Home About us Contact | |||
Anal Canal Pressure (anal + canal_pressure)
Selected AbstractsComplications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation,BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 7 2002Dr H. Ortiz Background: The postoperative complications and functional outcome following 24 consecutive implantations of an artificial anal sphincter were assessed prospectively. Methods: A total of 24 artificial anal sphincters (Acticon Neosphincter®) were implanted in 22 patients (mean age 47 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 (range 6,48) months. Results were assessed prospectively by two independent observers at 4-month intervals. The cumulative probability of artificial anal sphincter removal was analysed by the Kaplan,Meier method. Results: Five patients were free of complications. During the postoperative period, complications occurred in nine patients, two of whom required reoperation. During follow-up, complications developed in ten patients, nine of whom were reoperated. Definitive device explantation was necessary in seven patients. The cumulative probability of device explantation was 44 per cent at 48 months. The 15 patients with functioning implants were followed up for a mean of 26 (range 7,48) months. Continence grading improved from a mean of 18 (range 14,20) in the preoperative period to 4 (range 0,14) after operation (P < 0·001). Resting anal canal pressure in patients with a functioning implant increased from a mean of 35 (range 8,87) mmHg before operation to 54 (range 34,70) mmHg after implantation (P < 0·01). Conclusion: An artificial anal sphincter is a useful alternative for refractory faecal incontinence but the incidence of late postoperative complications is high. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd [source] Changes in fatigability of the striated anal canal after childbirthCOLORECTAL DISEASE, Issue 9 2010K. R. Cattle Abstract Aim, Anal manometry is an established assessment tool for patients with faecal incontinence. Fatigue rate index (FRI) has been shown to discriminate between symptomatic patients and controls. The aim of this study was to compare manometry and fatigability of the anal canal in nulliparous women before and after childbirth. Method, An air-filled manometry device was used to record maximum resting and squeeze pressures, fatigue rate (recorded over 20 s) and FRI. Recordings were made before and after vaginal delivery. Results, Nineteen women were studied. Resting anal canal pressure was not significantly different before and after delivery (57.1 ± 13.6 vs 51.1 ± 11.9 cmH2O, P = 0.1). Squeeze pressure was significantly lower postpartum (106.5 ± 43.6 vs 75.5 ± 45.6 cmH2O, P < 0.001). Fatigue rate was significantly reduced postpartum (,129.5 ± 74.7 vs,76.1 ± 54.8 cmH2O/min, P = 0.001), but FRI was not significantly altered (1.23 ± 1.49 vs 1.41 ± 1.27 min, P = 0.09). Conclusion, Maximal squeeze pressure and fatigue rate of the anal canal are significantly reduced after childbirth. Resting anal canal pressure and FRI are not significantly different. [source] Faecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects: A study using endoanal ultrasonographyANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Issue 10 2001Joe J. Tjandra Background: Troublesome faecal incontinence following a lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is often attributed to faulty surgical techniques: division of excessive amount of internal sphincter or inadvertent injury to the external sphincter. The aim of the present paper was to assess the anatomic and physiological factors that may contribute to faecal incontinence following a technically satisfactory lateral internal sphincterotomy by a group of colorectal specialists. Methods: Fourteen patients (nine women, five men; median age: 38 years; range: 23,52 years) who developed troublesome postoperative faecal incontinence were evaluated by clinical assessment, endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal physiological studies (manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency) by two independent observers. The Cleveland Clinic continence score (0,20; 0, perfect continence; 20, complete incontinence) was used to quantify the severity of faecal incontinence. Fourteen continent subjects after a LIS (nine female patients, five male patients; median age: 36 years; range: 20,44 years) were also evaluated as ,continent' controls (continence score , 4). Results: In the incontinent group, the median postoperative Cleveland Clinic continence score was 9 (range: 6,13) compared with a preoperative score of 1 (range: 0,3). On assessment by endoanal ultrasonography the site of the internal sphincterotomy was clearly identified. There were additional coexisting defects, on endoanal ultrasonography, of the external anal sphincter in seven female patients, of the internal sphincter in two female and two male patients; and a defect of both the external and internal sphincters in a male patient who had had a prior fistulotomy. The pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was prolonged in two female patients on the side contralateral to the lateral internal sphincterotomy. In two of five male patients there was no evidence of any occult sphincter injuries. In the continent controls a defect of the distal portion of the external sphincter was noted in one female patient. None of the patients had a prolonged PNTML. The maximum voluntary contraction was significantly lower in the female subjects than in the female continent controls (92 mmHg vs 140 mmHg; P < 0.05), while the resting anal canal pressures and length of the high pressure zone were similar between the study subjects and the continent controls. Conclusion: Troublesome faecal incontinence after a satisfactorily performed lateral internal sphincterotomy is often associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects. [source] Sacral nerve stimulation for neurogenic faecal incontinenceBRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (NOW INCLUDES EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY), Issue 6 2007B. Holzer Background: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has emerged as a promising technique for the treatment of faecal incontinence. This study assessed the outcome of SNS in a cohort of patients with incontinence of neurological aetiology. Methods: Thirty-six patients were included in a trial of SNS. Twenty-nine subsequently had a permanent implant. Evaluation consisted of a continence diary, anal manometry, saline retention testing and quality of life assessment. Results: After a median follow-up of 35 (range 3,71) months, 28 patients showed a marked improvement in or complete recovery of continence. Incontinence to solid or liquid stool decreased from a median of 7 (range 4,15) to 2 (range 0,5) episodes in 21 days (P = 0·002). Saline retention time increased from a median of 2 (range 0,5) to 7 (range 2,15) min (P = 0·002). Maximum resting and squeeze anal canal pressures increased compared with preoperative values. Quality of life on all scales among patients who received a permanent implant increased at 12 and 24 months after operation. Conclusion: SNS is of value in selected patients with neurogenic faecal incontinence. Copyright © 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] |