			Home About us Contact

Insulin Independence (insulin + independence)

Distribution by Scientific Domains

Medical Sciences	100%

Selected Abstracts

Prolonged Insulin Independence After Islet Allotransplants in Recipients with Type 1 Diabetes

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 11 2008
M. D. Bellin
We sought to determine the long-term outcomes in type 1 diabetic recipients of intraportal alloislet transplants on a modified immunosuppressive protocol. Six recipients with hypoglycemia unawareness received one to two islet infusions. Induction therapy was with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) plus etanercept for tumor necrosis factor-, blockade. Recipients received cyclosporine and everolimus for maintenance immunosuppression for the first year posttransplant, with mycophenolic acid or mycophenolate mofetil subsequently substituted for everolimus. Recipients have been followed for 1173 ± 270 days since their last infusion for islet graft function (insulin independence, hemoglobin A1c levels and C-peptide production) and for adverse events associated with the study protocol. Of the six recipients, five were insulin-independent at 1 year, and four continue to be insulin-independent at a mean of 3.4 ± 0.4 years posttransplant. None of the six recipients experienced recurrence of severe hypoglycemia. Measured glomerular filtration rate decreased from 110.5 ± 21.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 pretransplant to 82.6 ±19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 year posttransplant. In conclusion, islet transplants restored insulin independence for a mean of >3 years in four of six recipients treated with ATG and etanercept induction therapy and with cyclosporine and, initially, everolimus for maintenance. Our results suggest this immunosuppressive protocol may allow long-term graft survival. [source]

Advances in pancreatic islet transplantation in humans

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, Issue 1 2006
Sulaiman A. Nanji
With recent advances in methods of islet isolation and the introduction of more potent and less diabetogenic immunosuppressive therapies, islet transplantation has progressed from research to clinical reality. Presently, several international centres have demonstrated successful clinical outcomes with high rates of insulin independence after islet transplantation. Ongoing refinements in donor pancreas procurement and processing, developments in islet isolation and purification technology, and advances in novel immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to the acceptance of islet transplantation as a safe and effective therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. This review provides a historical perspective of islet transplantation, outlines the recent advances and current clinical outcomes, and addresses the present challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation. [source]

Islet transplantation: where do we stand now?,

DIABETES/METABOLISM: RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, Issue 3 2003
Boaz Hirshberg
Abstract After many years of limited success in islet transplantation, researchers developing this procedure have made great strides, and several centers have now reported that islet transplantation can result in long-term insulin independence for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The improved quality of life achieved in some islet allograft recipients suggests that this important line of investigation should proceed. Yet, several factors limit the technique and these hurdles must be overcome before it can be considered a practical treatment for the millions of individuals with diabetes, be it type 1 or type 2. Most obvious is the gross disparity between the number of islets available for clinical transplantation and the number of patients with diabetes who might benefit. Other important limitations, too often lost in the discussion, include complications associated with the technique itself, the toxicity of currently available immunosuppressive drugs, and the imperfect glycemia control achieved in most patients. In fact, our ongoing analysis as to whether transplantation-based therapy improves survival for patients with type 1 diabetes suggests that, for many at least, the opposite may be true. Two variables, as yet undefined, also need to be considered: (1) can the procedure, when done well, prevent or reverse diabetes-associated complications and (2) what are the long-term consequences of intrahepatic islets? Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Clinical islet transplant: current and future directions towards tolerance

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Issue 1 2003
A. M. James Shapiro
Summary:, The ultimate goal of islet transplantation is to completely correct the diabetic state from an unlimited donor source, without the need for chronic immunosuppressive drug therapy. Although islet transplantation provides an opportunity to develop innovative strategies for tolerance in the clinic, both alloimmune and autoimmune barriers must be controlled, if stable graft function is to be maintained long-term. After islet extraction from the pancreas, the cellular graft may be stored in tissue culture or cryopreserved for banking, providing an opportunity not only to optimally condition the recipient but also to allow in vitro immunologic manipulation of the graft before transplantation, unlike solid organ grafts. As such, islets may be considered a ,special case.' Remarkable progress has occurred in the last three years, with dramatic improvements in outcomes after clinical islet transplantation. The introduction of a steroid-free, sirolimus-based, anti-rejection protocol and islets prepared from two (or rarely three) donors led to high rates of insulin independence. The ,Edmonton Protocol' has been successfully replicated by other centers in an international multicenter trial. A number of key refinements in pancreas transportation, processing, purification on non-ficoll-based media, storage of islets in culture for two days and newer immunological conditioning and induction therapies have led to continued advancement through extensive collaboration between key centers. This review outlines the historical development of islet transplantation over the past 30 years, provides an update on current clinical outcomes, and summarizes a series of unique opportunities for development and early testing of tolerance protocols in patients. [source]

