Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Insect Pollinators (insect + pollinator)
Selected AbstractsMimicry in plant-parasitic fungiFEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, Issue 2 2006Henry K. Ngugi Abstract Mimicry is the close resemblance of one living organism (the mimic) to another (the model), leading to misidentification by a third organism (the operator). Similar to other organism groups, certain species of plant-parasitic fungi are known to engage in mimetic relationships, thereby increasing their fitness. In some cases, fungal infection can lead to the formation of flower mimics (pseudoflowers) that attract insect pollinators via visual and/or olfactory cues; these insects then either transmit fungal gametes to accomplish outcrossing (e.g. in some heterothallic rust fungi belonging to the genera Puccinia and Uromyces) or vector infectious spores to healthy plants, thereby spreading disease (e.g. in the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum and the mummy berry pathogen Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi). In what is termed aggressive mimicry, some specialized plant-parasitic fungi are able to mimic host structures or host molecules to gain access to resources. An example is M. vaccinii-corymbosi, whose conidia and germ tubes, respectively, mimic host pollen grains and pollen tubes anatomically and physiologically, allowing the pathogen to gain entry into the host's ovary via stigma and style. We review these and other examples of mimicry by plant-parasitic fungi and some of the mechanisms, signals, and evolutionary implications. [source] The evolution of floral scent: the influence of olfactory learning by insect pollinators on the honest signalling of floral rewardsFUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, Issue 5 2009Geraldine A. Wright Summary 1.,The evolution of flowering plants has undoubtedly been influenced by a pollinator's ability to learn to associate floral signals with food. Here, we address the question of ,why' flowers produce scent by examining the ways in which olfactory learning by insect pollinators could influence how floral scent emission evolves in plant populations. 2.,Being provided with a floral scent signal allows pollinators to learn to be specific in their foraging habits, which could, in turn, produce a selective advantage for plants if sexual reproduction is limited by the income of compatible gametes. Learning studies with honeybees predict that pollinator-mediated selection for floral scent production should favour signals which are distinctive and exhibit low variation within species because these signals are learned faster. Social bees quickly learn to associate scent with the presence of nectar, and their ability to do this is generally faster and more reliable than their ability to learn visual cues. 3.,Pollinators rely on floral scent as a means of distinguishing honestly signalling flowers from deceptive ones. Furthermore, a pollinator's sensitivity to differences in nectar rewards can bias the way that it responds to floral scent. This mechanism may select for flowers that provide olfactory signals as an honest indicator of the presence of nectar or which select against the production of a detectable scent signal when no nectar is present. 4.,We expect that an important yet commonly overlooked function of floral scent is an improvement in short-term pollinator specificity which provides an advantage to both pollinator and plant over the use of a visual signal alone. This, in turn, impacts the evolution of plant mating systems via its influence on the species-specific patterns of floral visitation by pollinators. [source] The effects of neighbouring tree islands on pollinator density and diversity, and on pollination of a wet prairie species, Asclepias lanceolata (Apocynaceae)JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, Issue 3 2006DEREK R. ARTZ Summary 1The Everglades (Florida, USA) is a mosaic of different habitats. Tropical and temperate trees grow on patches of high ground (tree islands) surrounded by lower elevation wetland communities (marl prairie). 2Tree islands of various sizes provide nesting substrate, larval host plants and floral resources for insect pollinators. Herbaceous plants in the open surrounding wetlands may also depend on these pollinators. 3We investigated pollinator diversity and abundances in both tree island and marl prairie habitats using transect sampling methods and estimated pollination success of the milkweed Asclepias lanceolata, an insect-pollinated marl prairie species, in relation to distance from and size of the closest tree island. 4On a total of 11 bayhead tree islands, we found that insect diversity and abundance were greater on the edge of larger tree islands (20,30 m2) than on smaller tree islands (5,10 m2). Pollinator diversity and abundance in the marl prairie decreased with increasing distance from tree islands. 5Pairs of potted A. lanceolata plants were placed in the marl prairie at distances up to 1000 m from small and large tree islands. Fruit and seed production were highest for plants placed less than 25 m from tree islands and decreased with increasing distance. 