			Home About us Contact

Instrumental Deliveries (instrumental + delivery)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Can antenatal education influence how women push in labour?

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial on Maternal Antenatal Teaching for Pushing in Second Stage of Labour (PUSH STUDY)
Background:, Antenatal education on the physiology of second stage of labour and effective pushing has not been studied in the literature. Anecdotal observation seems to indicate that some nulliparous women are (at least initially) unable to push effectively. A large proportion seem to reflexly contract the levator ani muscle when asked to push which may have the effect of slowing the progress of labour. Aims:, To test the effectiveness of structured antenatal education for pushing in the second stage of labour versus normal care and its impact on delivery outcome. Methods: One hundred nulliparous women between 35 and 37 weeks gestation were randomised. Intervention: Two 15-min structured education sessions, one week apart, utilising observation of the perineum and a vaginal examination to teach correct technique for relaxing the levator ani muscle and effective pushing. Results:, In both groups, 31 of 50 women (62%) delivered vaginally. Instrumental delivery and caesarean section rates did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.78, relative risk = 1). The mean duration of active second stage for the control group was 53.96 min compared with 57.26 min for the intervention group. This difference of 3.3 min was not statistically significant (P = 0.56). Knowledge of women in the intervention group was increased and the majority of women found the educational sessions helpful. Conclusion:, Antenatal teaching to ensure effective maternal pushing in labour did not result in altered obstetric outcomes relative to the control group. However, there was a measurable qualitative effect from the intervention in that women clearly felt the education sessions to be helpful. [source]

Original Article: Predicting the outcome of induction of labour

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 4 2010
Ralph NADER
Objective:, To test whether prediction of delivery outcome is feasible in post-term nulliparous pregnant women, using a published model and a locally produced model combining clinical and ultrasound assessment. Methods:, This is a prospective pilot study of 53 nulliparous women seen in a postdates clinic between 40 weeks four days and 41 weeks three days of gestation. They underwent a routine assessment including transabdominal ultrasound to determine amniotic fluid index, a Bishop score, and translabial ultrasound to determine the station of the fetal head at rest and bladder neck descent at rest and on valsalva. Additional information such as body weight at booking and current weight, height and a family history of caesarean section was obtained. Delivery outcome and labour details were obtained from the local obstetric database. Two models for prediction of delivery outcome were tested. Results:, Forty-nine complete datasets were analysed. Fourteen women had a normal vaginal delivery, 17 instrumental deliveries and 18 caesarean sections. A published model predicted the induction outcome in 62%. A local model using maternal age, body mass index, family history of caesarean section, station of the fetal head and bladder neck descent predicted vaginal delivery in 70% in our study. Conclusion:, Prediction of delivery outcome is of limited feasibility in post-term nulliparous pregnant women. Our locally produced model was successful in predicting vaginal delivery in 70% of women. Prediction of delivery outcome may not be sufficiently powerful to allow modification of current obstetric practice. [source]

Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium.

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 5 2009
Maternal, neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery
Background:, The use of Kjelland's forceps is now uncommon, and published maternal and neonatal outcome data are from deliveries conducted more than a decade ago. The role of Kjelland's rotational delivery in the ,modern era' of high caesarean section rates is unclear. Aims:, To compare the results of attempted Kjelland's forceps rotational delivery with other methods of instrumental delivery in a tertiary hospital. Methods:, Retrospective review of all instrumental deliveries for singleton pregnancies 34 or more weeks gestation in a four-year birth cohort, with reference to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results:, The outcomes of 1067 attempted instrumental deliveries were analysed. Kjelland's forceps were successful in 95% of attempts. Kjelland's forceps deliveries had a rate of adverse maternal outcomes indistinguishable from non-rotational ventouse, and lower than all other forms of instrumental delivery. Kjelland's forceps also had a lower rate of adverse neonatal outcomes than all other forms of instrumental delivery. Conclusions:, Prudent use of Kjelland's forceps by experienced operators is associated with a very low rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Training in this important obstetric skill should be reconsidered urgently, before it is lost forever. [source]

