Home About us Contact | |||
Intra-abdominal Pressure (intra-abdominal + pressure)
Selected AbstractsDETERMINING NORMAL VALUES FOR INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSUREANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2006Joanne J. L. Chionh Background: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements can be used for the early detection and management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. IAP values are widely thought to be atmospheric or subatmospheric. However, there are no reports that describe normal IAP values using urinary bladder pressure measurements in patients not suspected of having a raised IAP level. This study sought to determine these normal values to aid our interpretation of IAP measurements in post-surgical patients or patients with suspected increased IAP. Methods: Urinary bladder pressure measurements were carried out in 40 men and 18 women awake medical or non-abdominal surgery inpatients with existing indwelling catheters. Measurements were made in the supine, 30° and 45° sitting positions. Comparisons were carried out to determine the effects on urinary bladder pressure of body position, sex and a suspected diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Results: Median values for IAP were higher if measured in a more upright position (P < 0.0001). Median values were supine, 9.5 cmH2O (range, 1,18 cmH2O); 30° upright, 11.5 cmH2O (range, 3,19 cmH2O); and at 45° upright, 14.0 cmH2O (range, 4,22 cmH2O). Measurements recorded were neither atmospheric nor subatmospheric. IAP was higher in men compared with women in the supine and 30° positions (P < 0.05) but not in the 45° position (P = 0.083). There was no significant difference between patients with and without suspected benign prostatic hypertrophy. Conclusions: Normal IAP using urinary bladder pressure in awake patients are above atmospheric pressure. As a patient is moved from the supine into the upright position, IAP measurements increase. [source] Effects of intra-abdominal CO2 -insufflation on normal and impaired myocardial function: an experimental studyACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 6 2003C. A. Greim Background:, Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) elevation during CO2 -pneumoperitoneum increases cardiac afterload and may enhance dysfunction of the already compromized heart. This study focused on the effects of acute IAP increases on left and right ventricular loadings and contractility in the heart with impaired global function. Methods:, Impairment of myocardial function (IMF) was pharmacologically induced in 16 pigs by administration of halothane and propranolol, while baseline arterial pressure was maintained by intravenous phenylephrine. Intra-abdominal pressure was gradually increased by 10 mmHg up to 30 mmHg in the supine position (IMF group 1, n = 8) or in a head-down tilted position (IMF group 2, n = 8). In two control groups with normal myocardial function, IAP was also increased in the supine position or the head-down tilted position. Cardiac function in all groups was assessed by epicardial echocardiography, intraventricular pressure measurements and pulmonary artery catheterization. Results:, The increase in IAP was accompanied by a transient rise in LV end-systolic wall stress and reduced cardiac output significantly by 16,24% in all groups. In the IMF groups, LV end-diastolic transmural pressure increased by 34,60% to peak values of 24 mmHg, while cross-sectional LV end-diastolic areas remained unchanged. Increases in right ventricular end-diastolic volume and decreases in right ventricular ejection fraction as well as in cardiac output were most pronounced at IAP 20 mmHg and significantly stronger in both IMF groups than in the control groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion:, Following the acute elevation of IAP, the right ventricular volume load shifted more extensively in the IMF groups than in the animals with normal myocardial function. Myocardial function in the impaired heart may worsen during IAP elevation due to right ventricular load alterations rather than a LV afterload increase. [source] DETERMINING NORMAL VALUES FOR INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSUREANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 12 2006Joanne J. L. Chionh Background: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurements can be used for the early detection and management of the abdominal compartment syndrome. IAP values are widely thought to be atmospheric or subatmospheric. However, there are no reports that describe normal IAP values using urinary bladder pressure measurements in patients not suspected of having a raised IAP level. This study sought to determine these normal values to aid our interpretation of IAP measurements in post-surgical patients or patients with suspected increased IAP. Methods: Urinary bladder pressure measurements were carried out in 40 men and 18 women awake medical or non-abdominal surgery inpatients with existing indwelling catheters. Measurements were made in the supine, 30° and 45° sitting positions. Comparisons were carried out to determine the effects on urinary bladder pressure of body position, sex and a suspected diagnosis of benign prostatic hypertrophy. Results: Median values for IAP were higher if measured in a more upright position (P < 0.0001). Median values were supine, 9.5 cmH2O (range, 