6Our results suggest that tree islands are an important source of pollinators for the plants in the tree island and surrounding wetland habitats. 7This landscape-based study illustrates how overall landscape structure affects important biotic interactions, particularly plant,pollinator relationships. Our findings have far-reaching ecological implications for the reproductive success of plants in small, isolated populations that may depend on insect vectors for pollination. [source] The impact of an insecticide on insect flower visitation and pollination in an agricultural landscapeAGRICULTURAL AND FOREST ENTOMOLOGY, Issue 3 2010Claire Brittain 1Pesticides are considered a threat to pollinators but little is known about the potential impacts of their widespread use on pollinators. Less still is known about the impacts on pollination, comprising the ecosystem service that pollinators provide to wildflowers and crops. 2The present study measured flower visitation and pollination in an agricultural landscape, by placing potted flowering plants (Petunia sp.) in vine fields sprayed with a highly toxic insecticide (fenitrothion). During two sampling rounds, insect visitors to the petunias were observed and measures of pollination were recorded by counting and weighing seeds. 3In the earlier sampling round, a lower species richness of insect visitors was observed in fields that had received an early application of insecticide. No negative impacts were found from later applications. The results obtained suggest a greater potential harm to insect pollinators and flower visitation as a result of insecticide application early in the season. 4No reduction in pollination was found in fields that received an early insecticide application. Pollination was greater with two insecticide applications between sampling rounds rather than one application. 5In the present study system, insecticide application had a negative effect on pollinators but a possible positive effect on pollination services. In some cases, it may be that actions for conserving biodiversity will not benefit pollination services to all plants. [source] An ortholog of MIXTA-like2 controls epidermal cell shape in flowers of ThalictrumNEW PHYTOLOGIST, Issue 3 2009Verónica S. Di Stilio Summary ,,Here, we investigated the genetic underpinnings of pollination-related floral phenotypes in Thalictrum, a ranunculid with apetalous flowers. The variable presence of petaloid features in other floral organs correlates with distinct adaptations to insect vs. wind pollination. Conical cells are present in sepals or stamens of insect-pollinated species, and in stigmas. We characterized a Thalictrum ortholog of the Antirrhinum majus transcription factor MIXTA-like2, responsible for conical cells, from three species with distinct floral morphologies, representing two pollination syndromes. ,,Genes were cloned by PCR and analysed phylogenetically. Expression analyses were conducted by quantitative PCR and in situ hybridization, followed by functional studies in transgenic tobacco. ,,The cloned genes encode R2R3 MYB proteins closely related to Antirrhinum AmMYBML2 and Petunia hybrida PhMYB1. Spatial expression by in situ hybridization overlaps areas of conical cells. Overexpression in tobacco induces cell outgrowths in carpel epidermis and significantly increases the height of petal conical cells. ,,We have described the first orthologs of AmMIXTA-like2 outside the core eudicots, likely ancestral to the MIXTA/MIXTA-like1 duplication. The conserved role in epidermal cell elongation results in conical cells, micromorphological markers for petaloidy. This adaptation to attract insect pollinators was apparently lost after the evolution of wind pollination in Thalictrum. [source] Reproductive alternatives to insect pollination in four species of Thalictrum (Ranunculaceae)PLANT SPECIES BIOLOGY, Issue 2 2004JANET C. STEVEN Abstract Although insect pollination is ancestral in the angiosperms, selection has favored wind pollination and self-fertilization in many lineages. The evolution of clonal growth may have also decreased dependence on insect pollinators. We investigate transitions away from insect pollination in the genus Thalictrum (Ranunculaceae) among four species that vary in pollination syndrome. Thalictrum sparsiflorum is insect pollinated and self-fertilization may also provide reproductive assurance. Thalictrum alpinum is clonal, has a floral morphology associated with wind pollination and is self-compatible. Thalictrum fendleri is a wind-pollinated and dioecious species that sets few fruits naturally and invests little in sexual reproduction, possibly due to a trade-off with clonal growth. Thalictrum dioicum is also wind-pollinated and dioecious, but does not grow clonally at our sites and has a higher investment in sexual reproduction than T. fendleri. The pollen : ovule ratio is largest in wind-pollinated species, but varies considerably among them, possibly reflecting differences in pollination efficiency and/or incidental insect pollination. None of the species appear pollen limited in the study populations, suggesting that factors other than pollen receipt limit female fertility at these sites. [source] | ||||||||||