Characteristics and practices of birth centres in Australia

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2009
Paula J. LAWS
Background: Around 2% of women who give birth in Australia each year give birth in a birth centre. There is currently no standard definition of a birth centre in Australia. Aims: This study aimed to locate all birth centres nationally, describe their characteristics and procedures, and develop a definition. Methods: Surveys were sent to 23 birth centres. Questions included: types of procedures, equipment and pain relief available, staffing, funding, philosophies, physical characteristics and transfer procedures. Of the birth centres, 19 satisfied the inclusion criteria and 16 completed surveys. Results: Three constructs of a birth centre were identified. A ,commitment to normality of pregnancy and birth' was most commonly reported as the most important philosophy (44%). The predominant model of care was group practice/caseload midwifery (63%). Thirteen birth centres were located within/attached to a hospital, two were on a hospital campus and one was freestanding. The distance to the nearest labour ward ranged from 2 m to 15 km. Reported intrapartum transfer rates ranged from 7% to 29%. Thirteen centres had a special care nursery or neonatal intensive care unit onsite, or both. Eight centres undertook artificial rupture of membranes for induction of labour, while two administered oxytocin or prostaglandins. All centres offered nitrous oxide and local anaesthetic. Twelve centres had systemic opioids available and one offered pudendal analgesia. Fetal monitoring was used in all birth centres. Only three centres conducted instrumental deliveries, while 15 performed episiotomies. Conclusion: Birth centres vary in their philosophies, characteristics and service delivery. [source]

Antenatal Perineal Massage for Reducing Perineal Trauma

BIRTH, Issue 2 2006
M.M. Beckmann
Background:, Perineal trauma following vaginal birth can be associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity. Antenatal perineal massage has been proposed as one method of decreasing the incidence of perineal trauma. Objectives:, To assess the effect of antenatal perineal massage on the incidence of perineal trauma at birth and subsequent morbidity. Search strategy:, We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (30 January 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005), PubMed (1966 to January 2005), EMBASE (1980 to January 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles. Selection criteria:, Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating any described method of antenatal perineal massage undertaken for at least the last four weeks of pregnancy. Data collection and analysis:, Both review authors independently applied the selection criteria, extracted data from the included studies and assessed study quality. We contacted study authors for additional information. Main results:, Three trials (2434 women) comparing digital perineal massage with control were included. All were of good quality. Antenatal perineal massage was associated with an overall reduction in the incidence of trauma requiring suturing (three trials, 2417 women, relative risk (RR) 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.96), number needed to treat (NNT) 16 (10 to 39)). This reduction was statistically significant for women without previous vaginal birth only (three trials, 1925 women, RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.96), NNT 14 (9 to 35)). Women who practised perineal massage were less likely to have an episiotomy (three trials, 2417 women, RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.97), NNT 23 (13 to 111)). Again this reduction was statistically significant for women without previous vaginal birth only (three trials, 1925 women, RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.97), NNT 20 (11 to 110)). No differences were seen in the incidence of 1st or 2nd degree perineal tears or 3rd/4th degree perineal trauma. Only women who have previously birthed vaginally reported a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of pain at three months postpartum (one trial, 376 women, RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.91) NNT 13 (7 to 60)). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of instrumental deliveries, sexual satisfaction, or incontinence of urine, faeces or flatus for any women who practised perineal massage compared with those who did not massage. Authors' conclusions:, Antenatal perineal massage reduces the likelihood of perineal trauma (mainly episiotomies) and the reporting of ongoing perineal pain and is generally well accepted by women. As such, women should be made aware of the likely benefit of perineal massage and provided with information on how to massage. *** The preceding report is an Abstract of a regularly updated, systematic review prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464,780X). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006 Issue 1. Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Carbohydrate solution intake during labour just before the start of the second stage: a double-blind study on metabolic effects and clinical outcome

