Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Inhibitor Medication (inhibitor + medication)
Selected AbstractsRandomised comparison of the FerX Ella antireflux stent and the ultraflex stent: Proton pump inhibitor combination for prevention of post-stent reflux in patients with esophageal carcinoma involving the esophago-gastric junctionJOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, Issue 5 2008Tarun Sabharwal Abstract Background and Aim:, Metal stents placed across the gastroesophageal junction in patients with malignant dysphagia frequently present with reflux symptoms. We compared an antireflux stent with a standard open stent used in combination with proton pump inhibitor medication. Methods:, Forty-nine patients with dysphagia due to inoperable carcinoma in the lower third of the esophagus were randomly selected to receive either a antireflux valve stent (FerX-Ella) (n = 22) or a covered standard open stent (Ultraflex), which was combined with proton pump inhibitors such as omeprazole (n = 26). The technical success, the presence of reflux, and complications were recorded. Results:, Reflux was seen in 3/22 patients (13.6%) in the FerX-Ella group and in 2/26 patients (7.7%) in the Ultraflex and proton pump inhibitor combination group (P -value not significant). In both groups, a significant improvement in the dysphagia score was seen and no statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups (P = 0.84). The FerX-Ella stents migrated more frequently (32%) than the Ultraflex stents (23%). This also necessitated surgical intervention more frequently in the FerX-Ella group (2/22, 9.1%) compared to the Ultraflex group (1/26, 3.8%). Conclusion:, The antireflux stent had no demonstrable advantages compared to the combination of standard open stent and proton pump inhibitor medication. [source] Patients Responding to Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Therapy,What Do Their Sexual Partners Know?THE JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, Issue 1 2007Theodor Klotz MD ABSTRACT Introduction., Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are an efficacious therapy in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). There are only a few studies that also focus on the participating couples during PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Aim., To determine to what extent patients personally informed their sexual partners about their ongoing PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Main Outcome Measures., Likelihood of informing the female partner by the patient himself about the use of PDE5 inhibitors. Methods., A total of 216 men (mean age 62.3 years) with ED were successfully treated with PDE5 inhibitors in three independent centers. After an interval of at least 3 months of successful ED therapy, all patients were asked by questionnaire whether their sexual partners were informed of their PDE5 inhibitor therapy. Results., Eighty-two percent of the patients were exclusively involved in one stable sexual relationship, 9.7% of the men admitted to having changing sexual partners, and 6% did not give any information at all about their sexual partners. Twenty percent of the men had a severe ED (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5] <11). Forty-nine percent showed a moderate ED (IIEF-5 11,16) and 31% suffered a mild ED (IIEF-5 >16). PDE5 inhibitor medication was used 1.2 times/month by men with a severe ED, 2.1 times/month by patients with a moderate ED, and 2.9 times/month by men with a mild ED. Forty-one (93%) of the 44 patients with a severe ED informed their sexual partners that they were taking PDE5 inhibitors. In the patient group with moderate ED, 49 (47%) of 105 patients and only 14 (21%) of 67 of the patients with mild ED shared this information with their partners. Conclusion., Less than 40% of the patients suffering a moderate or mild ED using PDE5 inhibitors shared this information with their partners. It seems that patients find ED so disturbing that many patients do not inform their partners of PDE5 inhibitor use. Klotz T, Mathers M, Klotz R, and Sommer F. Patients responding to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy,What do their sexual partners know? J Sex Med 2007;4:162,165. [source] Factors that predict changing the type of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor medication among men in the UKBJU INTERNATIONAL, Issue 4 2007Philip D. Kell OBJECTIVE To evaluate predictors of changing the type of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor (switching) among men with erectile dysfunction (ED) in the UK, the largest consumer of PDE5 inhibitors in Europe, as switching medication is often associated with higher resource use, and there are three oral PDE5 inhibitor medications currently available. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were identified from The Health Improvement Network database in the UK; men initiating therapy with sildenafil, tadalafil or vardenafil from May 2003 to August 2004 with ,,6 months of prescription history before and after their initial PDE5 inhibitor prescription were included. Switching was evaluated as the proportion of second PDE5 inhibitor prescriptions that were for a drug differing from the first. Logistic regression was used to adjust for factors that might be associated with switching (dose, age and the presence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes or depression). RESULTS Of the 2703 eligible men who initiated PDE5 inhibitor treatment during the study period, 91 (3.4%) switched to a different PDE5 inhibitor at their second prescription. The choice of initial PDE5 inhibitor therapy was a highly significant predictor of switching; men initiated on sildenafil were less likely to switch than those initiated on tadalafil (P < 0.001) or vardenafil (P < 0.003). Age and the presence of comorbidities were not significantly associated with switching (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Initiating ED therapy with sildenafil was associated with the lowest rate of PDE5 inhibitor switching, which might reflect treatment satisfaction and patient preference. [source] | ||||||||||