Home About us Contact | |||
Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (human + mesenchymal_stromal_cell)
Selected AbstractsA decreased positivity for CD90 on human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is associated with a loss of immunosuppressive activity by MSCs,CYTOMETRY, Issue 3 2009Diana Campioni Abstract Biologic and clinical interest in human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSC) has risen over the last years, mainly due to their immunosuppressive properties. In this study, we investigated the basis of immunomodulant possible variability using hMSC from different sources (amniotic membrane, chorion, and bone marrow from either healthy subjects or patients with hematological malignancies, HM) and having discordant positivity for several immunological markers. The CD90+ hMSC reduced lymphoproliferative response in phytohemagglutinin (PHA) activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) via sHLA-G and IL-10 up-modulation. On the contrary, hMSC showing a significantly lower expression for CD90 antigen, elicited a lymphoproliferative allogeneic response in PHA/PBMCs without any increase in soluble HLA-G and IL-10 levels. These data seems to suggest that CD90 molecule may be considered a novel predictive marker for hMSC inhibitory ability, and might cooperate with HLA-G molecule in regulating suppressive versus stimulatory properties of hMSC. These results may have clinical implication in either transplantation or in regenerative medicine fields. © 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society [source] Intracrine androgenic apparatus in human bone marrow stromal cellsJOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, Issue 9b 2009Tarvo Sillat Abstract It was suggested that human mesenchymal stromal cells might contain an intracrine enzyme machinery potentially able to synthesize the cell's own supply of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) pro-hormone produced in the adrenal cortex in the reticular zone, which is unique to primates. Indeed, 3,-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3,-HSD) and 5,-reductase enzyme proteins were expressed in resting mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in vitro. However, the ,bridging' enzymes 17,-HSDs, catalysing interconversion between 17,-ketosteroids and 17,-hydroxysteroids, were not found in resting MSCs, but 17,-HSD enzyme protein was induced in a dose-dependent manner by DHEA. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions disclosed that this was mainly due to induction of the isoform 5 catalysing this reaction in ,forward', androgen-bound direction (P < 0.01). This work demonstrates that the MSCs have an intracrine machinery to convert DHEA to DHT if and when challenged by DHEA. DHEA as substrate exerts a positive, feed-forward up-regulation on the 17,-hydroxy steroid dehydrogenase-5, which may imply that DHEA-DHT tailor-making in MSCs is subjected to chronobiological regulation. [source] DNA methylation pattern changes upon long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cellsAGING CELL, Issue 1 2010Simone Bork Summary Within 2,3 months of in vitro culture-expansion, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) undergo replicative senescence characterized by cell enlargement, loss of differentiation potential and ultimate growth arrest. In this study, we have analyzed DNA methylation changes upon long-term culture of MSC by using the HumanMethylation27 BeadChip microarray assessing 27 578 unique CpG sites. Furthermore, we have compared MSC from young and elderly donors. Overall, methylation patterns were maintained throughout both long-term culture and aging but highly significant differences were observed at specific CpG sites. Many of these differences were observed in homeobox genes and genes involved in cell differentiation. Methylation changes were verified by pyrosequencing after bisulfite conversion and compared to gene expression data. Notably, methylation changes in MSC were overlapping in long-term culture and aging in vivo. This supports the notion that replicative senescence and aging represent developmental processes that are regulated by specific epigenetic modifications. [source] Novel ceramic bone replacement material CeraBall® seeded with human mesenchymal stem cellsCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Issue 3 2010Timothy Douglas Abstract Objectives: Hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) are two very common ceramic materials for bone replacement. A recently developed material for bone replacement is CeraBall®, which is a mixed HA,TCP scaffold available as porous spherical scaffolds of diameter 4 and 6 mm. Before their use as bone replacement materials in vivo, in vitro testing of these scaffolds is necessary. The goal of this study was to characterise 4 and 6 mm CeraBall® scaffolds in vitro with a view to their future use as bone replacement materials. Materials and methods: The proliferation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) seeded on CeraBall® scaffolds was evaluated quantitatively using the WST [Water soluble tetrazolium ((4-[3-(4- Iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1, 3-benzene disulfonate)] test and qualitatively by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, the standard MTT [(3-(4, 5-Dimenthylthiazol-2-Y1)-2, 5-Diphenyltetrazolium bromide)] biocompatibility test and cell vitality staining were performed using hMSCs. CeraBall® scaffolds were also tested for their mechanical properties. Results: SEM and WST test results showed that hMSCs proliferated on CeraBall® scaffolds over the course of 9 days. Proliferation was similar to that seen on tissue culture polystyrene (control). Cells showed a well-spread morphology and formed ,sheets' on the surface of scaffolds. Invasion of pores was observed. Good biocompatibility was demonstrated by MTT test results and cell vitality staining. Scaffolds of both 4 and 6 mm were able to withstand compressive loads of 5 N. Conclusions: CeraBall® scaffolds show good biocompatibility in vitro for hMSCs. This opens the way for in vivo applications. To cite this article: Douglas T, Liu Q, Humpe A, Wiltfang J, Sivananthan S, Warnke PH. Novel ceramic bone replacement material CeraBall® seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 262,267. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01818.x [source] |