to produce considerable free cash flow, they also tend to retain relatively small amounts of cash (as a percentage of total assets), in part because of shareholder concern about the corporate "free cash flow problem",the well-documented tendency of such companies to destroy value through overpriced (often diversifying) acquisitions and other misguided attempts to pursue growth at the expense of profitability. For companies with highly predictable earnings and investment plans, dividends provide one means of addressing the free cash flow problem. But for companies with more variable earnings and less predictable reinvestment, open-market stock repurchases provide a more flexible means of distributing cash to shareholders. Unlike the corporate "commitment" implied by dividend payments, an open market stock repurchase program creates what amounts to an option but not an obligation to distribute funds. The value of such flexibility, which increases during periods of increased risk and uncertainty, explains much of the apparent substitution of repurchases for dividends in recent years. [source] Idiosyncratic and Common Shocks to Investment Decisions*THE ECONOMIC JOURNAL, Issue 482 2002Mark Schankerman We show how microeconomic data on investment plans can be used to study the structure of risk firms face. Revisions of investment plans form a martingale and reveal the underlying shocks driving investment. We decompose revisions in investment plans into micro, sector and aggregate shocks, and exploit stock market data to distinguish between structural (value-related) shocks and measurement error in investment revisions. Using panel data for US firms, we find that micro shocks are not the dominant source of risk in investment decisions, and that much of the observed micro variation is actually due to heterogeneity in firm-level responses to aggregate shocks. [source] | ||||||||||