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 12 2004
H.C.J. Scheepers
Objective To study the effects of oral carbohydrate ingestion on clinical outcome and on maternal and fetal metabolism. Design Prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Setting Leyenburg Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands. Population Two hundred and two nulliparous women. Methods In labour, at 8 to 10 cm of cervical dilatation, the women were asked to drink a solution containing either 25 g carbohydrates or placebo. In a subgroup of 28 women, metabolic parameters were measured. Main outcome measures Number of instrumental deliveries, fetal and maternal glucose, free fatty acids, lactate, pH, Pco2, base excess/deficit and ,-hydroxybutyrate. Results Drinking a carbohydrate-enriched solution just before starting the second stage of labour did not reduce instrumental delivery rate (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9,1.3). Caesarean section rate was lower in the carbohydrate group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (1%vs 7%, RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.02,1.2). In the carbohydrate group, maternal free fatty acids decreased and the lactate increased. In the umbilical cord there was a positive venous,arterial lactate difference in the carbohydrate group and a negative one in the placebo group, but the differences in pH and base deficit were comparable. Conclusion Intake of carbohydrates just before the second stage does not reduce instrumental delivery rate. The venous,arterial difference in the umbilical cord suggested lactate transport to the fetal circulation but did not result in fetal acidaemia. [source]

Unexpected reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect?

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2003
W.C. Leung
Objective The study was originally designed to identify the risk factors that could predict those difficult instrumental deliveries resulting in birth trauma and birth asphyxia. Design A prospective study on all singleton deliveries in cephalic presentation with an attempt of instrumental delivery over a 12-month period (13 March 2000 to 12 March 2001). Setting A local teaching hospital. Sample Six hundred and seventy deliveries. Methods A codesheet was designed to record the demographic data, characteristics of first and second stages of labour and neonatal outcome. In particular, the doctor had to enter the pelvic examination findings before the attempt of instrumental delivery. Main outcome measures Birth trauma and birth asphyxia. Results There was a significant reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period (0.6%) when compared with that (2.8%) in the pre-study period (1998 and 1999) (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11,0.70). There was more trial of instrumental deliveries in the operating theatre although this was not statistically significant (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.88,1.60). The instrumental delivery rate decreased during the study period (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82,0.94). The caesarean section rate for no progress of labour, the incidence of direct second stage caesarean section and the incidence of failed instrumental delivery did not increase during the study period. Conclusions Apart from the merits of regular audit exercise and increasing experience of the staff, the Hawthorne effect might be the major contributing factor in the reduction of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period. [source]

Women's expectations of management in their next pregnancy after an unexplained stillbirth: An Internet-based empirical study

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 6 2009
Stephen J. ROBSON
Background:, Unexplained stillbirth is the largest contributor to perinatal death, accounting for one-third of stillbirths. There appears to be no increase in perinatal death rates in the pregnancies that follow an unexplained stillbirth. However, these pregnancies have increased rates of induced labour and elective caesarean section, as well as preterm birth, low birthweight, instrumental delivery, ,fetal distress' and postpartum haemorrhage. Aim:, To study the wishes for future pregnancy management in women who have suffered an unexplained stillbirth. Methods: An Internet-based survey of women after an unexplained stillbirth, seeking demographic information and reproductive history, details of management of the index stillbirth and information about their wishes for subsequent pregnancy management (antenatal surveillance, early delivery and caesarean delivery). Results:, Of the total respondents included in the study, 93% wanted ,testing' over and above normal pregnancy care in their next pregnancy. Of the respondents, 81% wanted early delivery and 26% wanted a Caesarean delivery, irrespective of obstetric indications. These wishes were not influenced by socio-demographic factors, management of the index stillbirth (with the exception of having had a Caesarean delivery) or advice received on management of the next pregnancy (with the exception of being advised to have an early or Caesarean delivery). Conclusions:, The women surveyed wanted increased fetal surveillance and early delivery, but not necessarily elective caesarean section. [source]

Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium.

