Home About us Contact
|
Home About us Contact | ||
|
|
||
Hyperglycaemic Clamp (hyperglycaemic + clamp)
Selected AbstractsAn increase in insulin sensitivity and basal beta-cell function in diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone in a placebo-controlled randomized studyDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 6 2004T. M. Wallace Abstract Aims To investigate the effect of treatment with pioglitazone on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in Type 2 diabetes. Methods Thirty subjects with diet-controlled Type 2 diabetes were randomized to 3 months treatment with pioglitazone (n = 19) or placebo (n = 11). All subjects underwent basal sampling for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), followed by an intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperglycaemic clamp, followed by an euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp; at baseline and after treatment. Results All results are expressed as mean (sem). Pioglitazone increased basal insulin sensitivity by 24.7% (7.8) HOMA-%S vs. 2.1% (5.9) in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Stimulated insulin sensitivity, M/I, increased in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo: +15.1 (2.8) l kg,1 min,1 vs. +3.2 (2.9) l kg,1 min,1, respectively (P = 0.009). Pioglitazone increased adiponectin by 39.3 (6.3), ng/ml compared with a decrease of 0.8 (1.3) ng/ml with placebo (P = 0.00004). HOMA-%B increased with pioglitazone, +11.5% (4.8) vs. ,2.0% (4.8) with placebo (P = 0.049), but there was no change in stimulated beta-cell function as determined by hyperglycaemic clamps. There was a significant reduction in the proinsulin/insulin ratio in the pioglitazone group, ,0.057 (0.02) compared with placebo, +0.004 (0.02) (P = 0.03). There was a significant reduction in HbA1c of 0.6% (0.1) in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo (P = 0.003). There was no significant weight gain associated with pioglitazone therapy: +0.7 (sem 0.6) kg vs. +1.1 (sem 0.5) kg in placebo group (P = NS). Conclusions Basal beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity improved following pioglitazone therapy. The improvement in proinsulin to insulin ratio suggests that beta-cells are under less stress. [source] Active immunization against leptin fails to affect reproduction and exerts only marginal effects on glucose metabolism in young female goatsJOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND NUTRITION, Issue 7-8 2006H. Sauerwein Summary Approximately 150 days before expected breeding time, 12 female goats (3 months of age) were actively immunized against ovine leptin. Booster injections were given throughout the following year. Control animals (n = 6) were sham-immunized. After the first observed oestrus, a buck was introduced and goats were mated. Blood samples were collected twice weekly and frequent blood sampling series were performed on days ,15, 76, 153 and 286 relative to the first immunization. Nine of the immunized goats developed titres within 3 months and had elevated serum concentrations of leptin compared with controls (p < 0.0001). Hematological parameters and blood chemistry were not affected by the immunization. No differences were detectable in all reproductive parameters recorded. Serum insulin was higher in immunized goats during the frequent blood sampling series of day 287 after the first immunization. Glucose metabolism was investigated during pregnancy using hyperglycaemic and euglycaemic/hyperinsulinaemic clamps. None of the parameters derived from the clamp studies was different (p > 0.05) between the two groups. During the hyperglycaemic clamp there was a trend (p < 0.15) towards increased insulin concentrations in immunized animals whereas glucose infusion rates were not different between the groups. This indicates decreased insulin sensitivity in immunized goats. Our study describes the ontogenesis of serum concentrations of leptin during growth, puberty and first pregnancy and parturition for the caprine species. The effects of the immunization were not detectable or only marginal and the approach aimed at therefore not effective to investigate leptin action in detail. [source] Inflammatory change of fatty liver induced by intraportal low-dose lipopolysaccharide infusion deteriorates pancreatic insulin secretion in fructose-induced insulin-resistant ratsLIVER INTERNATIONAL, Issue 8 2008Po-Shiuan Hsieh Abstract Background: This study tested whether subacute inflammatory change of fatty liver induced by portal endotoxaemia is detrimental to pancreatic insulin secretion in fructose-fed rats (FFRs) with fatty liver. Methods: Rats were randomly assigned into two groups with a regular or fructose-enriched diet for 8 weeks. Rats, after fructose feeding for 4 weeks, were further divided into three subgroups: on fructose diet alone, on fructose diet combined with intraportal saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion (n=8 per group) for the next 4 weeks. In another set of experiments, the liver and pancreatic tissues were obtained for histological examination in these four groups. Pancreatic insulin secretion was evaluated by in vivo hyperglycaemic clamp study. Results: Fasting plasma insulin concentrations and homoeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, an insulin resistance score, were significantly increased in FFRs but failed to change in rats with LPS treatment. The 4-week intraportal LPS infusion significantly increased circulating aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase and C-reactive protein levels but did not alter endotoxin levels in FFRs. The increased white blood cell count was also noted in rats after intraportal LPS infusion for 2 and 4 weeks. The attenuated first-phase and second-phase insulin responses in FFRs shown in hyperglycaemic clamp were further deteriorated in those with intraportal LPS infusion. Increased histopathological scores of liver and pancreas shown in FFRs were further increased in those combined with portal endotoxaemia. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the chronic subacute inflammatory change of fatty liver induced by mild portal endotoxaemia could deteriorate insulin secretion in a rodent model of metabolic syndrome and fatty liver. [source] PRETREATMENT WITH INTRAVENOUS ASCORBIC ACID PRESERVES ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION DURING ACUTE HYPERGLYCAEMIA (R1)CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, Issue 5-6 2005Brian A Mullan SUMMARY 1.,Acute hyperglycaemia may impair endothelial function. Ascorbic acid (AA), administered intra-arterially, has been reported to improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation during a forearm hyperglycaemic clamp. Using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, we investigated the potential for intravenous ascorbic acid to modify the endothelial response to acute systemic hyperglycaemia in humans. 2.,Nine healthy male volunteers were recruited from the hospital staff. Endothelial function was determined by measuring the forearm blood flow responses to intrabrachial infusions of endothelium-dependent (ED) and endothelium-independent (EID) vasodilators. The endothelial function index (EFI) was derived from the ratio of ED and EID vasodilatation. Haemodynamic and endothelial function measurements were performed at baseline and then repeated 2 h after a systemic hyperglycaemic clamp (14 mmol/L). The subjects, studied on two separate occasions, were randomized to placebo or 2 g intravenous ascorbic acid prior to the initiation of hyperglycaemia. 3.,After systemic hyperglycaemia with placebo pretreatment, the EFI fell from 1.08 ± 0.21 to 0.74 ± 0.13 (difference (95% confidence interval): 0.34 (0.20, 0.47); P < 0.001). When subjects were pretreated with ascorbic acid, the EFI was not affected by hyperglycaemia (1.11 ± 0.21 to 1.12 ± 0.17; P = 0.938). This difference between placebo and ascorbic acid was significant (P < 0.001). Plasma ascorbate concentrations decreased during hyperglycaemia and correlated directly with the reduction in the EFI (r = 0.798; P < 0.001). 4.,Pretreatment with an intravenous bolus of ascorbic acid can prevent endothelial dysfunction during acute systemic hyperglycaemia. Therefore, ascorbic acid may have potential therapeutic use in clinical situations where acute hyperglycaemia may be a complication. [source] An increase in insulin sensitivity and basal beta-cell function in diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone in a placebo-controlled randomized studyDIABETIC MEDICINE, Issue 6 2004T. M. Wallace Abstract Aims To investigate the effect of treatment with pioglitazone on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in Type 2 diabetes. Methods Thirty subjects with diet-controlled Type 2 diabetes were randomized to 3 months treatment with pioglitazone (n = 19) or placebo (n = 11). All subjects underwent basal sampling for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA), followed by an intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperglycaemic clamp, followed by an euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp; at baseline and after treatment. Results All results are expressed as mean (sem). Pioglitazone increased basal insulin sensitivity by 24.7% (7.8) HOMA-%S vs. 2.1% (5.9) in the placebo group (P = 0.02). Stimulated insulin sensitivity, M/I, increased in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo: +15.1 (2.8) l kg,1 min,1 vs. +3.2 (2.9) l kg,1 min,1, respectively (P = 0.009). Pioglitazone increased adiponectin by 39.3 (6.3), ng/ml compared with a decrease of 0.8 (1.3) ng/ml with placebo (P = 0.00004). HOMA-%B increased with pioglitazone, +11.5% (4.8) vs. ,2.0% (4.8) with placebo (P = 0.049), but there was no change in stimulated beta-cell function as determined by hyperglycaemic clamps. There was a significant reduction in the proinsulin/insulin ratio in the pioglitazone group, ,0.057 (0.02) compared with placebo, +0.004 (0.02) (P = 0.03). There was a significant reduction in HbA1c of 0.6% (0.1) in the pioglitazone group compared with placebo (P = 0.003). There was no significant weight gain associated with pioglitazone therapy: +0.7 (sem 0.6) kg vs. +1.1 (sem 0.5) kg in placebo group (P = NS). Conclusions Basal beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity improved following pioglitazone therapy. The improvement in proinsulin to insulin ratio suggests that beta-cells are under less stress. [source] | ||||||||||