Home About us Contact | |||
Interstitial Duplication (interstitial + duplication)
Selected AbstractsDuplication of chromosome 2 in association with ventriculomegaly , a case reportPRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, Issue 13 2001W. L. Martin Abstract This is a case report of the prenatal diagnosis of a de novo interstitial duplication of chromosome 2 (46,XX,dup(2)(p13p21) de novo) with an associated phenotypic abnormality. This chromosomal duplication is rare, only one has previously been described prenatally. Postnatal reports of similar duplications in this region have described associated dysmorphic features and significant neurodevelopmental delay. In our case, the only ultrasound finding was moderately severe ventriculomegaly. At post-mortem, ventriculomegaly was confirmed and there was associated macrocephaly (head circumference above the 97th centile) with no dysmorphic features seen. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] An adult female patient with ring chromosome 21: behavioural phenotype and results of high-resolution molecular characterisationACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA, Issue 4 2010Willem M.A. Verhoeven Verhoeven WMA, Bon BV, Egger JIM, Hoischen A, Doelman JC. An adult female patient with ring chromosome 21: behavioural phenotype and results of high-resolution molecular characterisation. Objective: A female adult patient with mild to moderate mental retardation and minor dysmorphisms was referred for neuropsychiatric examination because of psychotic and autistic symptoms and impulsive behaviours. Methods: Standardized neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological assessment as well as detailed somatic and neurological examination was performed. For genetic analysis, karyotyping, whole genome array analysis, and high-resolution detailed analysis of chromosome 21 were carried through. Results: Karyotyping showed a de novo ring chromosome 21: 46,XX,der(21)r(21)(p11q22.3). High-resolution array analysis demonstrated a complex aberration consisting of an interstitial duplication in 21q21.1, an interstitial deletion in 21q22.2q22.3, an interstitial deletion in 21q22.3 and a terminal deletion of 21q22.3. Apart from mild dysmorphisms, visual and auditory impairments, and infertility, no somatic or neurological abnormalities were found. A formal psychiatric diagnosis could not be established. The behavioural problems and the supposed psychiatric symptoms could be related to her disharmonic social cognitive profile. The behaviour normalized after the patient returned to a stable and structured living environment. Conclusion: High-resolution micro-array analysis techniques are essential to substantiate the genotype,phenotype correlation in patients with r(21) and other genetic disorders. Moreover, the results of this study stress the importance of the recognition of alexithymia as a potential cause for behavioural problems and psychiatric symptoms in patients with mental retardation in general. [source] A new genomic duplication syndrome complementary to the velocardiofacial (22q11 deletion) syndromeCLINICAL GENETICS, Issue 5 2004SJ Hassed Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis can reveal undetected chromosomal rearrangements. We report a patient with cleft palate, hydronephrosis, and minor dysmorphic features, including low-set posteriorly rotated ears, down-slanting palpebral fissures, mandibular micrognathia, and brachymesophalangia. Routine chromosome analysis identified no abnormality of chromosome 22; FISH analysis with the TUPLE1 probe disclosed an interstitial duplication of 22q11.2. FISH analysis did not reveal the duplication on the initial testing of metaphase chromosomes, although, on review, the area was brighter on one chromosome in each metaphase spread. FISH analysis of interphase cells showed three TUPLE1-probe sites with two chromosome-specific identification probes in each cell. Family history showed two older full siblings, a brother with behavior problems, oppositional defiant disorder, and learning problems and a sister with hydronephrosis and mild delays. The father and both siblings had similar facial features, and all three had the same interstitial duplication of the TUPLE1 probe. This family illustrates the novel complementary duplication syndrome of the velocardiofacial syndrome, which adds it to the expanding list of genomic deletion/duplication syndromes. The laboratory results further show the utility and need for careful analysis of interphase cells even in samples where good quality metaphases are available. [source] Rapid detection of submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements in children with multiple congenital anomalies using high density oligonucleotide arrays,,HUMAN MUTATION, Issue 5 2006Jeffrey E. Ming Abstract Chromosomal rearrangements such as microdeletions and interstitial duplications are the underlying cause of many human genetic disorders. These disorders can manifest in the form of multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), which are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children. The major limitations of cytogenetic tests currently used for the detection of such chromosomal rearrangements are low resolution and limited coverage of the genome. Thus, it is likely that children with MCA may have submicroscopic chromosomal rearrangements that are not detectable by current techniques. We report the use of a commercially available, oligonucleotide-based microarray for genome-wide analysis of copy number alterations. First, we validated the microarray in patients with known chromosomal rearrangements. Next, we identified previously undetected, de novo chromosomal deletions in patients with MCA who have had a normal high-resolution karyotype and subtelomeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. These findings indicate that high-density, oligonucleotide-based microarrays can be successfully used as tools for the detection of chromosomal rearrangement in clinical samples. Their higher resolution and commercial availability make this type of microarray highly desirable for application in the diagnosis of patients with multiple congenital defects. Hum Mutat 27(5), 467,473, 2006. © Published 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source] |