Epidural versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia in Labour

BIRTH, Issue 1 2006
Article first published online: 28 JUN 200
A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 16 August 2005. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary. Abstract Background:, Epidural analgesia is a central nerve block technique achieved by injection of a local anaesthetic close to the nerves that transmit pain and is widely used as a form of pain relief in labour. However, there are concerns regarding unintended adverse effects on the mother and infant. Objectives:, To assess the effects of all modalities of epidural analgesia (including combined-spinal-epidural) on the mother and the baby, when compared with non-epidural or no pain relief during labour. Search strategy:, We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (June 2005). Selection criteria:, Randomised controlled trials comparing all modalities of epidural with any form of pain relief not involving regional blockade, or no pain relief in labour. Data collection and analysis Two of the review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility, methodological quality and extracted all data. Data were entered into RevMan and double checked. Primary analysis was by intention-to-treat; sensitivity analyses excluded trials with >30% of women receiving un-allocated treatment. Main results:, Twenty-one studies involving 6664 women were included, all but one study compared epidural analgesia with opiates. For technical reasons, data on women's perception of pain relief in labour could only be included from one study, which found epidural analgesia to offer better pain relief than non-epidural analgesia (weighted mean difference (WMD),2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI),3.82 to ,1.38, 1 trial, 105 women). However, epidural analgesia was associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal birth (relative risk (RR) 1.38, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.53, 17 trials, 6162 women). There was no evidence of a significant difference in the risk of caesarean delivery (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.23, 20 trials, 6534 women), long-term backache (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12, 2 trials, 814 women), low neonatal Apgar scores at 5 minutes (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.10, 14 trials, 5363 women), and maternal satisfaction with pain relief (RR 1.18 95% CI 0.92 to 1.50, 5 trials, 1940 women). No studies reported on rare but potentially serious adverse effects of epidural analgesia. Authors' conclusions:, Epidural analgesia appears to be effective in reducing pain during labour. However, women who use this form of pain relief are at increased risk of having an instrumental delivery. Epidural analgesia had no statistically significant impact on the risk of caesarean section, maternal satisfaction with pain relief and long-term backache and did not appear to have an immediate effect on neonatal status as determined by Apgar scores. Further research may be helpful to evaluate rare but potentially severe adverse effects of epidural analgesia on women in labour and long-term neonatal outcomes. Citation:, Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000331.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2. *** The preceding report is an abstract of a regularly updated, systematic review prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full text of the review is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1465,1858). Abstracts of Cochrane reviews are compiled and produced by Update Software Ltd on behalf of the publisher, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [source]

Unexpected reduction in the incidence of birth trauma and birth asphyxia related to instrumental deliveries during the study period: was this the Hawthorne effect?

A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 12 2002
Myra Fitzpatrick
Objective To assess the effects of delayed vs immediate pushing in second stage of labour with epidural analgesia on delivery outcome, postpartum faecal continence and postpartum anal sphincter and pudendal nerve function. Design Prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Setting Tertiary referral maternity teaching hospital. Population One hundred and seventy nulliparous women randomised at full dilatation to immediate or delayed pushing. Methods A total of 178 nulliparous women, all with continuous epidural analgesia, were randomised at full cervical dilatation, but before the fetal head had reached the pelvic floor, to either immediate pushing or 1 hour delayed pushing. Labour outcome was analysed and all women underwent postpartum assessment of anal sphincter function, including anal manometry. Those women who had a normal delivery underwent neurophysiology studies, while those women who had an instrumental delivery underwent endoanal ultrasound. Main outcome measures Mode of delivery; altered faecal continence. Results Ninety women were randomised to immediate pushing and 88 to delayed pushing. The spontaneous delivery rate was 56% (50/90) in the immediate pushing group and 52% (46/88) in the delayed pushing group. Mean duration of labour for the immediate pushing group was 427 minutes compared with 480 minutes for the delayed pushing group (P= 0.005). Eighty-four percent (76/90) of women in the immediate pushing group received oxytocin to augment labour, 21/76 (28%) in the second stage only. Eighty-one percent (71/88) of women in the delayed pushing group received oxytocin to augment labour, 22/71 (31%) in the second stage only. Fetal outcome did not differ between the two groups. Episiotomy rates were 73% and 69% in the immediate pushing and delayed pushing groups, respectively. 26% (23/90) of the immediate pushing group and 38% (33/88) of the delayed pushing group complained of altered faecal continence after delivery (NS). Manometry, ultrasound and neurophysiology studies did not differ significantly between the two groups. Overall, 55% of women after instrumental delivery had endosonographic evidence of damage to the external anal sphincter, while 36% of women after spontaneous delivery had abnormal neurophysiology studies. Conclusions Rates of instrumental delivery were similar following immediate and delayed pushing, in association with epidural analgesia. Delayed pushing prolonged labour by 1 hour but did not result in significantly higher rates of altered continence or anal sphincter injury, when compared with immediate pushing. [source]

