			Home About us Contact

Intradermal Tests (intradermal + test)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Alternative glucocorticoids for use in cases of adverse reaction to systemic glucocorticoids: a study on 10 patients

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2003
M.T. Ventura
Summary Background Reactions to systemically administered corticosteroids are rare, despite their widespread use. Objectives To identify alternative glucocorticoids for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to systemic glucocorticoids. Methods Ten patients were identified as having adverse reactions after the use of systemic corticosteroids. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests to hydrocortisone (HC) and methylprednisolone (MP), and intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone, were performed in all patients, and oral challenge tests to betamethasone (n=10) and deflazacort (n=6). Results Skin prick tests were negative in all patients, whereas intradermal tests to HC and MP were positive in eight; two patients showed only an isolated cutaneous sensitivity to MP. Intradermal tests to betamethasone and dexamethasone were negative, and oral challenge tests were negative in all patients. Conclusions Our results suggest the possibility of an IgE-mediated mechanism for allergic reactions to HC and MP, probably due, at least in part, to a steroid-glyoxal. We suggest that betamethasone and deflazacort could be reserved for emergency use in patients with adverse reactions to other corticosteroids. [source]

Contact urticaria from Emla® cream

CONTACT DERMATITIS, Issue 5-6 2004
J. Waton
We report the first case of immediate-type hypersensitivity caused by Emla® cream. A 55-year-old woman, after using Emla® cream, went on to develop urticaria. An open test was positive to Emla® cream. Patch tests and prick tests were performed with Emla® cream, the components of Emla® cream (lidocaine, prilocaine and castor oil) and other local anaesthetics. The patch test with lidocaine and the prick test with Emla® cream were both positive. An intradermal test and subcutaneous administration of 3 anaesthetics that had negative patch tests and prick tests were performed and well tolerated, allowing their use. In the literature, anaphylactic reactions to lidocaine injections, delayed-type hypersensitivity after lidocaine subcutaneous injections and contact dermatitis from Emla® cream have all been described. This first case of contact urticaria from Emla® cream was due to lidocaine and did not show any cross-reaction with other local anaesthetics. [source]

An anaphylactic reaction to transdermal delivered fentanyl

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2009
P. DEWACHTER
Immediate allergic hypersensitivity reactions with fentanyl are rarely reported. We diagnosed a presumably IgE-mediated allergic hypersensitivity reaction comprising generalized erythema and bronchospasm 4 h after the first-time application of transdermal fentanyl. Prick test remained negative with fentanyl whereas an intradermal test (IDT) with fentanyl was positive (dilution 10,2). Cross-reactivity was found with sufentanil but not with remifentanil. The diagnosis was supported by the clinical history and a positive IDT with fentanyl. This case report confirms the need for a systematic allergological investigation in case of immediate hypersensitivity reactions for all drugs and all modes of administration. [source]

Multiple fixed drug eruption due to intradermal test with metamizole

ALLERGY, Issue 6 2007
C. Vidal
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

The investigation of bronchospasm during induction of anaesthesia

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 8 2009
M. M. FISHER
Background: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether anaesthetic induction-related anaphylactic bronchospasm could be distinguished from other types of bronchospasm by clinical features and response to treatment. Such features could then be used to identify a group of patients in whom skin testing is indicated. Methods: We retrospectively studied data from 183 patients referred to an anaesthetic allergy clinic because of bronchospasm during induction. For the analysis, the patients were divided into two groups depending on whether there was evidence suggesting immunological anaphylaxis. Results: When the patients in whom intradermal tests were positive were compared with those in whom intradermal tests were negative, the skin test-positive patients had significantly more severe reactions, and they were more commonly associated with other clinical signs. Mast cell tryptase (MCT) was an excellent discriminator between reactions likely to be allergic and those unlikely to be allergic. Conclusions: Anaphylactic bronchospasm related to induction of anaesthesia is more likely to be severe than bronchospasm due to non-immune causes. An allergic cause is more likely if there are associated features of anaphylaxis (skin changes, hypotension, angioedema) or elevated MCT. Patients with any of these features should undergo immuno-allergolical investigation. [source]

Necrolytic acral erythema without hepatitis C infection

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Yu-Hung Wu
Necrolytic acral erythema is a newly described entity characterized by sharply demarcated scaly plaques on the dorsum of the hands and feet. More than 30 patients have been reported since 1996, all of whom had anti-hepatitis C virus antibody. A 32-year-old Taiwanese woman had been diagnosed with and treated for systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis about 10 years earlier. Soon thereafter, she noted several well-demarcated keratotic plaques with erythematous borders on her feet, with sparing of the soles. Histopathology showed diffuse parakeratosis with a neutrophil infiltrate, hypogranulosis, pale upper keratinocytes, scattered and grouped dyskeratotic cells, psoriasiform hyperplasia and a mild lymphocytic infiltrate in the upper dermis. The diagnosis was made after three biopsies. The lesions regularly worsened just before and during menstruation, but patch and intradermal tests for progesterone and estrogen were negative. There was no evidence of either hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection. The lesions did not respond to treatment with zinc. The rash regressed spontaneously when corticosteroids were stopped and recurred when they were restarted, finally resolving completely after she was treated with high-dose pulse steroids for her lupus. [source]

Skin testing in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media , a European multicenter study

ALLERGY, Issue 2 2009
K. Brockow
Background:, Iodinated contrast media cause both immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of skin tests in patients who have experienced such reactions. Methods:, Skin prick, intradermal and patch tests with a series of contrast media were conducted in 220 patients with either immediate or nonimmediate reaction. Positive skin tests were defined according to internationally accepted guidelines. Seventy-one never-exposed subjects and 11 subjects who had tolerated contrast medium exposure, served as negative controls. Results:, Skin test specificity was 96,100%. For tests conducted within the time period from 2 to 6 months after the reaction, up to 50% of immediate reactors and up to 47% of nonimmediate reactors were skin test positive. For immediate reactors, the intradermal tests were the most sensitive, whereas delayed intradermal tests in combination with patch tests were needed for optimal sensitivity in nonimmediate reactors. Contrast medium cross-reactivity was more common in the nonimmediate than in the immediate group. Interestingly, 49% of immediate and 52% of nonimmediate symptoms occurred in previously unexposed patients. Many of these patients were skin test positive, indicating that they were already sensitized at the time of first contrast medium exposure. Conclusions:, These data suggest that at least 50% of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media are caused by an immunological mechanism. Skin testing appears to be a useful tool for diagnosis of contrast medium allergy and may play an important role in selection of a safe product in previous reactors. [source]

Immunological response to mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in cancer patients: a four-case series

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, Issue 3 2009
Nilo Esvalter Gardin
Abstract European mistletoe (Viscum album) has been used in complementary cancer treatment, but little is known concerning its effects on immunological parameters, although there is evidence that Viscum may stimulate the immune system. In this study, a trial was conducted with cancer patients to determine whether Viscum album extracts could improve the results of immune tests. These were: white blood cell count (leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes), CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes, intradermal tests of delayed hypersensitivity (candidin, trichophytin, purified protein derivative-PPD), complement C3 and C4, and immunoglobulin A, G and M. Four patients received seven doses of subcutaneous Viscum album 20 mg, twice weekly. Immunological tests were carried out before and after treatment, and an increase in several parameters of humoral and cellular immunity were shown. Apart from reactions around the injection sites, treatment was well tolerated and all patients benefited from it. These results suggest that Viscum album can enhance humoral and cellular immune responses in cancer patients, but further studies attesting to the possible clinical impact of these immunological effects are necessary. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]