Abstracts of the 8th Meeting of the Italian Peripheral Nerve Study Group: 79

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Issue 1 2003
U Del Carro
Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common secondary complications of diabetes mellitus, causing severe and prolonged morbidity. However, clinical and experimental studies have reported that careful glucose control may prevent, stabilize, and/or reverse neuropathy and other chronic diabetic complications. Unfortunately, insulin therapy does not prevent the development or progression of chronic lesions in the vessels, kidneys, eyes, or nerves of the diabetic patient. There is great interest in investigating other forms of endocrine replacement therapy, such as transplantation of the pancreas or of the islets of Langerhans (IT). Diabetic polyneuropathy (DP) evolution is characterized by progressive demyelination and axonal loss and is manifested by signs and symptoms on physical examination and abnormalities in nerve conduction studies (NCS). NCS provide reliable, noninvasive, objective measures of peripheral nerve function and constitute the most important technique for the evaluation of the severity of DP in clinical trials. Several research groups have demonstrated that skin biopsy with measurement of intraepidermal nerve fiber density is another method minimally invasive and repeatable that provides direct pathologic evidence of axonal damage in diabetic neuropathy. Fifty-one consecutive IDDM patients with or without end stage renal disease were enrolled at the moment of islet (Is), kidney (KD), kidney-pancreas (KP) or kidney-islet (KI) transplantation. Patients underwent skin biopsy punch, neurologic examination and neurophysiological investigation. Particularly, 20 pts underwent KP tx, 16 KD tx, 10 islet tx and 5 KI. The patients were comparable for duration of diabetes, dialysis (when present), age, lipid profile. In half of the patients a follow-up of 2 years has been reached. After KP tx, and partially with KI, a complete normalization of glycometabolic control has been achieved, with statistically lower HbA1c in comparison with KD group (KP = 6.2; 0.1% vs. KD = 8.4; 0.5%; p < 0.01). In the KI/Is group, a long-term restoration of islet endocrine function has been achieved, with insulin independence. When this has been lost, a persistent secretion of C-peptide was shown for a long period of time. This was correlated with a global improvement quality of life and vascular structure. Preliminary results will be presented. [source]

Experience with a Novel Efalizumab-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen to Facilitate Single Donor Islet Cell Transplantation

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 9 2010
N. A. Turgeon
Islet transplantation is an experimental therapy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). It remains limited by immunosuppressive drug toxicity, progressive loss of insulin independence, allosensitization and the need for multiple islet donors. We describe our experience with an efalizumab-based immunosuppressive regimen as compared to the prevailing standard regimen, the Edmonton protocol. Twelve patients with T1DM received islet transplants: eight were treated with the Edmonton protocol; four were treated with daclizumab induction, a 6-month course of tacrolimus, and maintenance with efalizumab and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was insulin independence after one islet infusion. Only two Edmonton protocol treated patients achieved the primary endpoint; six required islets from multiple donors, and all experienced leukopenia, mouth ulcers, anemia, diarrhea and hypertransaminasemia. Four became allosensitized. All patients treated with the efalizumab-based regimen achieved insulin independence with normal hemoglobin A1c after a single islet cell infusion and remained insulin independent while on efalizumab. These patients experienced significantly fewer side effects and none became allosensitized. Trial continuation was terminated by withdrawal of efalizumab from the market. These data suggest that this efalizumab-based regimen prevents islet rejection, is well tolerated, and allows for single donor islet transplantation. [source]

Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetics Using an Immunosuppressive Protocol Based on the Anti-LFA-1 Antibody Efalizumab

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010
A. M. Posselt
The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival. [source]

Human Islet Isolation for Autologous Transplantation: Comparison of Yield and Function Using SERVA/Nordmark Versus Roche Enzymes

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 10 2009
T. Anazawa
Islet autotransplantation (IAT) is used to preserve as much insulin-secretory capacity as possible in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy for painful chronic pancreatitis. The enzyme used to dissociate the pancreas is a critical determinant of islet yield, which is correlated with posttransplant function. Here, we present our experience with IAT procedures to compare islet product data using the new enzyme SERVA/Nordmark (SN group; n = 46) with the standard enzyme Liberase-HI (LH group; n = 40). Total islet yields (mean ± standard deviation; 216 417 ± 79 278 islet equivalent [IEQ] in the LH group; 227 958 ± 58 544 IEQ in the SN group; p = 0.67) were similar. However, the percentage of embedded islets is higher in the SN group compared to the LH group. Significant differences were found in pancreas digestion time, dilution time, and digested pancreas weight between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed the two groups differed in portal venous pressure changes. The incidence of graft function and insulin independence was not different between the two groups. The SN and LH enzymes are associated with similar outcomes for IAT. Further optimization of the collagenase/neutral protease ratio is necessary to reduce the number of embedded islets obtained when using the SN enzyme. [source]

Allograft-Specific Cytokine Profiles Associate with Clinical Outcome After Islet Cell Transplantation