1,18 cmH2O); 30° upright, 11.5 cmH2O (range, 3,19 cmH2O); and at 45° upright, 14.0 cmH2O (range, 4,22 cmH2O). Measurements recorded were neither atmospheric nor subatmospheric. IAP was higher in men compared with women in the supine and 30° positions (P < 0.05) but not in the 45° position (P = 0.083). There was no significant difference between patients with and without suspected benign prostatic hypertrophy. Conclusions: Normal IAP using urinary bladder pressure in awake patients are above atmospheric pressure. As a patient is moved from the supine into the upright position, IAP measurements increase. [source] Prospective study of the incidence and outcome of intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndromeBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 5 2002Dr J. J. Hong Background: Intra-abdominal hypertension has been recognized as a source of morbidity and mortality in the traumatized patient following laparotomy. Multiple organ dysfunction attributable to intra-abdominal hypertension has been called the abdominal compartment syndrome. The epidemiology and characteristics of these processes remain poorly defined. Methods: Intra-abdominal pressure was measured prospectively in all patients admitted to a trauma intensive care unit over 9 months. Data were gathered on all patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Results: Some 706 patients were evaluated. Fifteen (2 per cent) of 706 patients had intra-abdominal hypertension. Six of the 15 patients with intra-abdominal hypertension had abdominal compartment syndrome. Half of the patients with abdominal compartment syndrome died, as did two of the remaining nine patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome had a mean intra-abdominal pressure of 42 mmHg compared with 26 mmHg in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension only (P < 0·05). Conclusion: The incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome was 2 and 1 per cent respectively. Intra-abdominal hypertension did not necessarily lead to abdominal compartment syndrome, and often resolved without clinical sequelae. Abdominal compartment syndrome did not occur in the absence of earlier laparotomy. Abdominal compartment syndrome was associated with a marked increase in intra-abdominal pressure (above 40 mmHg). © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Increasing intra-abdominal pressure increases pressure, volume, and wall tension in esophageal varicesHEPATOLOGY, Issue 4 2002Angels Escorsell Many daily activities cause acute elevations of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). In portal hypertensive cirrhotic patients, increased IAP increases absolute portal pressure and azygos blood flow, suggesting that it may have detrimental consequences at the esophageal varices. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of increased IAP on variceal pressure, size, and wall tension. Endosonography and a noninvasive endoscopic pressure gauge were used to measure variceal pressure, radius, wall tension, and volume in baseline conditions and after increasing IAP by 10 mm Hg using an inflatable girdle in 14 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices. Increasing IAP markedly increased variceal pressure (from 13.3 ± 4.2 to 17.4 ± 4.6 mm Hg; P = .0001) and radius (from 2.9 ± 1.0 to 3.9 ± 1.1 mm; P = .0001). Consequently, wall tension dramatically increased (from 38.7 ± 13.6 to 65.9 ± 23.8 mm Hg · mm, +78%; P = .0001). Variceal volume increased significantly from 1,264 ± 759 to 2,025 ± 1,129 mm3 (P = .0001). In conclusion, in portal hypertensive cirrhotic patients, increases in IAP have deleterious effects on variceal hemodynamics, markedly increasing the volume, pressure, and wall tension of the varices. Increases in IAP may contribute to the progressive dilatation that precedes the rupture of the varices in portal hypertension. [source] Exercise-induced cholangitis and pancreatitisHPB, Issue 2 2005JOHN G. TOUZIOS Abstract Background. Cholangitis requires bactibilia and increased biliary pressure. Pancreatitis may be initiated by elevated intraductal pressure. The sphincter of Oddi regulates pancreatobiliary pressures and prevents reflux of duodenal contents. However, following biliary bypass or pancreatoduodenectomy, increased intra-abdominal pressure may be transmitted into the bile ducts and/or pancreas. The aim of this analysis is to document that cholangitis or pancreatitis may be exercise-induced. Methods. The records of patients with one or more episodes of cholangitis or pancreatitis precipitated by exercise and documented to have patent hepatico- or pancreatojejunostomies were reviewed. Cholangitis was defined as fever with or without abdominal pain and transiently abnormal liver tests. Pancreatitis was defined as abdominal pain, with transient elevation of serum amylase and documented by peripancreatic inflammation on computerized tomography. Results. Twelve episodes of cholangitis occurred in six patients who had undergone hepaticojejunostomy for biliary stricture (N=3), Type I choledochal cyst (N=2), or pancreatoduodenectomy for renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreas (N=1). Four episodes of pancreatitis occurred in two patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma or chronic pancreatitis. Workup and subsequent follow-up for a median of 21 months have not documented anastomotic stricture. Each episode of cholangitis