Home  About us  Contact
 

Impact Force (impact + force)

Distribution by Scientific Domains
Medical Sciences80%

Selected Abstracts

The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material

DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, Issue 1 2004
Tomotaka Takeda
Abstract,,, Most impact force and impact energy absorption tests for mouthguards have used a steel ball in a drop-ball or the pendulum device. However, in reality most sports-related trauma is caused by objects other than the steel ball, e.g. various sized balls, hockey puck, or bat or stick. Also, the elasticity, the velocity and the mass of the object could change the degree and the extent of injuries. In this study, we attempted to measure the impact force from actual sports equipment in order to clarify the exact mechanism of dental-related sports injuries and the protective effects of mouthguards. The present study was conducted using the pendulum impact device and load cell. Impact objects were removable. Seven mobile impact objects were selected for testing: a steel ball, baseball, softball, field hockey ball, ice hockey puck, cricket ball, and wooden baseball bat. The mouthguard material used in this study was a 3-mm-thick Drufosoft (Dreve-Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany), and test samples were made of the one-layer type. The peak transmitted forces without mouthguard ranged from the smallest (ice hockey stick, 46.9 kgf) to the biggest (steel ball, 481.6 kgf). The peak transmitted forces were smaller when the mouthguard was attached than without it for all impact materials but the effect was significantly influenced by the object type. The steel ball showed the biggest (62.1%) absorption ability while the wooden bat showed the second biggest (38.3%). The other balls or the puck showed from 0.6 to 6.0% absorbency. These results show that it is important to test the effectiveness of mouthguards on specific types of sports equipment. In future, we may select different materials and mouthguard designs suitable for specific sports. [source]

Theoretical Implications of the Biomechanical Fracture Threshold

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 10 2008
Tony M Keaveny
Abstract Because of the dichotomous nature of a bone fracture, when ,, the ratio of the applied impact force to the bone strength, is greater than a critical value,the biomechanical fracture threshold,fracture should occur. We sought to elucidate the conceptual implications of this biomechanical fracture threshold with application to hip fracture. We used data from the PaTH study, a 2-yr clinical trial in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate, PTH, or their combination. Outcomes included the force applied to the hip in a sideways fall as estimated from subject height and weight; femoral strength as determined by QCT-based finite element analysis; the load-to-strength ratio ,; and total hip areal BMD from DXA. Results indicated that those with "very low" femoral strength (<2000 N) invariably had load-to-strength ratio , values well above the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold (, = 1), but those with "moderately low" femoral strength (2000,4000 N) displayed , values both above and below the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold. This finding implies that the risk of a hip fracture can be high in those with only moderately low BMD because femoral strength can be low relative to fall impact forces. The observed weak correlation between areal BMD and the load-to-strength ratio , (r2 = 0.14) suggests that consideration of the biomechanical fracture threshold may improve fracture risk assessment, particularly for those in the osteopenic range. Regarding treatment effects, only those subjects having load-to-strength ratio , values within a relatively narrow "transition zone" of ±20% of the assumed biomechanical fracture threshold at baseline were predicted to change fracture status during the trial. In theory, outcomes of fracture trials may be dominated by the responses of those within the "transition zone" at baseline, and treatment benefits in terms of fracture efficacy may depend the patient's baseline status with respect to the biomechanical fracture threshold. We conclude that consideration of the theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold may lead to new insights and advances in the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis. [source]

Finite element analysis (FEA) applied to polyethylene foam cushions in package drop tests

PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, Issue 1 2005
N. J. Mills
Abstract Two designs of polyethylene (PE) foam cushions were compared, using a rigid ,product' of mass 5.6,kg, and an outer corrugated fibreboard box. The acceleration,time history for the product was measured when the box was dropped flat from 1,m onto a rigid floor. The data was processed to calculate the impact force as a function of the packaging deformation. Finite element analysis (FEA) predictions of the impact force vs. package deflection were accurate for end-cap designs using Ethafoam, but underestimated the slope of the experimental force vs. deflection relation for corner-cap designs. The corner-cap design is more efficient in reducing the peak product acceleration for multiple impacts. The contribution of the corrugated board box to the impact response appears to be small. The FEA results were compared with those from the cushion curve design method and were found to better predict the performance of complex shaped cushions. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source]

Theoretical Implications of the Biomechanical Fracture Threshold

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, Issue 10 2008
Tony M Keaveny
Abstract Because of the dichotomous nature of a bone fracture, when ,, the ratio of the applied impact force to the bone strength, is greater than a critical value,the biomechanical fracture threshold,fracture should occur. We sought to elucidate the conceptual implications of this biomechanical fracture threshold with application to hip fracture. We used data from the PaTH study, a 2-yr clinical trial in postmenopausal women treated with alendronate, PTH, or their combination. Outcomes included the force applied to the hip in a sideways fall as estimated from subject height and weight; femoral strength as determined by QCT-based finite element analysis; the load-to-strength ratio ,; and total hip areal BMD from DXA. Results indicated that those with "very low" femoral strength (<2000 N) invariably had load-to-strength ratio , values well above the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold (, = 1), but those with "moderately low" femoral strength (2000,4000 N) displayed , values both above and below the theoretical biomechanical fracture threshold. This finding implies that the risk of a hip fracture can be high in those with only moderately low BMD because femoral strength can be low relative to fall impact forces. The observed weak correlation between areal BMD and the load-to-strength ratio , (r2 = 0.14) suggests that consideration of the biomechanical fracture threshold may improve fracture risk assessment, particularly for those in the osteopenic range. Regarding treatment effects, only those subjects having load-to-strength ratio , values within a relatively narrow "transition zone" of ±20% of the assumed biomechanical fracture threshold at baseline were predicted to change fracture status during the trial. In theory, outcomes of fracture trials may be dominated by the responses of those within the "transition zone" at baseline, and treatment benefits in terms of fracture efficacy may depend the patient's baseline status with respect to the biomechanical fracture threshold. We conclude that consideration of the theoretical implications of the biomechanical fracture threshold may lead to new insights and advances in the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis. [source]