Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Intravenous Rituximab (intravenous + rituximab)
Selected AbstractsRituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial,ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, Issue 4 2009Kathleen Hawker MD Objective Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody selectively depleting CD20+ B cells, has demonstrated efficacy in reducing disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated rituximab in adults with primary progressive MS (PPMS) through 96 weeks and safety through 122 weeks. Methods Using 2:1 randomization, 439 PPMS patients received two 1,000mg intravenous rituximab or placebo infusions every 24 weeks, through 96 weeks (4 courses). The primary endpoint was time to confirmed disease progression (CDP), a prespecified increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale sustained for 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline to week 96 in T2 lesion volume and total brain volume on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Results Differences in time to CDP between rituximab and placebo did not reach significance (96-week rates: 38.5% placebo, 30.2% rituximab; p = 0.14). From baseline to week 96, rituximab patients had less (p < 0.001) increase in T2 lesion volume; brain volume change was similar (p = 0.62) to placebo. Subgroup analysis showed time to CDP was delayed in rituximab-treated patients aged <51 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; p = 0.010), those with gadolinium-enhancing lesions (HR = 0.41; p = 0.007), and those aged <51 years with gadolinium-enhancing lesions (HR = 0.33; p = 0.009) compared with placebo. Adverse events were comparable between groups; 16.1% of rituximab and 13.6% of placebo patients reported serious events. Serious infections occurred in 4.5% of rituximab and <1.0% of placebo patients. Infusion-related events, predominantly mild to moderate, were more common with rituximab during the first course, and decreased to rates comparable to placebo on successive courses. Interpretation Although time to CDP between groups was not significant, overall subgroup analyses suggest selective B-cell depletion may affect disease progression in younger patients, particularly those with inflammatory lesions. Ann Neurol 2009;66:460,471 [source] Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti,tumor necrosis factor therapy: Results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating primary efficacy and safety at twenty-four weeksARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM, Issue 9 2006Stanley B. Cohen Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with rituximab plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to anti,tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies and to explore the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rituximab in this population. Methods We evaluated primary efficacy and safety at 24 weeks in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Efficacy of Rituximab in RA (REFLEX) Trial, a 2-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of rituximab therapy. Patients with active RA and an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF agents were randomized to receive intravenous rituximab (1 course, consisting of 2 infusions of 1,000 mg each) or placebo, both with background MTX. The primary efficacy end point was a response on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Secondary end points were responses on the ACR50 and ACR70 improvement criteria, the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria at 24 weeks. Additional end points included scores on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy,Fatigue (FACIT-F), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, as well as Genant-modified Sharp radiographic scores at 24 weeks. Results Patients assigned to placebo (n = 209) and rituximab (n = 311) had active, longstanding RA. At week 24, significantly more (P < 0.0001) rituximab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrated ACR20 (51% versus 18%), ACR50 (27% versus 5%), and ACR70 (12% versus 1%) responses and moderate-to-good EULAR responses (65% versus 22%). All ACR response parameters were significantly improved in rituximab-treated patients, who also had clinically meaningful improvements in fatigue, disability, and health-related quality of life (demonstrated by FACIT-F, HAQ DI, and SF-36 scores, respectively) and showed a trend toward less progression in radiographic end points. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD20+ B cells, but the mean immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgM, and IgA) remained within normal ranges. Most adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The rate of serious infections was 5.2 per 100 patient-years in the rituximab group and 3.7 per 100 patient-years in the placebo group. Conclusion At 24 weeks, a single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy provided significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity in patients with active, longstanding RA who had an inadequate response to 1 or more anti-TNF therapies. [source] Refractory subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus successfully treated with rituximabAUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 3 2009Violet Kieu ABSTRACT A 48-year-old woman presented with pruritic, scaly, annular plaques over her upper back and chest that were clinically, serologically and histologically characteristic of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). She failed to respond to conventional treatment, which included high-dose hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, prednisolone, chloroquine, acitretin, thalidomide, dapsone and azathioprine. Subsequently treated with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, she remained on adjuvant oral hydrochloroquine 600 mg daily and topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment as required. Clearing of annular plaques was noted 8 weeks after the initial course of rituximab. By 12 weeks there were no new lesions and only post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation remained. Both hyper- and hypopigmentation, which is more common, are consistent with SCLE lesion regression. Skin lesions recurred 11 months later; however, no further lesions occurred after re-introduction of rituximab therapy. The treatment was well tolerated. A maintenance regimen of rituximab, 375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks for 2 years, was commenced 3 months after completing the second course of treatment, with ongoing disease remission. Rituximab appears to have activity in refractory SCLE and clinical trials are required to further assess this potential therapy. [source] Rituximab in the adjuvant treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a prospective open-label pilot study in five patientsBRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 5 2007M.S.Y. Goh Summary Background, Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD20 antigen expressed on B lymphocytes. There are reports of its efficacy in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, including pemphigus. Objectives, Prospectively to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab as adjuvant treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Methods, Patients with PV were treated with intravenous rituximab (375 mg m,2) weekly for 4 weeks in this prospective open-label pilot study. Other concurrent immunosuppression was continued. Results, Of five patients, one achieved complete remission and was able to cease all medication, while two achieved clearance of clinical lesions but continued on systemic therapy. Two patients had progressive disease. Time to response was 2,8 months, with a 13- to 18-month response duration. Response was associated with reduction in serum antiepithelial antibodies. Two patients had significant infectious complications (one developed community-acquired pneumonia associated with delayed-onset neutropenia and the other developed cytomegalovirus infection). Conclusions, Rituximab has shown efficacy in the treatment of PV. Patients on multiple immunosuppressives should be closely monitored for infectious complications. [source] | ||||||||||