and pancreatitis was brought on by heavy exercise and avoidance of this level of exercise has prevented future episodes. Conclusion. Following biliary bypass or pancreatoduodenectomy, significant exercise may increase intra-abdominal pressure and cause cholangitis or pancreatitis. Awareness of this entity and behavior modification will avoid unnecessary procedures in these patients. [source] Power Doppler sonography of the kidney: Effect of Valsalva's maneuverJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, Issue 7 2001Ryuichi Takano MD Abstract Purpose It has been reported that an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) above 15 mm Hg may cause oliguria and that an IAP above 25 mm Hg may cause anuria. Because Valsalva's maneuver yields an IAP exceeding 180 mm Hg, it is presumed to affect renal perfusion. We evaluated the ability of power Doppler sonography to depict the changes in renal blood flow during Valsalva's maneuver. Methods Seven healthy men aged 21,24 years and 1 50-year-old man with massive ascites participated in the study. With each healthy subject lying in a supine position, longitudinal power Doppler sonograms of the kidney were obtained and analyzed semiquantitatively during Valsalva's maneuver. Also, in the patient with massive ascites, power Doppler sonography was performed before and after paracentesis. Results Along with an increase in IAP, monitored as expiratory pressure during Valsalva's maneuver, power Doppler signals decreased as indicated by both visual impression and computer scores. In the patient with massive ascites, signal intensity increased after paracentesis. Conclusions Our results demonstrated that an increase in IAP within the physiologic range affects renal perfusion and that power Doppler sonography depicts semiquantitatively the change in renal blood flow. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Ultra- 29:384,388, 2001. [source] Renal failure and abdominal hypertension after liver transplantation: Determination of critical intra-abdominal pressureLIVER TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 12 2002Gianni Biancofiore MD There is growing interest in measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in postsurgical and critically ill patients because increased pressure can impair various organs and functions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different IAP levels on the postoperative renal function of subjects undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. IAP was measured every 8 hours with the urinary bladder pressure method for at least 72 hours after surgery. At the end of the study, the patients were classified on the basis of their IAP values: , 18 mm Hg (group A), 19 to 24 mm Hg (group B), , 25 mm Hg (group C). The three groups were compared in terms of the incidence of acute renal failure (defined as blood creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL or an increase in the same of > 1.1 mg/dL within 72 hours of surgery), hourly diuresis, blood creatinine, the filtration gradient, hemodynamic variations, and outcome. The incidence of renal failure was higher among the subjects in group C (P < .05 versus group A and < .01 versus group B), who also had higher creatinine levels (P < .01), a greater need for diuretics (P < .01) and a worse outcome (P < .05). Receiver Operator Characteristic curve analysis showed that an abdominal pressure of 25 mm Hg had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio for renal failure. An intra-abdominal pressure of , 25 mm Hg is an important risk factor for renal failure in subjects undergoing liver transplant. [source] Pneumoperitoneum versus abdominal wall lift: effects on central haemodynamics and intrathoracic pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomyACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 7 2003L. Andersson Background:, It has been shown repeatedly that laparoscopic cholecystectomy using pneumoperitoneum (CO2 insufflation) may be associated with increased cardiac filling pressures and an increase in blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance. In the present study, the effects on the central circulation during abdominal wall lift (a gasless method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were compared with those during pneumoperitoneum. The study was also aimed at elucidating the relationships between the central filling pressures and the intrathoracic pressure. Methods:, Twenty patients (ASA I), scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were randomised into two groups, pneumoperitoneum or abdominal wall lift. Measurements were made by arterial and pulmonary arterial catheterization before and during pneumoperitoneum or abdominal wall lift with the patient in the horizontal position. Measurements were repeated after head-up tilting the patients as well as after 30 min head-up tilt. The intrathoracic pressure was monitored in the horizontal position before and during intervention using an intraesophageal balloon. Results:, After pneumoperitoneum or abdominal wall lifting there were significant differences between the two groups regarding MAP, SVR, CVP, CI, and SV. Analogous to previous studies, in the pneumoperitoneum group CVP, PCWP, MPAP, and MAP as well as SVR were increased after CO2 insufflation (P < 0.01), while CI and SV were not affected. In contrast, in the abdominal wall lift group, CI and SV were