Home About us Contact | |||
Anaesthesia Practice (anaesthesia + practice)
Selected AbstractsNordic guidelines for neuraxial blocks in disturbed haemostasis from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 1 2010H. BREIVIK Background: Central neuraxial blocks (CNBs) for surgery and analgesia are an important part of anaesthesia practice in the Nordic countries. More active thromboprophylaxis with potent antihaemostatic drugs has increased the risk of bleeding into the spinal canal. National guidelines for minimizing this risk in patients who benefit from such blocks vary in their recommendations for safe practice. Methods: The Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (SSAI) appointed a task force of experts to establish a Nordic consensus on recommendations for best clinical practice in providing effective and safe CNBs in patients with an increased risk of bleeding. We performed a literature search and expert evaluation of evidence for (1) the possible benefits of CNBs on the outcome of anaesthesia and surgery, for (2) risks of spinal bleeding from hereditary and acquired bleeding disorders and antihaemostatic drugs used in surgical patients for thromboprophylaxis, for (3) risk evaluation in published case reports, and for (4) recommendations in published national guidelines. Proposals from the taskforce were available for feedback on the SSAI web-page during the summer of 2008. Results: Neuraxial blocks can improve comfort and reduce morbidity (strong evidence) and mortality (moderate evidence) after surgical procedures. Haemostatic disorders, antihaemostatic drugs, anatomical abnormalities of the spine and spinal blood vessels, elderly patients, and renal and hepatic impairment are risk factors for spinal bleeding (strong evidence). Published national guidelines are mainly based on experts' opinions (weak evidence). The task force reached a consensus on Nordic guidelines, mainly based on our experts' opinions, but we acknowledge different practices in heparinization during vascular surgery and peri-operative administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during neuraxial blocks. Conclusions: Experts from the five Nordic countries offer consensus recommendations for safe clinical practice of neuraxial blocks and how to minimize the risks of serious complications from spinal bleeding. A brief version of the recommendations is available on http://www.ssai.info. [source] Inefficacy of simulator-based training on anaesthesiologists' non-technical skills,ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, Issue 5 2009Y. A. ZAUSIG Background: Analysis of critical incidents in anaesthesia practice emphasizes the important role of non-technical skills (NTS) in improving patient safety. Therefore, debriefing with regard to NTS has been added to medical management (MM) simulator training to improve acute crisis competencies of anaesthesiologists. The purpose of this study was to compare the NTS and MM performance of two groups of anaesthesiologists in a simulated anaesthesia crisis after undergoing different types of training. Methods: Forty-two anaesthesiologists were randomly assigned to two different training groups, with each group participating in two simulation training sessions. One group's (NTS+MMG) training included extensive debriefing of NTS (resource management, planning, leadership and communication) and MM, while the other group (MMG) received a simpler debriefing that focused solely on MM. The quality and quantity of NTS and quality of MM performance were rated by reviewing the videotapes of the scenarios. Results: NTS+MMG did not prove superior to MMG with regard to behavioural and MM markers. The quality of NTS performances correlated significantly (P<0.01) with the quantity of NTS demonstration, and also correlated significantly with the MM actions (P<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: A single session of training including debriefing of NTS and MM did not improve the NTS performances of anaesthesiologists when compared with anaesthesiologists who only received MM training. This might indicate that a more frequent or individual training is needed to improve participants' NTS performance. [source] A survey of inhalational anaesthetic abuse in anaesthesia training programmes,ANAESTHESIA, Issue 6 2008J. E. Wilson Summary This study aims to assess the prevalence and outcomes of inhalational anaesthetic abuse among anaesthesia training programmes. Online surveys were completed by chairpersons of academic anaesthesia training programmes in the United States. The response rate was 84% (106/126 programmes). Twenty-two percent of the departments had had at least one incident of inhalational anaesthetic abuse. Forty-eight percent (15/31) of the persons abusing inhalational anaesthetics were sent for rehabilitation. Only 22% (7/31) of those found to be abusing inhalational anaesthetics were ultimately able to return successfully to anaesthesia practice with sustained recovery. The mortality rate among individuals found abusing inhalational anaesthetics was 26% (8/31). The majority of the anaesthesia departments (97/104, 93%) did not have any pharmacy accounting of inhalational anaesthetics. This is the first published survey of inhalational anaesthesia abuse. Inhalational anaesthetic abuse should be considered in at-risk individuals or those with a history of substance abuse. The concern about substance abuse is not unique to American anaesthetists. Countries around the world deal with similar substance abuse issues. [source] Regional anaesthesia in developing countriesANAESTHESIA, Issue 2007T. Schnittger Summary In modern anaesthesia practice, regional techniques are preferred to general anaesthesia for many types of surgery, particularly in obstetric care. Improved outcomes have been recorded in UK practice, but the techniques remain underutilised in many parts of the world. With encouragement, training and a regular supply of appropriate needles and local anaesthetic agents, the advantages of regional techniques in the developing world could be realised. [source] Remifentanil in neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia practiceACTA PAEDIATRICA, Issue 10 2010Márcia Gomes Penido Abstract Remifentanil is a relatively new ultrashort action synthetic opioid. Studies on the use of remifentanil in neonatology have emerged demonstrating its effectiveness and safety in neonates. The present study describes the use of remifentanil in both full-term and premature newborns, highlighting the theoretical benefits for this population in terms of both neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia. A Medline search was undertaken of all reviews and reports about the use of remifentanil in neonates published between 1996 and 2009 using MeSH search terms ,remifentanil', ,analgesia', ,anaesthesia', ,newborn' and ,neonate'. The review points that remifentanil has been used with advantages in newborns including preterm neonates and even for foetal anaesthesia. It proved to be a good option to attenuate the hemodynamic/endocrine markers of stress related to surgery. Owing to its unique pharmacokinetic profile, shorter extubation times can be achieved what makes the drug also a good option for short duration invasive procedures in NICUs (InSurE). A concern on its use is that the hemodynamic response (hypotension) may become significant when the drug is associated to other drugs like sevoflurane. Conclusion:, Remifentanil seems to be an effective and safely used opioid for neonatal intensive care and anaesthesia practice. [source] |