Androgen Independent (androgen + independent)

Distribution by Scientific Domains


Selected Abstracts


Ras signaling in prostate cancer progression

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, Issue 1 2004
Michael J. Weber
Abstract When prostate cancer is first detected it generally is dependent on the presence of androgens for growth, and responds to androgen ablation therapies. However, the disease often recurs in a disseminated and apparently androgen independent (AI) form, and in this state is almost invariably fatal. Considerable evidence indicates that the Androgen receptor (AR) continues to be required even in androgen independent (AI) disease. Thus, a key to understanding hormone independent prostate cancer is to determine the mechanism(s) by which the AR can function even in the absence of physiologic levels of androgen. In this article, we argue that growth factors and receptors that utilize Ras family members drive prostate cancer progression to a state of androgen hypersensitivity; and that post-translational modifications (e.g., phosphorylations) of transcriptional cofactors might be responsible for modulating the function of the AR so that it is active even at low concentrations of androgen. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Telomerase enzyme inhibition (TEI) and cytolytic therapy in the management of androgen independent osseous metastatic prostate cancer

THE PROSTATE, Issue 6 2010
Yingming Li
Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent prostate cancer can be osseous, androgen independent and lethal. The purpose is to discern the efficacy of synthetic small molecule telomerase enzyme inhibitors (TEI) alone or in combination with other cytotoxic therapies in controlling metastatic osseous prostate cancer. METHODS C4-2B was pre-treated with a match or mismatch TEI for 6 weeks and then inoculated into nude mice subcutaneously or intraosseously. In a separate experiment, untreated C4-2B was injected into femur of nude mice. The mice were divided into seven systemic "combination" treatment groups of control, Ad-BSP-E1a virus, docetaxel, mismatch and match TEI. Serum PSA was followed longitudinally. Histology analyses and histomorphometry were performed. Repeated measure analysis was applied for statistical analysis and Bonferroni method was used in multiple comparisons. RESULTS In the pre-treated study, the PSA of match treated cells in subcutaneous or intraosseous model was significantly lower than mismatch TEI or PBS treated group (P,<,0.05). Histology revealed increased fibrosis, apoptosis and decreased PSA staining in the match TEI treated subcutaneous xenografts. In the combination treatment study, the PSA was significantly lower in single/double treatment and triple treatment than control (P,<,0.05). Histology revealed that triple therapy mice had normal femur architecture. Histomorphometrics revealed that the area of femur tumor and woven bone was significantly positively correlated (P,=,0.007). CONCLUSIONS Multiple lines of data point toward the efficacy of systemically administered telomerase inhibitors. Combining cytotoxic regimens with telomerase inhibitors could be beneficial in controlling prostate cancer. Clinical trials are warranted to explore the efficacy of TEI in prostate cancer. Prostate 70: 616,629, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Elevated serum progastrin-releasing peptide (31,98) in metastatic and androgen-independent prostate cancer patients,

THE PROSTATE, Issue 2 2002
Masahiro Yashi
Abstract BACKGROUND Increases in neuroendocrine phenotype and secretory products are closely correlated with tumor progression and androgen independence in prostate cancer. In this study, we explored this correlation using serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), a carboxy-terminal region common to three subtypes of precursors for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP), which is released from the neuroendocrine phenotype to act as a growth factor. METHODS In 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 200 with prostate cancer, serum ProGRP levels were determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit and evaluated in relation to clinical stage, hormonal treatment, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. Fourteen randomly selected patients were entered in the follow-up study. Additionally, expression of ProGRP as determined by immunohistochemical analysis was compared to that of chromogranin-A (CgA) in tissue samples from several subjects. RESULTS We found a positive correlation between PSA and ProGRP in patients with untreated prostate cancer; no correlation was found in the treated groups. The increases in the ProGRP value and in the percentage of patients with higher than normal values were significant (P,<,0.0001), especially in the androgen-independent group (P,<,0.0001). A longitudinal study showed that, in a subset of patients, the ProGRP values tended to increase transiently when the cancer became androgen independent, but remained unchanged or decreased at the androgen-dependent stage. Positive staining for ProGRP occurred in a different distribution in neuroendocrine tissues than that of staining for CgA. CONCLUSIONS The clinical results demonstrated the existence of a regulatory mechanism for GRP, which to date had only been observed in cell lines. These findings suggest that GRP is a growth factor potentially upregulated by androgen but that does not rely principally on androgen modulation. The large overlap in levels of ProGRP among the groups limits the use of this value as a monitoring tool. Measurement of ProGRP, however, does have potential as an independent parameter to evaluate androgen-independent progression and to facilitate a new therapeutic strategy that may compensate for current limitations of diagnosis based on PSA alone. Prostate 51: 84,97, 2002. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


PEAZ-1: A new human prostate neoplastic epithelial cell line

THE PROSTATE, Issue 2 2001
Monika Schmelz
Abstract BACKGROUND The generation of prostatic cell lines provides in vitro models for experimental studies of the pathogenesis of prostate carcinoma. Therefore, we established and characterized a new human prostate epithelial cell line, PEAZ-1 (prostate epithelial Arizona-1). METHODS The PEAZ-1 cells were grown from a primary human prostate carcinoma specimen obtained from radical prostatectomy. The isolated cells were characterized by immunobiochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and tumorigenicity studies. RESULTS PEAZ-1 cells are near diploid, tumorigenic, and androgen independent for cell growth. PEAZ-1 cells express N-cadherin, ,- and ,-catenins, and p120 at cell,cell contacts, cytoplasmic laminin 5, vinculin, paxillin, and phosphotyrosine at focal adhesions, vimentin, and cytokeratins 8 and 18. They do not express plakoglobin, E-cadherin, and PSA, and do not form desmosomes and hemidesomomes. PEAZ-1 respond to ocadaic acid, a pro-apoptotic agent, by expression of p53. CONCLUSIONS PEAZ-1 cells is a human prostate cancer cell line that has a number of mesenchymal characteristics. Prostate 48:79,92, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [source]


Prolonging androgen sensitivity in prostate cancer , a role for COX inhibitors?

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 9 2009
Andrew Richards
Abstract Background:, Advanced prostate cancer has long been known to respond to androgen deprivation, but disease inevitably progresses to become androgen independent. Lengthening the responsive period is an important, yet underinvestigated, clinical goal. This study aims to determine whether cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are potentially useful agents in prolonging androgen sensitivity. Methods:, The expression of COX-2 in human prostate surgical specimens, both benign and malignant, androgen dependent and independent, was determined by immunohistochemistry. Nude mice, in which prostate cancer xenografts had been established, were castrated and randomized to receive either COX-2 inhibitor or vehicle for 8 weeks. Time to androgen independence (AIPC), growth rate and rate of PSA rise were compared between groups. COX-2 expression, at the mRNA and protein level, was determined in the native xenograft cell line and in tissues of varying androgen sensitivity derived from the xenografts. Results:, In human tissues, COX-2 protein was expressed in prostate epithelium and was upregulated in prostate cancer and remained upregulated after androgen ablation and in the androgen-independent state. Tissue obtained from the LNCaP xenograft model showed variable COX-2 expression, with some evidence of downregulation in AIPC. The addition of a COX-2 inhibitor to castration does not lengthen the time to AIPC (P= 0.53), rate of tumour growth (P= 0.59) or rate of PSA rise (P= 0.34) in the LNCaP xenograft model. Conclusion:, This study does not support a role for COX-2 inhibitors in prolonging androgen responsiveness in prostate cancer. [source]