Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hypnotic Effects (hypnotic + effects)
Selected AbstractsPreliminary evidence for hypnotic effects of Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)FOCUS ON ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH, Issue 1 2006Article first published online: 14 JUN 2010 [source] Acute, Rapid, and Chronic Tolerance During Ontogeny: Observations When Equating Ethanol Perturbation Across AgeALCOHOLISM, Issue 9 2001Marisa M. Silveri Background: Sensitivity to the motor-impairing and hypnotic effects of ethanol (EtOH) increases notably during development. Less is known, however, about the ontogeny of EtOH tolerance and the ontogenetic relationship among different types of tolerance. Consequently, we compared the ontogenetic development of acute, rapid, and chronic tolerance to EtOH-induced motor impairment and hypothermia in a swim task. Methods: Preweanling, adolescent, and adult female and male Sprague-Dawley rats were given chronic saline (control group), five daily EtOH exposures before EtOH on test day (chronic group), one EtOH exposure before test day (rapid group), or EtOH exposure only on test day (acute groups). Separate groups of animals in the acute groups were tested at 15, 60, or 105 min after injection to estimate acute tolerance development via calculating slopes of the linear regression of impairment relative to brain alcohol levels at each postinjection interval. Initial EtOH perturbation of swim performance was equated across age by varying EtOH dose. Results: Acute tolerance was evident to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH at all ages. When impairment was indexed relative to brain alcohol levels, rapid and chronic tolerance to the motor-impairing effects of EtOH on latency to reach the start was seen across age, although this tolerance tended to be more pronounced in adults. Somewhat different ontogenetic patterns of tolerance development were observed with EtOH-induced hypothermia, a dependent measure for which EtOH perturbation was not equated across age. Conclusions: The degree of initial perturbation by EtOH seems to be an important predictor of tolerance expression during ontogeny. That is, ontogenetic profiles of tolerance development differ significantly when EtOH-induced motor impairment is equated across age rather than dose of EtOH administered . The role of target response measures and context stress should also be considered when exploring ontogenetic expression of EtOH tolerance. [source] Pharmacokinetics of valerenic acid after single and multiple doses of valerian in older womenPHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, Issue 10 2010Gail D. Anderson Abstract Insomnia is a commonly reported clinical problem with as many as 50% of older adults reporting difficulty in falling and/or remaining asleep. Valerian (Valeriana officinalis) is a commonly used herb that has been advocated for promoting sleep. Valerenic acid is used as a marker for quantitative analysis of valerian products with evidence of pharmacological activity relevant to the hypnotic effects of valerian. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of valerenic acid in a group of elderly women after receiving a single nightly valerian dose and after 2 weeks of valerian dosing. There was not a statistically significant difference in the average peak concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax) area under the time curve (AUC), elimination half-life (T1/2) and oral clearance after a single dose compared with multiple dosing. There was considerable inter- and intra-subject variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters. Cmax and AUC deceased and T1/2 increased with increased body weight. The variability between the capsules was extremely low: 2.2%, 1.4% and 1.4%, for hydroxyvalerenic acid, acetoxyvalerenic acid and valerenic acid, respectively. In conclusion, large variability in the pharmacokinetics of valerenic acid may contribute to the inconsistencies in the effect of valerian as a sleep aid. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [source] Possible Pleiotropic Effects of Genes Specifying Sedative/Hypnotic Sensitivity to Ethanol on Other Alcohol-Related TraitsALCOHOLISM, Issue 10 2002Jeremy C. Owens Background Initial sensitivity to ethanol is a predictor of alcohol abuse that has been studied extensively in both human and animal populations. Selection for initial sensitivity to the sedative/hypnotic effects of ethanol resulted in the long-sleep and short-sleep lines of mice. Some of the genes selected in these lines could also specify differential responses in other ethanol-related phenotypes and, perhaps, for other drugs of abuse. We assessed congenic mice carrying a single quantitative trait locus (QTL) from the inbred long-sleep (ILS) or inbred short-sleep (ISS) strain on the reciprocal background for a number of ethanol- and pentobarbital-related phenotypes. Methods Each congenic strain was tested for ethanol elimination rates at 4.1 g/kg, ethanol-induced ataxia at 2.0 g/kg, ethanol-induced hypothermia at 4.1 g/kg, and pentobarbital-induced loss of righting reflex (LORR) at 60 mg/kg. Additionally, the ILS.ISS congenics were tested for low-dose ethanol-induced activation (LDA) at five doses ranging from 0.6 to 1.2 g/kg ethanol, and the ISS.ILS congenics were tested for LDA at 1.8 g/kg of ethanol. Results There was little difference in the ethanol elimination rate between congenics and background strains, although a modest sex effect was found, with the females eliminating ethanol more rapidly than the males. We were unable to replicate previous differences found in LDA for the Lore1 congenic on the ISS background, because none of the congenics differed from controls for LDA. Lore5 congenics showed a differential effect of pentobarbital-induced LORR in the expected directions. The Lore1 congenics on the ISS background showed more ethanol-induced ataxia than the ISS controls. Additionally, the hypothermic response seems affected by Lore4 and Lore5 and maybe others. Conclusions At least two regions carrying a QTL specifying sensitivity to high doses of ethanol cospecify altered sensitivity in other measures of alcohol action. Specifically, these QTLs clearly affect ethanol-induced hypothermia and pentobarbital-induced LORR and possibly ethanol-induced ataxia. [source] Different Sensitivity to Ethanol in Alcohol-Preferring sP and -Nonpreferring sNP RatsALCOHOLISM, Issue 11 2000Giancarlo Colombo Background and Objectives Clinical research has proposed that initial sensitivity to ethanol may be negatively correlated with levels of subsequent ethanol intake; consistently, alcohol-preferring P rats were found to be less sensitive to the ataxic and sedative/hypnotic effects of ethanol than -nonpreferring NP rats. The present study investigated the initial sensitivity to the ataxic and sedative/hypnotic effects of ethanol and to the sedative/hypnotic effects of pentobarbital and diazepam in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring sP and -nonpreferring sNP rats. Methods: In experiment 1, time to lose (onset) and regain (sleep time) the righting reflex after the acute intraperitoneal (ip) administration of 3.0 and 3.5 g/kg ethanol were measured in sP and sNP rats. In experiment 2, sP and sNP rats were required to perform a motor coordination task on a Rota-Rod after the acute intragastric administration of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 g/kg ethanol. Experiment 3 assessed onset and sleep time in sP and sNP rats after the acute injection of pentobarbital (40 mg/kg; ip) and diazepam (15 and 20 mg/kg; ip). Results: In experiment 1, sP rats took shorter times to lose the righting reflex and regained this reflex over longer periods of time and at lower blood ethanol levels than sNP rats. In experiment 2, ethanol affected motor coordination to a greater extent in sP than sNP rats. In contrast, results from experiment 3 showed that sP and sNP rats were not differentially sensitive to the sedative/hypnotic effects of pentobarbital and diazepam. Conclusions: The results of experiments 1 and 2 suggest that sP rats possess a genetically determined, greater sensitivity to the motor impairing and sedative/hypnotic effects of ethanol than sNP rats. Although caution should be adopted before hypothesizing any comparison to humans, these results may feature sP rats as an experimental model of those subsets of human alcoholics with initial high sensitivity to ethanol challenges. Finally, the results of experiment 3 suggest a minimal involvement of the benzodiazepine and barbiturate recognition sites in the differential sensitivity to ethanol of sP and sNP rats. [source] | ||||||||||