High incidence of obstetric interventions after successful external cephalic version

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 6 2002
Louis Yik-Si Chan
Objective To investigate the delivery outcome after successful external cephalic version (ECV). Design Case,control study. Setting University teaching hospital. Population The study group consisted of 279 consecutive singleton deliveries at term over a six-year period, all of which had had successful ECV performed. The control group included 28,447 singleton term deliveries during the same six-year period. Methods Between group differences were compared with the Mann,Whitney U test or Student's t test where appropriate. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for categorical variables. Main outcome measures Incidence of and indications for obstetric interventions. Results The risk of instrumental delivery and emergency caesarean section was higher in the ECV group (14.3%vs 12.8%; OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.0,2.0, and 23.3%vs 9.4%; OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3,4.1, respectively). The higher caesarean rate was due to an increase in all major indications, namely, suspected fetal distress, failure to progress in labour and failed induction. The higher incidence of instrumental delivery was mainly due to an increase in prolonged second stage. The odds ratio for operative delivery remained significant after controlling for potential confounding variables. There were also significantly greater frequencies of labour induction (24.0%vs 13.4%; OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5,2.7) and use of epidural analgesia (20.4%vs 12.4%; OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.4,2.4) by women in the ECV group. The higher induction rate is mainly due to induction for post term, abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) and antepartum haemorrhage (APH) of unknown origin. Conclusion The incidence of operative delivery and other obstetric interventions are higher in pregnancies after successful ECV. Women undergoing ECV should be informed about this higher risk of interventions. [source]

Outcome for children born after in utero laser ablation therapy for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

BJOG : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 12 2001
A.G. Sutcliffe
Objective To examine the postnatal development of a group of children born after in utero laser ablation therapy for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Design Retrospective cohort outcome study involving assessment of neurodevelopment and physical well being. Setting Harris Birthright Centre, King's College Hospital, London. Participants Twins and singleton survivors treated via laser ablation therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome over a four-year period. Methods Of 54 families contacted to participate in the study, who had been treated for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome during a four-year period, 24 families attended for paediatric assessment; 12 pairs of twins and 12 singleton survivors were assessed for perinatal, neurological and neurodevelopmental outcome using the Griffiths scales of mental development. A further 20 families were assessed via a proforma after contact with their general practitioner. A comparison of these groups showed no significant differences in sociodemographic factors or severity of disease between responders (44 families, 81.5%) and non-responders (10 families). Results The group of children assessed by a paediatrician had low birthweight (1619g donor, 1814g recipient, 1877g singleton) and had been born preterm (33 weeks twins, 31.2 weeks singleton) with attendant increased resuscitation, neonatal unit admission (mean 40 days) and instrumental delivery. Mean Griffiths scores were within the normal range of ability (91.2 donor vs 97.7 recipient and 101.6 singletons) with the only significant difference being in the locomotor subscale where donor (82.6) and recipient (85.3) were less than singletons: -99.1 (P<0.05). There was no cerebral palsy in the singleton survivors, but there were five cases in the twin group. All except one affected child (with quadriplegia) had mean Griffiths scores in the normal range. In the GP proforma group there was one case, in a twin, of cerebral palsy. Conclusion The overall cerebral palsy rate was 9%: 0% in the singleton survivors group and 13.3% in the twin survivors group. This pilot data highlights the need for careful long term follow up of children affected by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. [source]