Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Anal Continence (anal + continence)
Selected AbstractsAn Innovative Sphincter Preserving Pull-Through Technique with En Bloc Colon and Small Bowel TransplantationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, Issue 8 2010K. R. Eid This report describes a new innovative pull-through technique of hindgut reconstruction with en bloc small bowel and colon transplantation in a Crohn's disease patient with irreversible intestinal failure. The approach was intersphincteric and the anastomosis was established between the allograft colon and the recipient anal verge with achievement of full nutritional autonomy and anal continence. [source] Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveriesAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Issue 3 2000M. R. Sangalli SUMMARY We contacted 208 women 13 years after they suffered an obstetrical anal sphincter tear in order to estimate the effect of subsequent vaginal deliveries on anal continence. Among the 177 eligible responders, 129 sustained a partial or complete 3rd degree and 48 a 4th degree tear; 114 women had subsequent vaginal deliveries. Anal incontinence was more common in women with 4th (25.0%) than with 3rd degree tears (11.5%, p = 0.049). Subsequent vaginal deliveries were associated with a higher prevalence of severe incontinence in women with 4th degree tears (p = 0.023). No aggravation or increase in prevalence of incontinence was observed in women with 3rd degree tears. These results suggest that in a subsequent pregnancy, careful evaluation is necessary and an abdominal delivery may be advisable for women with previous major sphincter trauma. [source] Temporal endosonographic evaluation of anal sphincter integrity after primary repair for obstetric ruptures: a case for specific training of obstetriciansCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 7Online 2010P. Pronk Abstract Objective, To evaluate primary repaired obstetric lesions of the anal sphincter complex on anal endo-ultrasound within a few days and 8 weeks after primary repair and to investigate in this way the influence of suboptimal woundhealing on the final anatomical result. Furthermore to investigate the relation between faecal incontinence and sphincter defects. Design, A prospective cohort study. Setting, The obstetric clinic and coloproctology outpatient clinic of the Zaans Medical Centre in Zaandam, the Netherlands. Subjects, A cohort of 32 consecutive women with primary surgically repaired 3B, 3C or 4th degree anal sphincter defect after vaginal delivery. Main outcome measures, Appearance of the anal sphincter complex on anal endo-ultrasound within a few days week and 8 weeks after primary surgical repair, i.e. first and second ultrasound, respectively. Evaluation of anal continence, using the Vaizey incontinence score, at second ultrasound. Results, No major wound breakdown was seen and four women had superficial, skin related wound problems. Twenty-eight women (87.5%) had a repaired external anal sphincter on the first and the second ultrasound. Of four external anal sphincter defects on first ultrasound one defect was not present on second ultrasound. The internal sphincter showed a defect on first ultrasound in 11 women and this was still present in 10 on second ultrasound. A total of 11 women had a persisting anal sphincter defect (external, internal or in combination). Mean Vaizey scores were significantly higher in women with a persisting sphincter defect (EAS, IAS or in combination) than in women with no sphincter defects, 2.3 and 0.4 respectively (95% CI 0.1,3.6, P = 0.04). Conclusion, Anal endo-ultrasound may be used for early evaluation of surgical repair of anal sphincter lesions after vaginal delivery. Persisting defects in the anal sphincters, in this series not because of major wound breakdown, can be explained by inadequate surgical repair. [source] Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcomeCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 4 2005C. Marceau Abstract Objective, Complete rectal prolapse is rare before the age of 50. The aim of our study was to identify the risk factors of total rectal prolapse before this age and to determine the surgical outcome in this specific group of patients. Patients and methods, The charts of all patients, younger than 50 years old, treated for total rectal prolapse between June 1995 and December 2001 were reviewed. Associated conditions were noted and pre and postoperative functions were compared in regards of constipation and evacuations problems, anal continence (Wexner score), recurrent prolapse and overall satisfaction. All patients underwent an abdominal rectopexy according to the Orr-Loygue procedure. Results, During the study period, 28 patients (21 females) with a mean age of 34 ± 9 years were treated for a total rectal prolapse in our institution. Five patient (17.8%) had minor complications. After a mean follow up of 25 months, the global continence improved significantly (Wexner score: 4.9 vs 2; P = 0.014): 8 patients suffering from liquid stools incontinence before surgery were continent after rectopexy, while 2 continent patients became incontinent to liquid stools after surgery. Fourteen patients had chronic psychiatric disease requiring permanent treatment. These patients suffered more frequently from constipation (12/14 vs 5/14; P =0.006) and required more often a digital evacuation before surgery (6/14 vs 1/14; P = 0.07) than non psychiatric patients. They also suffered from more severe constipation and required more enemas after surgery (1/14 vs 6/12; P = 0.03) compared to patients without psychiatric disease. The only two patients, who had recurrence also had psychiatric disease. Conclusion, Chronic psychiatric disease requiring long-term medication is observed in 50% of patients with total rectal prolapse under the age of 50 years. Moreover, the medically induced constipation in these patients could represent a cause of poorer functional outcome. Therefore, we recommand the identification of this preoperative risk factor to assess the results of total rectal prolapse treatment in patients younger than 50 years of age. [source] | ||||||||||