significantly increased (P < 0.01), as was MAP (P < 0.01), while CVP, PCWP, MPAP, and SVR were not significantly affected. There was a significant difference in intraesophageal pressure between the two groups. In the pneumoperitoneum group, the intraesophageal pressure was increased by insufflation (P < 0.01) while, in the abdominal wall lift group, it was unaffected. In the pneumoperitoneum group the mean increases in cardiac filling pressures were of the same magnitude as the mean increase in the intraesophageal pressure. Conclusions:, In healthy patients, abdominal wall lift increased cardiac index while pneumoperitoneum did not. Cardiac filling pressures and systemic vascular resistance were increased by pneumoperitoneum but unaffected by abdominal wall lift. The recorded elevated cardiac filling pressures during pneumoperitoneum may be only a reflection of the increased intra-abdominal pressure. [source] Novel intra-operative pulse oximetry monitoring for gastroschisis: a noninvasive monitor of intra-abdominal pressurePEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, Issue 4 2008Caron M. Hong No abstract is available for this article. [source] ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME AFTER RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 8 2008John Y. S. Choi Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is an increasingly recognized syndrome of intra-abdominal hypertension and generalized physiological dysfunction in critically ill patients. Patients suffering a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) are at risk of developing ACS. The objective of the study was to compare the current views on the importance, prevalence and management of ACS after rAAA among Australian vascular surgeons and intensivists. A questionnaire was mailed to 116 registered vascular fellows from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and 314 registered fellows of the Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine. Data were collected on the prevalence and importance of ACS after rAAA and whether prophylactic measures were or should be taken to prevent ACS. Hypothetical clinical scenarios representing a range of ACS after rAAA were also presented. The responses were compared using ,2 -test and t -test. Sixty-seven per cent (78 of 116) of surgeons and 39% (122 of 314) of intensivists responded. Both groups estimated the prevalence of ACS after rAAA as between 10 and 30% and considered it an important entity. Only 30% of surgeons and 50% of intensivists suggested routine intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring. In patients with borderline IAP (18 mmHg), both groups believed that surgical intervention was unnecessary. Intensivists were more inclined to suggest surgical intervention for clinically deteriorating patients with an increased IAP (30 mmHg) compared with surgeons. Forty-three per cent of intensivists and 17% of surgeons suggested prophylactic (leaving the abdomen open) measures to prevent ACS in high-risk patients. Surgeons and intensivists have similar views on the prevalence and clinical importance of ACS after rAAA. Intensivists more frequently monitored IAP and suggested both early prophylactic and therapeutic intervention for ACS based on physiological and IAP findings. [source] Effects of pneumoperitoneum with or without colostomy on rat colonic anastomotic healingANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 3 2004Hedef Özgün Background: Elevated intra-abdominal pressure and colostomy have adverse effects on colonic anastomoses. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of laparoscopic colon surgery with and without diverting colostomy on healing of colonic anastomoses in an experimental model. Methods: Thirty-six male rats were divided into three equal groups: group 1, control (colonic anastomosis and anaesthesia for 180 min only); group 2, 180 min pneumoperitoneum and colonic anastomosis; and group 3, similar to group 2 with a proximal colostomy. On day 7, bursting pressures, tissue hydroxyproline and nitric oxide concentrations and histopathological inflammation scores were determined and compared. Results: Mean bursting pressures were higher in the control group than the two pneumoperitoneum groups (P = 0.0003). Mean tissue hydroxyproline concentrations showed no difference (P > 0.05). Mean tissue nitric oxide concentrations were significantly increased in the control group (P = 0.0013). Histopathological scores demonstrated increased inflammatory response in group 3 compared to the controls (P = 0.0009). Conclusion: Pneumoperitoneum delays collagen maturation and impairs anastomotic strength in the colon. Following pneumoperitoneum, performance of a diverting loop colostomy to protect the anastomosis will not have additional detrimental effects on anastomotic healing. [source] Patient-adjusted intermittent electrostimulation for treating stress and urge urinary incontinenceBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 1 2004Israel Nissenkorn OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and efficacy of pelvic floor muscle electrostimulation (ES) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or mixed UI (MUI, urge and interstitial cystitis), using a new portable electrostimulator (Miniaturo, Biocontrol Medical Inc., Yehud, Israel) which delivers different forms of stimulation for treating these two conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS