Home  About us  Contact
 

Interhospital Transfer (interhospital + transfer)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences100%

Selected Abstracts

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Early Onset of Heart Failure:

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003
Feasibility of Interhospital Transfer for Coronary Angioplasty., Safety
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of interhospital transfer (within up to 60 minutes) for primary/rescue coronary angioplasty of patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by an early onset of acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to a community hospital without PCI facilities. Design and patients: From the multicenter randomized PRAGUE-1 study, a subgroup of 66 patients with AMI complicated by AHF on the first presentation to the community hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Group A patients(n = 21)were treated on site in community hospitals using thrombolysis (streptokinase), group B patients(n = 20)were transported with thrombolytic infusion to a PCI center for coronary angioplasty, and group C patients(n = 25)were immediately transported to a PCI center for primary angioplasty without thrombolysis. Results: No patient died during transportation. One group B patient developed ventricular fibrillation during transfer. The time delay from the onset of chest pain to reperfusion was >142 minutes, and 253 and 251 minutes in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Hospital stay (16 vs 11 vs 10 days,P = NS) was shorter in the angioplasty groups. Transported patients (groups B, C) displayed a significant decrease in heart failure progression within the first 24 hours after treatment (48% vs 15% vs 8%,P < 0.05). The combined end point, i.e., mortality + nonfatal reinfarction (43% vs 25% vs 8%,P < 0.05), was significantly less frequent in the coronary angioplasty group. Conclusions: Interhospital transfer for coronary angioplasty of patients with AMI complicated by an early onset of AHF is feasible and safe. Transport for angioplasty may even reduce the risk of heart failure progression and improve clinical outcome compared to immediate thrombolysis in the nearest community hospital. (J Interven Cardiol 2003;16:201,208) [source]

A Multicasualty Event: Out-of-hospital and In-hospital Organizational Aspects

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, Issue 10 2004
Malka Avitzour MPH
Abstract In a wedding celebration of 700 participants, the third floor of the hall in which the celebration was taking place suddenly collapsed. While the walls remained intact, all three floors of the building collapsed, causing Israel's largest disaster. Objectives: To study the management of a multicasualty event (MCE), in the out-of-hospital and in-hospital phases, including rescue, emergency medical services (EMS) deployment and evacuation of casualties, emergency department (ED) deployment, recalling staff, medical care, imaging procedures, hospitalization, secondary referral, and interhospital transfer of patients. Methods: Data on all the victims who arrived at the four EDs in Jerusalem were collected through medical files, telephone interviews, and hospital computerized information. Results: The disaster resulted in 23 fatalities and 315 injured people; 43% were hospitalized. During the first hour, 42% were evacuated and after seven hours the scene was empty. Ninety-seven basic life support ambulances, 18 mobile intensive care units, 600 emergency medical technicians, 40 paramedics, and 15 physicians took part in the out-of-hospital stage. At the hospitals, about 1,300 staff members arrived immediately, either on demand or voluntarily, a number that seems too large for this disaster. Computed tomography (CT) demand was over its capability. Conclusions: During this MCE, the authors observed "rotating" bottleneck phenomena within out-of-hospital and in-hospital systems. For maximal efficiency, hospitals need to fully coordinate the influx and transfer of patients with out-of-hospital rescue services as well as with other hospitals. Each hospital has to immediately deploy its operational center, which will manage and monitor the hospital's resources and facilitate coordination with the relevant institutions. [source]

Triage and interhospital transfer: influencing trauma mortality?

ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 7 2010
M. Rehn
No abstract is available for this article. [source]

Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Early Onset of Heart Failure:

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Issue 3 2003
Feasibility of Interhospital Transfer for Coronary Angioplasty., Safety
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of interhospital transfer (within up to 60 minutes) for primary/rescue coronary angioplasty of patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by an early onset of acute heart failure (AHF) admitted to a community hospital without PCI facilities. Design and patients: From the multicenter randomized PRAGUE-1 study, a subgroup of 66 patients with AMI complicated by AHF on the first presentation to the community hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Group A patients(n = 21)were treated on site in community hospitals using thrombolysis (streptokinase), group B patients(n = 20)were transported with thrombolytic infusion to a PCI center for coronary angioplasty, and group C patients(n = 25)were immediately transported to a PCI center for primary angioplasty without thrombolysis. Results: No patient died during transportation. One group B patient developed ventricular fibrillation during transfer. The time delay from the onset of chest pain to reperfusion was >142 minutes, and 253 and 251 minutes in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Hospital stay (16 vs 11 vs 10 days,P = NS) was shorter in the angioplasty groups. Transported patients (groups B, C) displayed a significant decrease in heart failure progression within the first 24 hours after treatment (48% vs 15% vs 8%,P < 0.05). The combined end point, i.e., mortality + nonfatal reinfarction (43% vs 25% vs 8%,P < 0.05), was significantly less frequent in the coronary angioplasty group. Conclusions: Interhospital transfer for coronary angioplasty of patients with AMI complicated by an early onset of AHF is feasible and safe. Transport for angioplasty may even reduce the risk of heart failure progression and improve clinical outcome compared to immediate thrombolysis in the nearest community hospital. (J Interven Cardiol 2003;16:201,208) [source]