Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
International Collaborative Study (international + collaborative_study)
Selected AbstractsOral status indicators DMFT and FS-T: reflections on index selectionEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, Issue 3 2001Annemarie A. Schuller Oral status in a population has traditionally been described by the DMFT index (decayed, filled, and missing teeth). There seems to be contradicting and confusing evidence in the literature with regard to the usefulness of different indices. Limitations of the DMFT are recognised, and attempts have been made to develop other indices. Two indices, DMFT and FS-T (filled and sound teeth) have been selected for analysis in the present paper. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between DMFT and FS-T in different populations, and to show consequences of choice of index exemplified in analytical analysis. Data stem from the Trøndelag-83 and -94 studies that were follow-up studies of the Norwegian portion of the 1973 International Collaborative Study. Sunflower scatter plots and regression analyses were used to describe the variation in DMFT and FS-T in different populations. DMFT was more suitable for describing variation in populations with low levels of disease than FS-T, while FS-T was more suitable for describing variation in populations with high levels of disease. It may be concluded that both DMFT and FS-T should be presented when describing oral status in a population. However, choice of index depends first of all on the purpose of the investigation. If there are theoretical reasons to prefer one index instead of the other, the superiority of the alternative index in terms of variation must be disregarded. [source] Complications of craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the skull base: Report of an International Collaborative Study,HEAD & NECK: JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES & SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, Issue 6 2005Ian Ganly MD Abstract Background. Advances in imaging, surgical technique, and perioperative care have made craniofacial resection (CFR) an effective and safe option for treating malignant tumors involving the skull base. The procedure does, however, have complications. Because of the relative rarity of these tumors, most existing data on postoperative complications come from individual reports of relatively small series of patients. This international collaborative report examines a large cohort of patients accumulated from multiple institutions with the aim of identifying patient-related and tumor-related predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality and set a benchmark for future studies. Methods. One thousand one hundred ninety-three patients from 17 institutions were analyzed for postoperative mortality and complications. Postoperative complications were classified into systemic, wound, central nervous system (CNS), and orbit. Statistical analyses were carried out in relation to patient characteristics, extent of disease, prior radiation treatment, and type of reconstruction to determine factors that predicted mortality or complications. Results. Postoperative mortality occurred in 56 patients (4.7%). The presence of medical comorbidity was the only independent predictor of mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 433 patients (36.3%). Wound complications occurred in 237 (19.8%), CNS-related complications in 193 (16.2%), orbital complications in 20 (1.7%), and systemic complications in 57 (4.8%) patients. Medical comorbidity, prior radiation therapy, and the extent of intracranial tumour involvement were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Conclusions. CFR is a safe surgical treatment for malignant tumors of the skull base, with an overall mortality of 4.7% and complication rate of 36.3%. The impact of medical comorbidity and intracranial tumor extent should be carefully considered when planning therapy for patients whose tumors are amenable to CFR. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck27: XXX,XXX, 2005 [source] Demonstrating Successful Aging Using the International Collaborative Study for Oral Health OutcomesJOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, Issue 4 2000Kathryn A. Atchison DDS Abstract As the lifespan increases and people are faced with 15 to 20 years of "old age," we ask what one considers successful aging with respect to oral health. We propose a comprehensive combination of outcome variables, maintenance of teeth, manageable periodontal condition, positive perceived oral health, satisfaction with their access to and receipt of dental services, and minimal functional problems, that together comprise a definition of successful aging. The International Collaborative Study for Oral Health Outcomes provides a data set for exploring the oral health of a diverse sample of older adults in US and international sites using the modified Andersen Behavioral Model. The percent of adults who report no natural teeth ranged from 16 percent in San Antonio to 59 percent in New Zealand. Seventy percent or more of the adults from each site rated their oral health as good/fair or better except in Poland. The current cohort of older adults is faring better on some indicators than others; nevertheless, ethnic minorities and poorer countries still demonstrate inequities. Dentistry must attempt to educate individuals early in their lifespan that a combination of personal oral health practices and current dental techniques offers the potential for successful oral health throughout one's lifetime. [source] Comparison of local International Sensitivity Index calibration and ,Direct INR' methods in correction of locally reported International Normalized Ratios: an international studyJOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, Issue 5 2007L. POLLER Summary.,Background:,It is no longer feasible to check local International Normalized Ratios (INR) by the World Health Organization International Sensitivity Index (ISI) calibrations because the necessary manual prothrombin time technique required has generally been discarded. Objectives:,An international collaborative study at 77 centers has compared local INR correction using the two alternative methods recommended in the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidelines: local ISI calibration and ,Direct INR'. Methods:,Success of INR correction by local ISI calibration and with Direct INR was assessed with a set of 27 certified lyophilized plasmas (20 from patients on warfarin and seven from normals). Results:,At 49 centers using human thromboplastins, 3.0% initial average local INR deviation from certified INR was reduced by local ISI calibration to 0.7%, and at 25 centers using rabbit reagents, from 15.9% to 7.5%. With a minority of commercial thromboplastins, mainly ,combined' rabbit reagents, INR correction was not achieved by local ISI calibration. However, when rabbit combined reagents were excluded the overall mean INR deviation after correction was reduced further to 3.9%. In contrast, with Direct INR, mean deviation using human thromboplastins increased from 3.0% to 6.6%, but there was some reduction with rabbit reagents from 15.9% to 10% (12.3% with combined reagents excluded). Conclusions:,Local ISI calibration gave INR correction for the majority of PT systems but failed at the small number using combined rabbit reagents suggesting a need for a combined reference thromboplastin. Direct INR correction was disappointing but better than local ISI calibration with combined rabbit reagents. Interlaboratory variability was improved by both procedures with human reagents only. [source] Prescribing antipsychotic drugs for inpatients with schizophrenia in Asia: Comparison of REAP-2001 and REAP-2004 studiesASIA-PACIFIC PSYCHIATRY, Issue 2 2010Mian-Yoon Chong MD PhD FRCPsych Abstract Introduction: This international collaborative study aimed to investigate the trend and change in prescription patterns of antipsychotic drugs for inpatient schizophrenia in Asia by comparing two surveys in 2001 and 2004. Methods: Prescription patterns of inpatient schizophrenia in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan were surveyed in July of 2001 and 2004 using a standardized protocol. Patients' social and clinical characteristics, psychiatric symptoms, course of illness and adverse effects of medications were systematically assessed and recorded. Prescription patterns of antipsychotic drugs were compared and analyzed. Results: Altogether, 4535 patients were surveyed. There were no significant differences in their demographic characteristics between 2001 and 2004. Compared with 2001, a significant increase in the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) (from 45.5% to 64.7%) with reciprocal decreasing use of first-generation antipsychotics was found in 2004. The trend was unanimously seen across these Asian countries and among those prescribed with monotherapy or polypharmacy. The proportion using monotherapy significantly increased, from 52.7% in 2001 to 61.1% in 2004. There was a tendency of using a lower dosage of antipsychotic medications and a less concomitant use of anti-Parkinson drugs. Discussion: The present study showed a trend of increasing use of SGA among Asian countries. Except for Japan and Singapore, a relatively low use of antipsychotic polypharmacy was generally found. The increasing use of SGA and policy changes reduced the mean duration of admission days. With increasing awareness of consumers and continuing education for psychiatrists, the trend is expected to continue. [source] | ||||||||||