For SUI the stimulator is activated on demand only by a sudden increase in intra-abdominal pressure; for frequency and urgency a milder, continuous ES is used. The intensity of ES can be adjusted according to the patient's sensation. Women were enrolled into the study after satisfying inclusion criteria and pad testing; 23 participated in two study groups, i.e. 16 with SUI and seven with MUI (severe frequency, urgency and urge, and mild SUI). The pelvic floor muscles were stimulated through an electrode inserted paraurethrally, positioned similarly in all patients. In patients with SUI and MUI a pressure sensor was also inserted into the rectum, to record intra-abdominal pressure. Stimulation was applied for 1,4 h in patients with SUI and for 6 h in those with MUI. The evaluation was based on urinary symptoms (frequency, urgency, leaking episodes), quality-of-life questionnaires and pad tests at baseline and during stimulation. RESULTS All patients in both groups improved significantly; of the 16 patients with SUI, nine were completely dry during ES, and the remaining seven had a reduced mean pad weight, from 23 to 6 g (74%). There was no significant reduction in pad weight after sham ES (17 g before vs 24.2 g after). In four patients with SUI who continued ES for 4 h the mean cumulative stimulation time (calculated from the stimulator memory) was 3 min (1.3% of 4 h). In the MUI group there were no leakage episodes during ES and significant reductions in voiding variables (Student's t -test) in all. The mean (Sd) voiding frequency, urinary urgency and leaking episodes decreased from 8.1 (4.2) to 1.9 (1.5), 6.4 (2.3) to 0.7 (1.3) and 2.1 (0.7) to 0.7 (0.5) (all P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The concept of this ES system for treating UI is promising; this study supports the efficacy of this form of ES but no conclusions about clinical efficacy are possible at this stage, and thus a trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this implantable device is ongoing. [source] Colonic ischaemia and intra-abdominal hypertension following open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysmBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 6 2009K. Djavani Background: The aim was to investigate the association between colonic ischaemia and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Methods: Sigmoid colon perfusion was monitored with an intramucosal pH (pHi) tonometer. Patients with a pHi of 7·1 or less were treated for suspected hypovolaemia with intravenous colloids and colonoscopy. IAP was measured every 4 h. Patients with an IAP of 20 mmHg or more had neuromuscular blockade, relaparotomy or both. Results: A total of 52 consecutive patients had open rAAA repair; 30-day mortality was 27 per cent. Eight patients died shortly after surgery. Fifteen were not monitored for practical reasons; mortality in this group was 33 per cent. IAP and pHi were measured throughout the stay in intensive care in the remaining 29 patients. Monitoring led to volume resuscitation in 25 patients, neuromuscular blockade in 16, colonoscopy in 19 and relaparotomy in two. One patient died in this group. Twenty-three of 29 patients had a pHi of 7·1 or less, of whom 15 had a pHi of 6·9 or less. Sixteen had an IAP of 20 mmHg or more, of whom ten also had a pHi below 6·90. Peak IAP values correlated with the simultaneously measured pHi (r = ,0·39, P = 0·003). Conclusion: Raised IAP is an important mechanism behind colonic hypoperfusion after rAAA repair. Monitoring IAP and timely intervention may improve outcome. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Prospective study of the incidence and outcome of intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndromeBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 5 2002Dr J. J. Hong Background: Intra-abdominal hypertension has been recognized as a source of morbidity and mortality in the traumatized patient following laparotomy. Multiple organ dysfunction attributable to intra-abdominal hypertension has been called the abdominal compartment syndrome. The epidemiology and characteristics of these processes remain poorly defined. Methods: Intra-abdominal pressure was measured prospectively in all patients admitted to a trauma intensive care unit over 9 months. Data were gathered on all patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Results: Some 706 patients were evaluated. Fifteen (2 per cent) of 706 patients had intra-abdominal hypertension. Six of the 15 patients with intra-abdominal hypertension had abdominal compartment syndrome. Half of the patients with abdominal compartment syndrome died, as did two of the remaining nine patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Patients with abdominal compartment syndrome had a mean intra-abdominal pressure of 42 mmHg compared with 26 mmHg in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension only (P < 0·05). Conclusion: The incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome was 2 and 1 per cent respectively. Intra-abdominal hypertension did not necessarily lead to abdominal compartment syndrome, and often resolved without clinical sequelae. Abdominal compartment syndrome did not occur in the absence of earlier laparotomy. Abdominal compartment syndrome was associated with a marked increase in intra-abdominal pressure (above 40 mmHg). © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] |