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009
V. A. L. Huurman
Islet cell transplantation can cure type 1 diabetes, but allograft rejection and recurrent autoimmunity may contribute to decreasing insulin independence over time. In this study we report the association of allograft-specific proliferative and cytokine profiles with clinical outcome. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained of 20 islet recipients. Cytokine values in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC) were determined using stimulator cells with graft-specific HLA class II. Qualitative and quantitative cytokine profiles were determined before and after islet transplantation, blinded from clinical outcome. Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) assays were performed to determine HLA class I alloreactivity. Allograft-specific cytokine profiles were skewed toward a Th2 or regulatory (Treg) phenotype after transplantation in insulin-independent, but not in insulin-requiring recipients. IFN,/IL10 ratio and MLC proliferation decreased after transplantation in insulin-independent recipients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.01, respectively). Production of the Treg cytokine IL10 inversely correlated with proliferation in alloreactive MLC (p = 0.008) and CTLp (p = 0.005). Production of IL10 combined with low-MLC reactivity associated significantly with insulin independence. The significant correlation between allograft-specific cytokine profiles and clinical outcome may reflect the induction of immune regulation in successfully transplanted recipients. Islet donor-specific IL10 production correlates with low alloreactivity and superior islet function. [source]

Long-Term Insulin-Independence After Allogeneic Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes: Over the 10-Year Mark

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 2 2009
T. Berney
Results of islet of Langerhans transplantation have markedly improved in recent years, but most patients still lose insulin independence in the long-term. We report herein the longest (over 11 years) case of insulin independence after allogeneic islet transplantation. The subject had a 27-year history of type 1 diabetes and received a single islet-after-kidney graft of 8800 islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg, pooled from 2 donors. Insulin was discontinued by 3 months posttransplant and the patient has remained off insulin ever since. Yearly follow-up studies have revealed normal metabolic control, including normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Reasons for success may involve choice of immunosuppression, low metabolic demand and low immune responsiveness as suggested by an excellent HLA matching and a high count of circulating regulatory T cells. This observation is so far an exceptional case, but clearly demonstrates the validity of the concept that long-term insulin independence after allogeneic islet transplantation is an achievable target. [source]

Prolonged Insulin Independence After Islet Allotransplants in Recipients with Type 1 Diabetes

Has Time Come for New Goals in Human Islet Transplantation?

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 6 2008
R. Lehmann
The enthusiasm regarding clinical islet transplantation has been dampened by the long-term results. Concerns about the associated risks of life-long immunosuppression and the striking imbalance between potential recipients and available donor pancreata warrant changes in some of the current goals. Islet transplantation will never be a cure of type 1 diabetes in the majority of patients with no secondary complications, but is a valid option for a limited number of patients with brittle diabetes waiting for an organ or after organ transplantation. Furthermore, insulin independence should not be the main goal of islet transplantation, but avoidance of severe hypoglycemia and good glycemic control, which can be achieved with a relatively small functional beta-cell mass. Therefore, initially one islet infusion is sufficient. Retransplantation at a later time point remains an option, if glucose control deteriorates. Efforts to improve islet transplantation should no longer focus on islet isolation and immunosuppression, but rather on the low posttransplant survival rate of islets caused by activation of the coagulation pathway and the limited oxygen delivery to the islets. Transplantation of smaller islets be it naturally small or size tailored reaggregated islets has the potential to facilitate these processes. [source]

Modified Two-Layer Preservation Method (M-Kyoto/PFC) Improves Islet Yields in Islet Isolation

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 3 2006
H. Noguchi
Islet allotransplantation can achieve insulin independence in patients with type I diabetes. Recent reports show that the two-layer method (TLM), which employs oxygenated perfluorochemical (PFC) and UW solution, is superior to simple cold storage in UW for pancreas preservation in islet transplantation. However, UW solution has several disadvantages, including the inhibition of Liberase activity. In this study, we investigated the features of a new solution, designated M-Kyoto solution. M-Kyoto solution contains trehalose and ulinastatin as distinct components. Trehalose has a cytoprotective effect against stress, and ulinastatin inhibits trypsin. In porcine islet isolation, islet yield was significantly higher in the M-Kyoto/PFC group compared with the UW/PFC group. There was no significant difference in ATP content in the pancreas between the two groups, suggesting that different islet yields are not due to their differences as energy sources. Compared with UW solution, M-Kyoto solution significantly inhibited trypsin activity in the digestion step; moreover, M-Kyoto solution inhibited collagenase digestion less than UW solution. In conclusion, the advantages of M-Kyoto solution are trypsin inhibition and less collagenase inhibition. Based on these data, we now use M-Kyoto solution for clinical islet transplantation from nonheart-beating donor pancreata. [source]

Evolution of pancreas transplant surgery

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 6 2010
Vincent W. T. Lam
Abstract Background:, Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality. Methods:, This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Results:, Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment. Conclusion:, Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. [source]